• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

LGBTQ Community Gets Evangelist Franklin Graham Event Ads Pulled In The UK

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Where has he ever stated that gay persons should be stoned to death?
That would be under islam, not Christianity!
From.his Facebook page:

I have to respectfully disagree with former President Jimmy Carter on this one. He is absolutely wrong when he said Jesus would approve of gay marriage. Jesus didn’t come to promote sin, He came to save us from sin. The Bible is very clear. God destroyed the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah because of homosexuality
(Italics mine) : ie: God kills gays....which is pretty darn close to 'God Hates Fags' as espoused by the late Freaky Fred Phelps of Westboro 'Baptist'
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You don't think the Bible addresses homosexuality? That's enlightening.
The Bible talks about a lot of things. Not all of them are the Gospel and thus the province of the evangelist. Rev Graham would do well to learn that.
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Presumably then by your reaction you would insist on Rev Graham preaching as forcefully against shirts being mixed polyester and cotton as you would he preaches against the "lifting of such shirts" ie: homosexual acts: both, after all, are condemned by Leviticus and are thus surely part of 'The Gospel'. Indeed, I look forward to the good reverend's next evangelistic preaching when he vociferously prohibits a husband and wife getting it on when she is on her period, since that is prohibited by the very same chapters of Leviticus as condemn Teh Gayz (18 and 20) and is an integral part of The Gospel.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Presumably then by your reaction you would insist on Rev Graham preaching as forcefully against shirts being mixed polyester and cotton as you would he preaches against the "lifting of such shirts" ie: homosexual acts: both, after all, are condemned by Leviticus and are thus surely part of 'The Gospel'. Indeed, I look forward to the good reverend's next evangelistic preaching when he vociferously prohibits a husband and wife getting it on when she is on her period, since that is prohibited by the very same chapters of Leviticus as condemn Teh Gayz (18 and 20) and is an integral part of The Gospel.

Soft pedaling the gospel saves no one. Homosexual acts are sinful and there's no way around it. Obfuscation and rationalization simply won't work. It is what it is.
 

Alcott

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Presumably then by your reaction you would insist on Rev Graham preaching as forcefully against shirts being mixed polyester and cotton as you would he preaches against the "lifting of such shirts" ie: homosexual acts: both, after all, are condemned by Leviticus and are thus surely part of 'The Gospel'. Indeed, I look forward to the good reverend's next evangelistic preaching when he vociferously prohibits a husband and wife getting it on when she is on her period, since that is prohibited by the very same chapters of Leviticus as condemn Teh Gayz (18 and 20) and is an integral part of The Gospel.

Bud, you need to learn your New Testament, which does not mention shirts of mixed fabrics or a woman's uncleanness during her period, but does mention and condemn having attraction to one's same sex. For the record, the NT also does not require church members to 'tithe,' observe a sabbath, or to abstain from particular foods or drinks except for blood. Anything else you don't know?
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I note you've failed to address the Levitical point

That's because you don't have a point to address. The sin of homosexual activity is condemned in the New Testament, just like it is in the old.

Alcott is right. You need to brush up on your bible reading skills.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Then I look forward to the next sermon against black pudding....

Presumably then by your reaction you would insist on Rev Graham preaching as forcefully against shirts being mixed polyester and cotton as you would he preaches against the "lifting of such shirts" ie: homosexual acts: both, after all, are condemned by Leviticus and are thus surely part of 'The Gospel'. Indeed, I look forward to the good reverend's next evangelistic preaching when he vociferously prohibits a husband and wife getting it on when she is on her period, since that is prohibited by the very same chapters of Leviticus as condemn Teh Gayz (18 and 20) and is an integral part of The Gospel.
I'm afraid I can't go along with this at all. If you want to open a thread on figurative language and cleanliness laws in Leviticus, feel free to start a thread.

We cannot back off on God's moral laws. Homosexuality is forbidden in several places in both Old and New Testaments. The fact that there is tremendous push-back from the homosexual lobby is neither here nor there. The is a very apposite quotation often wrongly assigned to Luther, but no less true for that:

"If I profess with the loudest voice and clearest exposition every portion of the word of God except precisely that little point that the world and the devil are at that moment attacking, I am not confessing Christ, however boldly I may be professing Him. Where the battle rages, there the loyalty of the soldier is proved, and to be steady on all the battlefield beside is mere flight and disgrace if he flinches at that point."

Having said that, we should note that the Lord Jesus was called the Friend of sinners. He di not go off on a rant against tax-collectors, but rather called Matthew and Zacchaeus gently to Himself. Read Rosaria Butterfield's memoir, Confessions of an Unlikely Convert. Abuse and condemnation only hardened her in her sin. It was someone who took time to befriend her and show the Lord Jesus to her who won her for Christ.

In debate with the LBGTQWERTY lobby, let Graham and others be polite but firm. When he comes to Blackpool, let him show the people Jesus Christ and Him crucified.
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm not here on this thread to argue whether the Bible does or does not condemn same-sex sexual relationships but, rather, whether focussing on this should be a part of preaching the Gospel and thus the preserve of the evangelist (rather than, say, a pastor or teacher) in the Church. I suspect you and I therefore agree
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm not here on this thread to argue whether the Bible does or does not condemn same-sex sexual relationships ...

But that is exactly what you have been doing from the get go.. You need to get your story straight.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Well he seemed to go the full Westboro last week and say that gays deserve death. That might just have a teensy-weensy bit to do with his ads being pulled from a Blackpool bus...which is a shame, because he's actually a good preacher of the Gospel and if he stuck to that he'd get his message across more effectively. How about evangelists, you know, evangelizing!?
Quote what Franklin said in full context. You are defaming the man. He consistently says all sinners deserve death. Shameful behavior on your part!
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm not here on this thread to argue whether the Bible does or does not condemn same-sex sexual relationships but, rather, whether focussing on this should be a part of preaching the Gospel and thus the preserve of the evangelist (rather than, say, a pastor or teacher) in the Church. I suspect you and I therefore agree
Ok, rip part of The Bible out and throw it away.....
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Bible talks about a lot of things. Not all of them are the Gospel and thus the province of the evangelist. Rev Graham would do well to learn that.
I thought "Turn from your sin and repent" is the classical message of the evangelist. Education on what sin is definitely falls under this heading.
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But that is exactly what you have been doing from the get go.. You need to get your story straight.
No, please re-read what I put both on this page and the first: I said from my second post on this thread that evangelists should stick to the Gospel....and then gone on to expand on what is and is not the Gospel
 
Top