Liberal paradise

[Earth Wind and Fire]

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs. That's Communism. A Socialist country is where the state owns the industries. Just in the last couple of days you've confused Democracy with a Republic and just now Communism with Socialism.

Explains a lot, that.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.

who is the State?

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

There aren't any white socialist European countries. There are some European countries with social democrat governments. Again, you don't seem to know the difference between the two

What is Poland considered?

 

[Matt Black]

The present ruling Law and Justice party is a populist conservative nationalist party, so I'd say right-wing.

No they aren't. No one is migrating to them. We have to beat off all the migrants that want to come here. Some times you just make stuff up.

Hmmm...you and CMG have been going on about the refugees migrating to these countries in recent years. So which is it - are people migrating there or not? Or are they Schroedinger's Immigrants?

 

[Reynolds]

So you could not follow a requirement mandated by a court and assume you haven't broken the law? Let's say court mandated community service. Good luck with that.

Apples and oranges.

 

[FollowTheWay]

Apples and oranges.

In what way?
Analysis | What you need to know about former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio’s record on illegal immigration

In July 2017, Arpaio was convicted of criminal contempt of court. This stems from a 2007 racial-profiling case, Melendres v. Arpaio, in which Hispanic plaintiffs alleged that sheriff’s deputies discriminated against Latinos in traffic stops.

In 2013, U.S. District Judge G. Murray Snow found the sheriff’s office engaged in systemic racial profiling of Latinos in its anti-illegal-immigration efforts. Snow ordered the agency to stop detaining people solely because they were suspected of being undocumented.

But Arpaio resisted. He was charged with, then convicted of, criminal contempt of court for intentionally violating Snow’s order. Arpaio’s attorneys now are asking U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton for a new trial or to reconsider her verdict, arguing Arpaio was wrongfully denied a jury trial. Typically, a jury trial is not required when the defendant’s maximum sentence is six months in jail — which Arpaio faces at his October sentencing.

 

[church mouse guy]

In what way?
Analysis | What you need to know about former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio’s record on illegal immigration

In July 2017, Arpaio was convicted of criminal contempt of court. This stems from a 2007 racial-profiling case, Melendres v. Arpaio, in which Hispanic plaintiffs alleged that sheriff’s deputies discriminated against Latinos in traffic stops.

In 2013, U.S. District Judge G. Murray Snow found the sheriff’s office engaged in systemic racial profiling of Latinos in its anti-illegal-immigration efforts. Snow ordered the agency to stop detaining people solely because they were suspected of being undocumented.

But Arpaio resisted. He was charged with, then convicted of, criminal contempt of court for intentionally violating Snow’s order. Arpaio’s attorneys now are asking U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton for a new trial or to reconsider her verdict, arguing Arpaio was wrongfully denied a jury trial. Typically, a jury trial is not required when the defendant’s maximum sentence is six months in jail — which Arpaio faces at his October sentencing.

The Sheriff is right that prison is a liberal paradise.

If the case were sent all the way to the supreme court, Joe would have been cleared but Trump saved him the time and expense. The court had no right to issue a decree contrary to federal law.

Prison is a liberal paradise--everything is free and only law enforcement has guns--sort of like Venezuela.

 

[FollowTheWay]

The Sheriff is right that prison is a liberal paradise.

If the case were sent all the way to the supreme court, Joe would have been cleared but Trump saved him the time and expense. The court had no right to issue a decree contrary to federal law.

Prison is a liberal paradise--everything is free and only law enforcement has guns--sort of like Venezuela.

You keep saying that prison is a liberal paradise. That's ridiculous. Why can you say for certain that the Sheriff would have won in the Supreme Court? He broke the law like a common criminal.

 

[church mouse guy]

Prison is a liberal paradise--everything is provided by the government, private property is confiscated, and no one has a gun except law enforcement.