Do You think this is a fair assesement on Liberalism.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Not anymore.Do You think this is a fair assesement on Liberalism.
It is true that today's Democrats are not JFK Democrats.Not anymore.
Under JFK the Wikipedia Model fits but went into a power-crash beginning with LBJ and the Great Society.
Failed miserably, LBJ then had a temper tantrum and refused reelection.
Can you imagine what kind of reaction would come out the globalist liberal press and party for the following statement (or a 21st century Tweet) :It is true that today's Democrats are not JFK Democrats.
"Liberalism in the United States is a broad political philosophy centered on what many see as the unalienable rights of the individual".
Obviously from the first sentence we can see that what Wiki has posted is false. This is garbage, nothing but garbage.
LIberalism was not responsible for the civil rights act of 1964. Democrats were in fact against it.
No. The article covers a lot of ground and indicates definitions have shifted. The first paragraph is correct that early American thought was a type of liberalism—the type conservatives seek to conserve—the type concerned with unalienable rights as enshrined in the founding documents, including the Bill of Rights.Do You think this is a fair assesement on Liberalism.
What will be missing?That's the history they continue to seek to revise. Some day it will be missing from the history books entirely.
Liberalism as opposition to monarchism, yep.No. The article covers a lot of ground and indicates definitions have shifted. The first paragraph is correct that early American thought was a type of liberalism—the type conservatives seek to conserve—the type concerned with unalienable rights as enshrined in the founding documents, including the Bill of Rights.
However, "separation of church and state" is foreign to that thinking, since the influence of religion is fundamental to instilling the requisite moral responsibility for enjoying those rights and freedoms.
The second paragraph is naturally way off. "Modern liberalism" has abandoned the original fundamentals in favor of perversions that essentially undermine and oppose the much earlier concept. What "modern liberals" call liberating and progressive has just the opposite effect on society. Their ideology is cloaked in euphemism designed to deceive those who think superficially or not at all.