From - years ago, that was NEVER proven, unlike Bill stain was?His own testimony.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
From - years ago, that was NEVER proven, unlike Bill stain was?His own testimony.
Ah, the Hans Frank defence: "It was a long time ago and anyway I'm a Christian now so it doesn't matter."from - years ago,?
LOL: an admission of guilt is proof!From - years ago, that was NEVER proven, unlike Bill stain was?
No, more like was crude talk, but nothing substantial hapopened, and was several years ago. What as Trump been doing since President?Ah, the Hans Frank defence: "It was a long time ago and anyway I'm a Christian now so it doesn't matter."
Not impressed
No. Do you acknowledge that, by his very own testimony he admitted to grabbing women by their vaginas and that therefore it beggars belief that people should vote for such a creature, still less those who would call themselves Christians?So you do ackwoledge that at best Trump has been accused of kissing other women while single man, and that whatever he did was basically crude talking from years ago? Nothing with past several years, and was just a witch hunt to try to get him derailed by fake news?
was that the infamous locker room talk, where he was bragging and talking? Never was proven?No. Do you acknowledge that, by his very own testimony he admitted to grabbing women by their vaginas and that therefore it beggars belief that people should vote for such a creature, still less those who would call themselves Christians?
Ok, let me spell it out for you: it was an admission, nay a boast, of committing sexual assault . If you can't or won't see that then God alone can help youNo, more like was crude talk, but nothing substantial hapopened, and was several years ago. What as Trump been doing since President?
Whataboutism again. Leave it.You do know that was locker room talk, not the same as proven in court, as was for Bill!
Ok, this is clearly a dialogue of the deaf with someone who is (possibly wilfully) ignorant on the subject. I can say no morewas that the infamous locker room talk, where he was bragging and talking? Never was proven?
No, just someone who refuses to get sucked into the liberal/dem/.fake news attempt to undermine the president, as they still are crying that he beat Hilliary! Almost like suffering from shell shocked syndrome...Ok, this is clearly a dialogue of the deaf with someone who is (possibly wilfully) ignorant on the subject. I can say no more
And I'm sure Hans Frank really changed before he mounted the scaffold at Nuremberg. Doesn't mean that he deserved to escape human justice.How about focusing on him since started to run, and since election, as he seems to have really changed!
You made the claim first. If you’re not going to answer it go jump in a lake with all of your questions from now on. ‘K?False start.... let’s start here. How could a Christian support a scumbag liar, cheat, deviant, adulter like Trump?
Pound sand. This is common knowledge.Show me the court decisions. The verdicts
I understand that you find it irrelevant, but in the sbc church I attended, you must take an in depth series of classes to join that church, where you learn about the SBC & what they stand for. So it isn’t as irrelevant as one might think. I get that not all baptists are sbc affiliated, or some don’t care. For me, if it goes left again this year, the handwriting will be on the wall. I won’t consider an sbc church again.And I’m getting out of this thread because I don’t give a rat’s patootie about who’s leading the SBC.