Lacy Evans
New Member
Why did the teaching of a longer trib fall out of consideration?
http://www.kingdombaptist.org/article599.cfm
There are many scriptural difficulties that are resolved by a longer period between the rapture and the second coming. Ezekiel 29:10 Ezekiel 32:7
Lacy
From:Premillennial/Dispensational Teachers from Earlier Generations on the Length of the Period from the Rapture to the start of the Millennium
Clarence Larkin in 1919:
"But I hear a protest. How you say can we be expecting Jesus to come at 'any moment' if the city of Babylon must be rebuilt before He can come? There is not a word in Scripture that says that Jesus cannot come and take away His Church until Babylon is rebuilt. The Church may be taken out of the world 25 or even 50 years before that." ("The Book of Revelation," p.162)
George N.H. Peters in 1884:
"...writers now generally attribute to this introductory manifestation a period of seven years, of forty years, and of (thirty and forty conjoined) seventy years. (Considering the events to follow the Advent before the overthrow of Antichrist...the longer periods are preferable....We...make the interval [between the two stages of the Advent] not less than seventy-five years, and the seven years we date only from the time that a covenant is made by Antichrist with the Jewish nation. The interval...must be lengthy seeing that in it we have a renewed proclamation of the Gospel, the partial restoration of the Jews, the development of the Antichrist with the ten horns, the fall of Babylon, etc.." ("The Theocratic Kingdom," Vol.2, pp.315, 709)
Joseph Seiss in 1865:
"The second coming, like the first, is complex and distributive, extending through a variety of successive and diverse scenes, stages, events, and manifestations...Just what length of time will intervene between the first and sudden catching away of the watching and ready saints, and the final overthrow of Babylon and Antichrist, we may not be able precisely to determine; but I am fully persuaded that it will be a goodly number of years. Antichrist reigns for a full week of years, - that is seven years,- three and a half as the friend and patron of Israelitish people, and three and a half as the great Beast...How many years those seals and the six trumpets may consume we are not informed, but we have every reason to believe that they may be counted by tens, if not by scores...Forty years, at least, perhaps a whole jubilee period of fifty years, or even a full seventy years, answering to the period during which the judgment was upon Israel for its sins..." ("Lectures on the Apocalypse," pp.161, 162)
Robert Govett (1813-1901):
"The Presence [i.e. invisible presence of Christ in the heavens from the time of the rapture till the end of the Tribulation period] must last at least four years, and may last forty or fifty."
Billy Sunday in 1913:
"It is supposed that the Tribulation will cover a period of seven years. It might be seven hundred years; but it cannot be less than seven years." ("The Second Coming")
A.G. Tilney in 1938:
"The resurrection period may well last 40 years..."
("The Dawn")
James R. Graves in 1887:
"Commentators are not agreed as to the length of this [Tribulation] period. Some think it is indicated by the time that elapsed between the translation of Enoch and the flood..." ("Dispensational Expositions of the Prophecies of Christ")
E.W. Bullinger (1837-1913):
"...after the church is caught up...these seven years may be the Telos or last seven of some thirty or forty years...These events may occupy a similar period of thirty-three years for ought we know; and if to these we add the seven years of the last week of Daniel we have a period of forty years." ("Commentary on Revelation," pp.348, 249)
http://www.kingdombaptist.org/article599.cfm
There are many scriptural difficulties that are resolved by a longer period between the rapture and the second coming. Ezekiel 29:10 Ezekiel 32:7
Lacy