OK folks. Here's a new angle alltogether from someone who is out to debunk Lou Martuneac's book In Defense of the Gospel, Nathan Busenitz.
Is this accurate, why or why not? Is he referring to loving Christ ONCE one is converted, or is the love of Christ needed FOR salvation? If it's the former, his view of LS doesn't square with JM or Mr. Goodman.
Is this accurate, why or why not? Is he referring to loving Christ ONCE one is converted, or is the love of Christ needed FOR salvation? If it's the former, his view of LS doesn't square with JM or Mr. Goodman.
http://www.sfpulpit.com/2006/11/09/hey-i-thought-the-lordship-discussion-was-over-part-1/I’m sure that some of our readers found our lordship series a bit overwhelming—just keeping up with the comments was a daunting task. I couldn’t even read every comment, and I’m the site administrator! So I wanted to condense everything down and summarize it as best I can.
The lordship position teaches that salvation occurs at the moment of conversion, and that conversion includes a change of heart such that those who were enemies of Christ now love Him.
That’s pretty much it.
Lordship teaches that true Christians love Jesus. And that those who do not love Jesus are not true Christians.
Last edited by a moderator: