Making Sense of Obama’s Foreign Policy

[poncho]

On February 22nd, NBC’s “Meet the Press” presented reporter Richard Engel in a terrific four-minute documentary on Barack Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s catastrophic policy-results in Libya. (You can watch it by clicking on that link.) The segment concluded that Obama and his Administration (including Hillary Clinton) didn’t know where they were going in this operation. That was a ‘kindly’ interpretation, but Obama isn’t really so stupid. He’s a leader, with a clear vision of what he wants, and he subordinates everything to it. Whereas Obama did indeed destroy Libya and (like G.W. Bush’s venture in Iraq) enormously boost Islamic extremism and terrorism (and the main expert that Engel interviewed in that segment has written extensively on this regarding specifically the Libyan case, here and here), Obama knew what his goal was, and he achieved it there, even though it wasn’t to boost Islamic extremism, nor was it to destroy Libya; he actually had his eye on a different ball altogether. Something is an even bigger concern to him than fighting terrorism, or than the welfare of people in Libya or any other foreign country; and this is consistently what guides his decisions in international affairs.

Read More At: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/02/making-sense-obamas-foreign-policy.html

 

[righteousdude2]

Well, personally, I would give you two cents for his foreign policy! :smilewinkgrin::smilewinkgrin:

 

[poncho]

Well, personally, I would give you two cents for his foreign policy! :smilewinkgrin::smilewinkgrin:

Oh I think you're already paying much more than that for it. $mile, you're already on the hook for it.

 

[church mouse guy]

Obama has a libertarian foreign policy.

 

[carpro]

Reading through, it didn't take long for the author to destroy his own credibility.

 

[carpro]

Obama's foreign policy can be summed up in one sentence:

Anger our friends and cozy up to our enemies.

 

[poncho]

Obama Prioritizes Weakening Russia, Over Weakening ISIS

Michael Snyder noted at Global Research on March 1st, that the U.S. is now air-dropping weapons into ISIS territory inside Syria. The U.S. is arming ISIS against Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad, whom Obama wants to remove. Snyder asks rhetorically: “We have the most sophisticated military on the entire planet and yet we drop weapons into the hands of the enemy by mistake? Come on.” Can it be that the U.S. Air Force doesn’t have maps showing the half of Syria that’s controlled by ISIS? Of course not. ISIS’s chunk of the country constitutes almost the entire northeastern half of Syria.

Snyder further notes: “When it comes to airstrikes [against ISIS], the Obama administration has had an ‘Iraq first’ policy. This has put ISIS on a defensive posture in Iraq, but this has actually encouraged expansion of ISIS in Syria. ISIS is just following the path of least resistance. Is Obama trying to discourage ISIS from committing troops and resources in Iraq because he actually wants them to focus on taking down the Assad regime in Syria?”

Well, it’s certainly working. Snyder also notes that, “ISIS has almost doubled the land it controls in Syria since the US-led coalition began airstrikes against the extremist group in the summer, a new map has revealed.” He points out the obvious conclusion: “Obama knows all of this. He just wants to take down Assad.”

He closes with the question: “So is Barack Obama actually trying to help ISIS take over Syria?” However, Snyder ignores one crucial thing: the reason why Obama is so obsessed with causing regime-change in Syria.

Read More At: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/03/obama-prioritizes-weakening-russia-weakening-isis.html

The neocon's have always seen Russia as the number one threat to Washington's "uni-polar global hegemony". Going back to before even the PNAC days.

Obama is just following the bipartisan approved neocon foreign policy.