Man Claims Hillary ‘Forcibly Kissed Him’ on a flight in 1979

[Use of Time]

You don't seem to understand what the bible says. It says that it takes two or three witnesses AGAINST a person to establish it as true, not two or three witnesses to acquit him.

Without two or three witnesses it is just gossip.

Yeah gossip. Take a look at the thread we are posting in and then look at the posts that you are patting yourself on the back for. You've almost got it... don't give up!

 

[InTheLight]

I'm shocked how this scandalous attack against a man can just be ignored by #NeverTrump-ers who can't see past their blinders and simply stay on the agenda to attack the only opposition to this perverted woman!! It is beyond belief the lengths people will go to support Hillary Clinton's movement. Outright appalling!

Your attempt to portray me (and others) as a Hillary supporter is pathetic. We noticed there was no rebuttal to my post, but that's the usual "debate" technique of Trump supporters.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo

 

[Use of Time]

Your attempt to portray me (and others) as a Hillary supporter is pathetic. We noticed there was no rebuttal to my post, but that's the usual "debate" technique of Trump supporters.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo

They have all handled this tough week with their usual grace and class.

 

[Salty]

Your attempt to portray me (and others) as a Hillary supporter is pathetic. We noticed there was no rebuttal to my post, but that's the usual "debate" technique of Trump supporters.

Then for us latecommers - who do you plan on voting for in Nov?

 

[InTheLight]

Then for us latecommers - who do you plan on voting for in Nov?

For the nth time: I'm not voting for President, but will vote in state and local elections. I will vote for the Republican candidates for every contest except perhaps my state house member. He's only in his early 20s and the Democrat opponent is fiscally conservative, so I might vote for him.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo

 

[Benjamin]

Your attempt to portray me (and others) as a Hillary supporter is pathetic. We noticed there was no rebuttal to my post, but that's the usual "debate" technique of Trump supporters.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo

Just a little satire of revealing the "usual "debate" technique of #NeverTrump supporters"... by directly imitating one of their common arguments...

 

[Use of Time]

Still crying

 

[Salty]

For the nth time: I'm not voting for President, but will vote in state and local elections. I will vote for the Republican candidates for every contest except perhaps my state house member. He's only in his early 20s and the Democrat opponent is fiscally conservative, so I might vote for him.

When you and thousands of others refuse to vote - you are helping the other candidate to win.

 

[just-want-peace]

When you and thousands of others refuse to vote - you are helping the other candidate to win.

Amazing that this little fact is so conviently pigeon-holed; or perhaps just ignored!?

Might check out this site also:

http://townhall.com/columnists/lizcrokin/2016/07/10/trump-does-the-unthinkable-n2190160

 

[InTheLight]

When you and thousands of others refuse to vote - you are helping the other candidate to win.

By voting for neither I am helping the other candidate win.

Which other candidate is going to win if I vote for neither of them?

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

[Salty]

Amazing that this little fact is so conviently pigeon-holed; or perhaps just ignored!?

Might check out this site also:

http://townhall.com/columnists/lizcrokin/2016/07/10/trump-does-the-unthinkable-n2190160

Are you tying to confuse people with the facts?

 

[Alcott]

By voting for neither I am helping the other candidate win.

Which other candidate is going to win if I vote for neither of them?

Martin Luther King seemed to hold a different view of such a situation that you do. He said in his book, Why We Can't Wait, that he thinks the biggest obstruction to racial equality was not the Ku Klux Klan or the White Citizens Councils, but the "white moderate," who said he is willing to accept change when it's inevitable, but in the meantime willingly keeps on living with the way of things as they are without complaint. He elaborates and says those who just accept things as they are, including their own privileges, deter the greater justice by being content and not actively working for it.

 

[blessedwife318]

Martin Luther King seemed to hold a different view of such a situation that you do. He said in his book, Why We Can't Wait, that he thinks the biggest obstruction to racial equality was not the Ku Klux Klan or the White Citizens Councils, but the "white moderate," who said he is willing to accept change when it's inevitable, but in the meantime willingly keeps on living with the way of things as they are without complaint. He elaborates and says those who just accept things as they are, including their own privileges, deter the greater justice by being content and not actively working for it.

I view this as progress, as those who say we must vote for one of the 2 parties are the ones willing to keep things the way they are. Those of us who have had enough of the 2 party system are the ones working for something different. Keep up this line of thinking and you'll get where us Never Trumpers have been for awhile.



Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

[InTheLight]

Martin Luther King seemed to hold a different view of such a situation that you do. He said in his book, Why We Can't Wait, that he thinks the biggest obstruction to racial equality was not the Ku Klux Klan or the White Citizens Councils, but the "white moderate," who said he is willing to accept change when it's inevitable, but in the meantime willingly keeps on living with the way of things as they are without complaint. He elaborates and says those who just accept things as they are, including their own privileges, deter the greater justice by being content and not actively working for it.

The King of the non sequitur strikes again!


Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

[HankD]

I view this as progress, as those who say we must vote for one of the 2 parties are the ones willing to keep things the way they are. Those of us who have had enough of the 2 party system are the ones working for something different. Keep up this line of thinking and you'll get where us Never Trumpers have been for awhile.



Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Personally I believe 1) The two party system has ended and 2) Hillary will in all probability win because of the collective ignorance of both parties along with the populace at large.

Hillary winning IMO will sooner or later (probably sooner) "evolve" into a Marxist regime - And yes it can happen in America if the general populace wants it - either via ignorance as "the sheeple" or as loyal comrades of the New Democratic Party.

Count me out.

HankD

 

[Alcott]

The King of the non sequitur strikes again

Oh, he was that?

 

[InTheLight]

Oh, he was that?

Who is Oh, and what was he?

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo

 

[carpro]

Since you've trapped yourself I never really expected an answer. You and Carpro are consistent like that.

Mainly the problem is,JG, to Clinton apologists like you, it's OK for them but not for Trump. You're consistent like that.

 

[carpro]

No they don't because I took a scholarship with the Army 15 years ago.

They wasted their money. You didn't get an education. You got an indoctrination.

 

[carpro]

The hypocrisy is glaring for all who aren't blinded by hatred of the Clinton's.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Yes it is. It's OK for the Clinton's but not for Trump. You look at it just like they do.

Hillary has no moral authority to make any sexual assault claims against anyone. Yet she keeps riding that train and taking you along for the ride.