poncho
Well-Known Member
Craig Roberts
October 18, 2005
NewsWithViews.com
Arthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington, famous for defeating Napoleon's Grande Armee at Waterloo, once said "I've spent my entire life trying to discover what the fellow on the other side of the hill was up to."
And so it is with intelligence gathering and analysis. As a former intel analyst, I've spent many years on various missions beginning in the mid-1980s and going beyond Desert Storm taking pieces of the "global threat puzzle" and trying to fit the pieces together to discover what the "other fellow" was up to, and what he would do next.
In the past two decades I have witnessed a series of events that are extremely disturbing. Events, that if put together as pieces of a puzzle, seem to form a picture that is most disturbing-and even terrifying. Taken alone, they mean little. But taken in whole, the mosaic forms more than just a pattern-one that is planned, mission-oriented, and taking place almost as if there were a list of events that must occur to accomplish the final mission.
The "final mission" is two-fold: destruction of nation-states, and establishment of a New Age global-socialist New World Order.
For those who think this is "conspiracy theory," or simply fear-factor-fiction, let me ask this: Do you think the US Constitution is intact, and is this the same country as it was fifty years ago? If not, why not? And what and who caused the change?
Let's all play intelligence analyst. We'll do this by examining the reports, putting the pieces on the wall and seeing what kind of picture it forms. Here are the clues:
On To The Rest Of PART ONE
Craig Roberts
October 18, 2005
NewsWithViews.com
During the Clinton administration, the military was basically reduced-I would use the word "destroyed"-by not only reduction in forces and personnel and equipment and bases, but by chasing off the best officers and NCOs this country had in uniform at the time. I know of many of my cohorts who loved their country and military careers, but became so disenchanted with the Clintons' anti-military doctrines and abhorrence of the military that they either hung up their boots and became civilians, or took early retirement. It was during this time that political correctness was shoved down the throats of fighting units: females were put into harm's way in front line or near units; homosexuals were "accepted" by the "don't ask, don't tell" doctrine; and combined male/female combat support units and ships and aircraft came into being. The Clintons'mission was to destroy the military, or at least reduce it to a shadow of what was required to defend this country. (It was also a mission of the Clinton administration to reduce the firepower of the average American citizen with new, draconian "gun control" laws-after all, any invading force in the future would not want to face a few million armed American "guerrillas").
It was during this time that Islamic terrorist organizations grew and flourished, and Clinton did little, if anything, about it. It was almost as if he-or his globalist puppet masters-wanted such a movement to grow and become even stronger.
Then it was George W. Bush's turn.
On To The Rest Of PART TWO
Paul Craig Roberts
October 18, 2005
NewsWithViews.com
Arthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington, famous for defeating Napoleon's Grande Armee at Waterloo, once said "I've spent my entire life trying to discover what the fellow on the other side of the hill was up to."
And so it is with intelligence gathering and analysis. As a former intel analyst, I've spent many years on various missions beginning in the mid-1980s and going beyond Desert Storm taking pieces of the "global threat puzzle" and trying to fit the pieces together to discover what the "other fellow" was up to, and what he would do next.
In the past two decades I have witnessed a series of events that are extremely disturbing. Events, that if put together as pieces of a puzzle, seem to form a picture that is most disturbing-and even terrifying. Taken alone, they mean little. But taken in whole, the mosaic forms more than just a pattern-one that is planned, mission-oriented, and taking place almost as if there were a list of events that must occur to accomplish the final mission.
The "final mission" is two-fold: destruction of nation-states, and establishment of a New Age global-socialist New World Order.
For those who think this is "conspiracy theory," or simply fear-factor-fiction, let me ask this: Do you think the US Constitution is intact, and is this the same country as it was fifty years ago? If not, why not? And what and who caused the change?
Let's all play intelligence analyst. We'll do this by examining the reports, putting the pieces on the wall and seeing what kind of picture it forms. Here are the clues:
On To The Rest Of PART ONE
Craig Roberts
October 18, 2005
NewsWithViews.com
During the Clinton administration, the military was basically reduced-I would use the word "destroyed"-by not only reduction in forces and personnel and equipment and bases, but by chasing off the best officers and NCOs this country had in uniform at the time. I know of many of my cohorts who loved their country and military careers, but became so disenchanted with the Clintons' anti-military doctrines and abhorrence of the military that they either hung up their boots and became civilians, or took early retirement. It was during this time that political correctness was shoved down the throats of fighting units: females were put into harm's way in front line or near units; homosexuals were "accepted" by the "don't ask, don't tell" doctrine; and combined male/female combat support units and ships and aircraft came into being. The Clintons'mission was to destroy the military, or at least reduce it to a shadow of what was required to defend this country. (It was also a mission of the Clinton administration to reduce the firepower of the average American citizen with new, draconian "gun control" laws-after all, any invading force in the future would not want to face a few million armed American "guerrillas").
It was during this time that Islamic terrorist organizations grew and flourished, and Clinton did little, if anything, about it. It was almost as if he-or his globalist puppet masters-wanted such a movement to grow and become even stronger.
Then it was George W. Bush's turn.
On To The Rest Of PART TWO

Paul Craig Robert's BioPaul Craig Roberts is the John M. Olin fellow at the Institute for
Political Economy, research fellow at the Independent Institute and senior
research fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. A former
editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal, he writes a political
commentary column for Creators Syndicate. He also writes a monthly
economics column for Investors Business Daily . In 1992, he received the
Warren Brookes Award for Excellence in Journalism. In 1993, he was ranked
as one of the top seven journalists by the Forbes Media Guide.
He was distinguished fellow at the Cato Institute from 1993 to 1996. From
1982 through 1993, he held the William E. Simon chair in political economy
at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. From 1981 to 1982,
he served as assistant secretary of the Treasury for economic policy.
President Reagan and Treasury Secretary Regan credited him with a major
role in the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, and he was awarded the
Treasury Department's Meritorious Service Award for "his outstanding
contributions to the formulation of United States economic policy." From
1975 to 1978, Dr. Roberts served on the congressional staff where he
drafted the Kemp-Roth bill and played a leading role in developing
bipartisan support for a supply-side economic policy.