Thinkingstuff
Active Member
I was speaking to my father who says the rosary occassionally. We got into a big argument about it. And as usually happens he tells me how messed up protestants are and I tell him that he needs to get saved. However, he was espousing this Hail Holy Queen prayer. Now the rosary is broken down into several parts. the first part has a crucifix then five beads each representing a set of prayers you pray then you have what is known as five decades. Or section of 10 beads seperated by a bead between each decade. The mechanics are you start by reciting the Signum Crucis (sign of the cross) then Symbolum Apostolorum (the Apostles' creed) then the Pater Noster also known as the Oratio Dominicae (the Our Father) all on the first bead then 3 Ave Maria or Salutatio Angelica (Hail Mary's) on the next 3 beads then the Gloria Patri or Doxologia Minor (Glory be) and Oratio Fatima or the Fatima prayer both on that bead. Then you pray a Pater Noster and 10 Ave Marias with the Gloria Patri and Oratio Fatima in succession five times ending this long list of prayer with Hail Holy Queen and while in community the Angelus. Sounds like a lot of babaling. Anyway, Today each of the five set of decades the Catholics focus on the "Glorious Mysteries". 1) the resurrection 2) the assention of Jesus 3) and the decent of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost 4) the Assumption of Mary and 5) the coronation of Mary in heaven.
First of all that's a lot of repetition and if you are focusing on something else why mumbling words to prayers I'm sure Marcia would say that is a form of eastern meditation. The spoken words act like a Mandala which is a visual relaxation technique where by you look at very semetrical pictures and can consentrate on meanings of things. the only difference I see is on is of verbal design and the other visual.
Next I bring into question an aspect of tradition with regard to the "glorious mysteries". If the Catholics are right about their tradition being Apostolic in origin then I have a serious question. Every important aspect of faith they thought was significant and basic to the believer they pretty much wrote it down. The Catholic can argue John 6 with regard to the Eucharist. Ok fine. Yet don't you think that if veneration (as it is practiced today) of Mary was key to spiritual promises as the Catholic church claims then wouldn't this even be aluded to in scripture? If such an important event like Mary was crowned in heaven to be its queen second only to God himself then wouldn't you think that scripture would allude to this? Yet the apostles vigorous in giving the promise of every spiritual gift and promise of God failed to mention this
No in fact they don't. Then the Catholic argument is that the rosary was given to St. Dominic in the 12th century. Ah but how is this tradition apostolic? How then is the veneration of Mary apostolic? If Mary was so important to the early community of believers then why is their no consensus on what happened to her? She went to live with John. And as far as scriptures that is it. According to Orthodox she died in southern Turkey and recieved an early resurrection which they call the Dormition. The Catholics don't have any idea where she was Assumed at but are certain she did and that she was crowned queen of heaven. This also by logic and reason cannot be apostolic because John ended up on Patmos and wrote a few letters and never said anything about it. And As I read the Patritic writings I find that the Gospel message is pretty much the same as the scritpures they quote. Their is not much diviation or apealing to "Apostolic Tradition" outside of what is already mentioned in scripture.
First of all that's a lot of repetition and if you are focusing on something else why mumbling words to prayers I'm sure Marcia would say that is a form of eastern meditation. The spoken words act like a Mandala which is a visual relaxation technique where by you look at very semetrical pictures and can consentrate on meanings of things. the only difference I see is on is of verbal design and the other visual.
Next I bring into question an aspect of tradition with regard to the "glorious mysteries". If the Catholics are right about their tradition being Apostolic in origin then I have a serious question. Every important aspect of faith they thought was significant and basic to the believer they pretty much wrote it down. The Catholic can argue John 6 with regard to the Eucharist. Ok fine. Yet don't you think that if veneration (as it is practiced today) of Mary was key to spiritual promises as the Catholic church claims then wouldn't this even be aluded to in scripture? If such an important event like Mary was crowned in heaven to be its queen second only to God himself then wouldn't you think that scripture would allude to this? Yet the apostles vigorous in giving the promise of every spiritual gift and promise of God failed to mention this
1. Whoever shall faithfully serve me by the recitation of the Rosary, shall receive signal graces.
2. I promise my special protection and the greatest graces to all those who shall recite the Rosary.
3. The Rosary shall be a powerful armor against hell, it will destroy vice, decrease sin, and defeat heresies.
4. It will cause virtue and good works to flourish; it will obtain for souls the abundant mercy of God; it will withdraw the hearts of people from the love of the world and its vanities, and will lift them to the desire of eternal things. Oh, that souls would sanctify themselves by this means.
5. The soul which recommends itself to me by the recitation of the Rosary, shall not perish.
6. Whoever shall recite the Rosary devoutly, applying himself to the consideration of its Sacred Mysteries shall never be conquered by misfortune. God will not chastise him in His justice, he shall not perish by an unprovided death; if he be just, he shall remain in the grace of God, and become worthy of eternal life.
7. Whoever shall have a true devotion for the Rosary shall not die without the Sacraments of the Church.
8. Those who are faithful to recite the Rosary shall have during their life and at their death the light of God and the plentitude of His graces; at the moment of death they shall participate in the merits of the Saints in Paradise.
9. I shall deliver from purgatory those who have been devoted to the Rosary.
10. The faithful children of the Rosary shall merit a high degree of glory in Heaven.
11. You shall obtain all you ask of me by the recitation of the Rosary.
12. All those who propagate the Holy Rosary shall be aided by me in their necessities.
13. I have obtained from my Divine Son that all the advocates of the Rosary shall have for intercessors the entire celestial court during their life and at the hour of death.
14. All who recite the Rosary are my children, and brothers and sisters of my only Son, Jesus Christ.
15. Devotion of my Rosary is a great sign of predestination.
No in fact they don't. Then the Catholic argument is that the rosary was given to St. Dominic in the 12th century. Ah but how is this tradition apostolic? How then is the veneration of Mary apostolic? If Mary was so important to the early community of believers then why is their no consensus on what happened to her? She went to live with John. And as far as scriptures that is it. According to Orthodox she died in southern Turkey and recieved an early resurrection which they call the Dormition. The Catholics don't have any idea where she was Assumed at but are certain she did and that she was crowned queen of heaven. This also by logic and reason cannot be apostolic because John ended up on Patmos and wrote a few letters and never said anything about it. And As I read the Patritic writings I find that the Gospel message is pretty much the same as the scritpures they quote. Their is not much diviation or apealing to "Apostolic Tradition" outside of what is already mentioned in scripture.