Mass Murder In America

[Crabtownboy]

Why does the right wing remain quiet on this topic? Why is there no outrage by the right-wing.

Mass murder is defined by the killing of 4 or more people?

Who poses the most danger to Amercians, ISIS or other Americans?

Who has killed the most Americans ISIS or Americans?

Since 2006, there have been more than 200 mass killings in the United States.

Well-known images from Newtown, Aurora and Virginia Tech capture the nation’s attention, but similar bloody scenes happen with alarming frequency and much less scrutiny.

USA TODAY examined FBI data -- which defines a mass killing as four or more victims -- as well as local police records and media reports to understand mass killings in America. They happen far more often than the government reports, and the circumstances of those killings -- the people who commit them, the weapons they use and the forces that motivate them -- are far more predictable than many might think.

Yet no one is keeping track.

http://www.gannett-cdn.com/GDContent/mass-killings/index.html#title

 

[Revmitchell]

Who has killed the most Americans ?

Planned Parenthood. Why is there no outcry from you about the slaughter of unborn children in this country?

 

[Kevin]

Why does the right wing remain quiet on this topic? Why is there no outrage by the right-wing.

Mass murder is defined by the killing of 4 or more people?

Who poses the most danger to Amercians, ISIS or other Americans?

Who has killed the most Americans ISIS or Americans?

My thinking is that your question about who has killed more Americans is going to have a huge swing towards isis or musloms, probably within a year. I'm sure they will be working on something 9/11 big, and with obamo's plan to import them, the odds go up.

No where near the number of executions the US government participates in at abortion clinics around the country, I hope.

 

[Alcott]

Maybe there's no outrage because we think mass murder should be defined as *5* or more .

 

[annsni]

I think what I'd need to know is:

* What were the circumstances of the mass killing?
* How were the guns obtained?
* What is the result of the killing?

That makes a big difference in my book.

 

[Squire Robertsson]

Does the St. Valentine's Day Massacre qualify as a "mass murder"? If so would the gunmen have obeyed today's gun laws?

I think what I'd need to know is:

* What were the circumstances of the mass killing?
* How were the guns obtained?
* What is the result of the killing?

That makes a big difference in my book.

 

[Kevin]

Does the St. Valentine's Day Massacre qualify as a "mass murder"? If so would the gunmen have obeyed today's gun laws?

I believe that would be considered "Work Place Violence" Biggrin

Well if it had been in a declared "Gun Free Zone" of course they would have obeyed the law.

 

[Salty]

Crabby, you mentioned 3 situations - none of which has any connection, except with the possiblity that the shooters were all loners.
ISIS is organized with a common objective.

But the bottom line is that we are concerned with all mass killings.