Heavenly Pilgrim
New Member
Biblicist, all you are doing is showing the entire universe you have no ability to stay focused on the text itself, but rather ignore the actual verse in question and the GK text concerning it. If one desires a clear example of a proof text'tr, Biblicist is a shining example of one so far. All he is interested in is making a doctrinal statement from any text he so desires without careful or critical examination of the truth of the text whatsoever.
When we get to the other texts Biblicist refers to, and if I try, as he is doing here, to make them walk on all four legs without clear support from the GK in the text itself in question, (as Biblicist here is bent on doing with this text) I should be taken to task just as I will take Biblicist to task for his actions thus far with this text. But for now, we are dealing with Matt. 19:16-17 alone. I do not care how contradictory it may appear with any other text period. I want to find the plain simple meaning of this verse from the GK to the best of my abilities.
When we get to the other texts Biblicist refers to, and if I try, as he is doing here, to make them walk on all four legs without clear support from the GK in the text itself in question, (as Biblicist here is bent on doing with this text) I should be taken to task just as I will take Biblicist to task for his actions thus far with this text. But for now, we are dealing with Matt. 19:16-17 alone. I do not care how contradictory it may appear with any other text period. I want to find the plain simple meaning of this verse from the GK to the best of my abilities.