• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Matt 18 and Forgiveness Revoked

Tazman

New Member
Steaver,

Did you even read John 15 and follow my suggestion.

I heard it once said on this forum, to a hammer everything is a nail.

Put your hammer down and read you bible!

Steaver said:
Jesus taught..."For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast".
I don't recall Jesus saying that, not that it's not true or anything, but you will never truly understand it because you have blinders on to Jesus' teachings.
That is why you do not accept what Jesus Say's.

Why didn't you respond to John 15?

Thats why
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Why didn't you respond to John 15?
Brother, you will not properly understand much of the meat of the Word unless you first take it upon yourself to understand, through much prayer to God, the milk. It begins with understanding born-again and salvation is "not of yourselves".

Here is the best teaching I have seen on John 15. I am sure it will probably run off you like water off a duck's back. You are stuck on your interpretations and I don't see any willingness on your part to see it any other way but your own. For the sake of those who want to learn, here it is...

15:1. The true vine. In the Old Testament, Israel is referred to as a vine. However, in this verse, we find the True or Real Vine is Christ Himself. The husbandman. The Father is the husbandman , or the One who owns the vineyard and who takes care of it.
2. He taketh away. Just as the husbandman disposes of branches that bear no fruit, so the Father judges those who bear no spiritual fruit. He purgeth it. The husbandman prunes the branches which bear fruit in order for them to bear more fruit . In like manner, God the Father cleanses Christians who are bearing fruit to bring them to bear more fruit. Fruit is the natural product of a living organism. Spiritual fruit is a spiritual product of a spiritual union (Gal 5:22-23).
3. Cleansing is produced through the Word of God.
4. Abide in me. In order to be a fruitful Christian, one must learn to depend on Christ and let the power and Spirit of Christ flow through him.
5. Christ now clearly states the implications of this story. He is the vine and we are the branches. Note the total dependence upon the Vine. Without that abiding relationship ye can do nothing . In verse 2 it refers to more fruit , and in verse 5 and 8 it refers to much fruit .
6. This does not refer to everlasting punishment in hell. Note that there are results of not abiding in Christ as a branch. The man himself is not the branch; the branch represents the fruits of his relationship with Christ. When the Christian fails to abide in Christ, he withers, dries up, and his fruits or works will be judged by fire (1 Cor 3:12-15).
7-8. Those who abide in Christ, and who permit His words to abide in them, have a blessed promise that Christ will perform whatever they ask. This is a blessed promise of the Father.
9-10. In the center of this unique abiding relationship is the love of God. Christ exhorts His disciples to continue in my love . It is interesting to note that this is the first fruit of the Spirit mentioned in Galatians 5:22. Christ remained in the Father's love because He obeyed Him. We remain in Christ's love because we obey His commandments (14:21, 23-24).
11. The second fruit of the Spirit is joy. The abiding relationship also gives us Christ's joy. Christ promises them fruit, answered prayer, love, and joy as the result of abiding in Him.
12. This is the second commandment found in chapter 15. The first is abide in me (vs. 7), and now Christ commands them to love one another . He defines the extent of that love in the phrase, as I have loved you .
13-14. Love is giving sacrificially for others. Love is not an emotional feeling, but it is the act of giving (3:16). To be a friend of Christ means to obey Him.
15. Because of their obedience, Christ could now call them friends . As His friends , they were told all the things that Christ had heard from the Father .
16. Although they were Christ's friends, this was by His choice, not their choice. Ordained you (Gr- tithemi , appointed you). Bring forth fruit. It is evident that the fruit refers to love and its results (15:8-14). Note the progression. To abide means to bear fruit; to bear fruit means to experience answered prayer (he may give it you) .
17. Again Christ returns to the theme of love. Loving one another is a command, not an option.

Edward G. Dobson, D.D.

God Bless!
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by BobRyan:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />

As unbelievable as this action would be, that is how unbelievable it would be for a Christian discipple, who has been forgiven a lifetime of sin, to be unforgiving of others. In the story, such an unforgiving servant is called a wicked servant because no true believer would do such. The unforgiving servant is not the one who was saved and then lost his salvation. The story is merely hypothetical; no one forgiven a debt of millions would behave this way, therefore, the intention of the parable is to challenge the genuineness of the disciple's conversion
This is called eisegesis! It is called "standing the text on its head"!!

Notice that the POINT in the "recast" of the text above is to claim that the text is challenging the "genuine nature" of the KINGS's statement "I FORGAVE YOU".

The total "rework" that OSAS "needs" is to divert AWAY from the KING's claim that the FORGIVEN servant SHOULD forgive others and to twist it around to say "IF you were REALLY forgiven by ME then you COULD only forgive others. But SINCE you are not forgiving others THEN I MUST HAVE LIED when I said I forgave you!"

How can such a spin- such a twist and wrench of the text be "ignored" in an "all-for-osas" model? It testifies to the powerful atraction that the tradition of OSAS has had on Christians in recent times.

In Christ,

Bob </font>[/QUOTE]
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member

John 15

1 ""I am the true vine, and My Father is the vinedresser.
2 ""Every branch in Me that does not bear fruit, He takes away; and every branch that bears fruit, He prunes it so that it may bear more fruit.
3 "" You are already clean because of the word which I have spoken to you.
4 "" Abide in Me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself unless it abides in the vine, so neither can you unless you abide in Me.
5 ""I am the vine, you are the branches; he who abides in Me and I in him, he bears much fruit, for apart from Me you can do nothing.
6 ""If anyone does not abide in Me, he is thrown away as a branch and dries up; and they gather them, and cast them into the fire and they are burned.
Rom 11:
19You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.”
20Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear;
21for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either.
They were even MORE compatible with God's plan than we are today. They could only FALL from such an exalted position. In Christ – the vine (John 15) the Jews fell and this is a warning to “us”? Only if OSAS is not true.
Rom 11:
22Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, severity, but to you, God’s kindness, if you continue in His kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off.
They become a warning to US as WE are in THEIR former position.

Rom11:
23And they also, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again.
God desires to RE-establish them WITH US in that FORMER position IN the body of Christ. (Every branch In Me that does not bear fruit is cast into the fire – John 15). Yet here we see that God is able to “graft them in again” – so they can come back IF They do not Continue in unbelief.
 

Tazman

New Member
Brother, you will not properly understand much of the meat of the Word unless you first take it upon yourself to understand, through much prayer to God, the milk. It begins with understanding born-again and salvation is "not of yourselves".
"Take it upon myself", well what about "Not of myself"
laugh.gif


According to you, belief is not of myself, understanding is not of myself, faith is not of myself. I don't have to do anythging.

Yeah baby! Cheap grace, I love it. :D

Look, get it in your head that everything that exist is not of yourself and ANY oppertunity we have is an act of Gods grace, but its through OUR (YOUR) faith it will be done for you.


Here is the best teaching I have seen on John 15.
Why don't you say it more clearly like this:

"This is all I WANT to see in John 15"

Because there are obvious things that you conveniently excluded Highlighting. Sad, but true. What are you afraid of, maybe that you are wrong?

Simple: is the Master in the Parable (Mat 18) God or Not? Yes or No?

Was the "forgiveness" that the Father gave revoked? Yes or No?

John 15

Were the branches apart of the vine (vine being jesus), Yes or No?

Were THOSE Branches able to be cut off, yes or No?

Who would do the Cutting?

I don't want to paint you in a corner, because what is happening is that you are now in danger of preaching differently than what Jesus taught.

YOU ARE DENYING THE FATHER WORD

Your ONLY way to defend your Teaching is to DENY any association of Jesus' message in the above referenced scriptures to believers, and that is sin. Because the lessons were for believers.

Next you are going to tell me that Jesus was talking to none believers when he threaten the following:

Rev 3:2 "Wake up! Strengthen what remains and is about to die, for I have not found your deeds complete in the sight of my God. Remember, therefore, what you have received and heard; obey it, and repent. But if you do not wake up, I will come like a thief, and you will not know at what time I will come to you.
Yet you have a few people in Sardis who have not soiled their clothes . They will walk with me, dressed in white, for they are WORTHY. He who overcomes will, like them, be dressed in white. I will never blot out his name from the book of life, but will acknowledge his name before my Father and his angels.


It should be obvious that ONLY those who remain faithful (keep clean) will NEVER BE BLOTTED OUT by Jesus.

See right there! There is eternal security for those who stay faithful (Or clean).
flower.gif
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by Tazman:

Simple: is the Master in the Parable (Mat 18) God or Not? Yes or No?

Was the "forgiveness" that the Father gave revoked? Yes or No?
John Wesley on Matt 18

34. His Lord delivered him to the tormentors - Imprisonment is a
much severer punishment in the eastern countries than in ours.
State criminals, especially when condemned to it, are not only
confined to a very mean and scanty allowance, but are frequently
loaded with clogs or heavy yokes, so that they can neither lie nor
sit at ease: and by frequent scourgings and sometimes rackings are
brought to an untimely end. Till he should pay all that was due to
him - That is, without all hope of release, for this he could never
do. How observable is this whole account; as well as the great
inference our Lord draws from it:

1. The debtor was freely and fully forgiven;

2. He wilfully and grievously offended;

3. His pardon was retracted, the whole debt required, and the
offender delivered to the tormentors for ever. And shall we still
say, but when we are once freely and fully forgiven, our pardon
can never be retracted? Verily, verily, I say unto you, So likewise
will my heavenly Father do to you, if ye from your hearts forgive
not every one his brother their trespasses.

http://eword.gospelcom.net/comments/matthew/wesley/matthew18.htm
Coffman’s commentary also deals with the text without reservation. He makes no attempt to “spin the text back” to protect a preconceived notion.


Coffman on Matt 18 -

The great problem in the parable is in the fact that after the unmerciful servant was forgiven, he yet landed in the hands of the tormentors until he should pay it all. The wise words of Richard Trench give the true explanation:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Richard Trench
Nor may we leave out of sight that all forgiveness, short of that crowning and last act, which will find place on the day of judgment, and will be followed by a blessed impossibility of sinning any more, is conditional - in the very nature of things so conditional, that the condition in every case must be assumed, whether stated or no; that condition being that the forgiven man continues in faith and obedience ... which this unmerciful servant had failed to do. F10
Burton Coffman –
http://www.studylight.org/com/bcc/view.cgi?book=mt&chapter=018

</font>[/QUOTE]
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Notice that "even" in the case of the reference link trying to preserve OSAS the obvious point that this is God forgiving sin - could not be glossed over.


Writer below "sees the clear" statements and simply "hopes" that the warning is "impossible and purely hypothetical". Since the issues are so clear and can not be avoided - he tries to recast it as "Well this is like saying if you don't forgive others the Easter Bunny will GET you!" - his idea is that the entire thing is impossible!!

He states that what Christ "should" have said is "IF you do not forgive others you were never forgiven by the King in the first place". A point entirely MISSING from the text!!

The Parable of the Unforgiving Servant Matt 18 (vss. 23-25) was used by Jesus to reinforce the power and importance of the principle of forgiveness.

A certain king represents God, the sovereign Father (cf. vs. 35), to whom the debt is owed. The one who owed him is a servant or satrap who had access to the kings money, and represents the individual sinner.

Ten thousand talents was an insurmountable debt equivalent to millions of dollars in our society. It represents the debt of sin which the sinner cannot possibly pay by himself. The command that he be sold...and payment to be made indicates his being placed in a debtor's prison. However, an entire lifetime of service could never repay such a debt. The interpreter must stick to the main point of the parable and not be sidetracked by its minor details. The compassion of the king releases him and forgives (cancels) the debt .

The picture illustrates God's total forgiveness when dealing with our sins at the point of salvation. The debt has been paid by Christ and we are set free from it forever!

...
by - Edward E. Hindson, Th.D., D.Min. B.A., William Tyndale Colledge; M.A., Trinity Evangelical Divinity School; Th.M., Grace Theological Seminary; Th.D., Trinity Graduate School of Theology; D.Min., Westminister Theological Seminary; D.Litt. (Hon.), California Graduate school of Theology.

Posted on the internet at –
http://www.baptistboard.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/28/3579/8.html#000114
The Good news

The author admits to “obvious” points that some other apologists for OSAS would hesitate to admit for fear of dumping the tradition of OSAS.

#1. This is a parable showing the process of salvation.
#2. The debt owed is the debt of sin
#3. The grace and the forgiveness here is real Gospel forgiveness.
#4. The turning over to the tormentors is not purgatory and then heaven – it is the real payment for sin. The real deal. The second death owed by the lost.
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
And to think that Steaver was the first to point out this author's statements on the obvious facts in MAtt 18!

God is good.

In Christ,

Bob
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Man, I miss Steaver.

He hasn't touch this thread in a while... I guess he's too busy with his own thread.
Sorry brothers, I will make this thread my first objective when I return. I have overlooked it as of late.

God Bless!
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Why don't you say it more clearly like this:

"This is all I WANT to see in John 15"

Because there are obvious things that you conveniently excluded Highlighting. Sad, but true. What are you afraid of, maybe that you are wrong?
I posted the comentary exactly the way the author had written it. Any Highlighting was by the publisher and it was only to show the reader what phrase or word was taken directly from the bible and was being addressed.

Simple: is the Master in the Parable (Mat 18) God or Not? Yes or No?
Yes, God the Father.

Was the "forgiveness" that the Father gave revoked? Yes or No?
It does not say. I would say no. The servant was punished for not forgiving another servant.

Were the branches apart of the vine (vine being jesus), Yes or No?
Yes.

Were THOSE Branches able to be cut off, yes or No?
Yes.

Who would do the Cutting?
God the Father.

I don't want to paint you in a corner, because what is happening is that you are now in danger of preaching differently than what Jesus taught.
You are running out of paint brother, I am going to get away!
wave.gif


YOU ARE DENYING THE FATHER WORD
So says you brother.

Your ONLY way to defend your Teaching is to DENY any association of Jesus' message in the above referenced scriptures to believers, and that is sin. Because the lessons were for believers.
Did I say that they were not lessons for believers?

"All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works". (2Ti 3:16-17)

Next you are going to tell me that Jesus was talking to none believers when he threaten the following:

Rev 3:2 "Wake up! Strengthen what remains and is about to die, for I have not found your deeds complete in the sight of my God. Remember, therefore, what you have received and heard; obey it, and repent. But if you do not wake up, I will come like a thief, and you will not know at what time I will come to you.
Yet you have a few people in Sardis who have not soiled their clothes . They will walk with me, dressed in white, for they are WORTHY. He who overcomes will, like them, be dressed in white. I will never blot out his name from the book of life, but will acknowledge his name before my Father and his angels.
So you believe Jesus threatens His children into submission? Either you love Him or you don't. I will have to take some time to take another look into this passage if you like. I haven't read one yet that debunks OSAS.

It should be obvious that ONLY those who remain faithful (keep clean) will NEVER BE BLOTTED OUT by Jesus.

See right there! There is eternal security for those who stay faithful (Or clean).
So you are sinless (Or clean)?

Hope I covered everything on the table for you.

God Bless!
 

Tazman

New Member
Steaver thanks for replying

I posted the comentary exactly the way the author had written it. Any Highlighting was by the publisher and it was only to show the reader what phrase or word was taken directly from the bible and was being addressed.
But did you personally pick out Jesus' condition of relationship. Staying connected to Him?


Was the "forgiveness" that the Father gave revoked? Yes or No?

Steaver said:
It does not say. I would say no. The servant was punished for not forgiving another servant.
The servants punishment obviously could not pay back the debt that he now owe that he didn't owe before. So, didn't Jesus say that the Father will treat us (saved people - remember he's talking to his disciples) the same way if we don't forgive others? Yes or No?

God DOES have the Power to revoke our sins based on the terms he set, correct? Yes or No.


You are running out of paint brother, I am going to get away!
Actually I got one more can left. Hold the ladder for me
laugh.gif


So you believe Jesus threatens His children into submission? Either you love Him or you don't. I will have to take some time to take another look into this passage if you like. I haven't read one yet that debunks OSAS.
Admonish would be my preferred wording, but sure. God's love shouldn't be questioned by us as if WE know the true definition of Love. We are not the Standard, He is!

Yep, look into the passage, but DON'T read into it. Read out of it. Don't rewrite it. Let it be!
When reading ask some question you would not normally ask. Try it. It could be helpful.

1. Who is he specifically addressing? (Don't say "unsaved" people. I trust that you will give the Son his rights to truth in His own Statements, even if you don't agree with Him.)
2. Why?
3. Can he blot out sins and would He?
4. How are people "worthy" of him?

So far we can conclude that the father and give and take back. Not that he will but that he can.

The above passage should help you to also see that He will if there is not repentance.
thumbs.gif



So you are sinless (Or clean)?
Yep! :D
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But did you personally pick out Jesus' condition of relationship. Staying connected to Him?
The difference is understanding what part of the relationship Jesus is speaking of. It is not salvation, that is settled upon re-birth. The part that is in view is fruits. Ye can do nothing "good" outside of remaining in fellowship with your Savior Jesus Christ. Working on your own does not send a believer to hell. In fact ALL of your works could be burned up in that fire yet you yourself would be saved(1Cor 3:15). Let scripture interpret scripture.

The servants punishment obviously could not pay back the debt that he now owe that he didn't owe before. So, didn't Jesus say that the Father will treat us (saved people - remember he's talking to his disciples) the same way if we don't forgive others? Yes or No?
It is only "obvious" to you because you want to believe that way. Let scripture interpret scripture. Last part answer to your question is "yes".

God DOES have the Power to revoke our sins based on the terms he set, correct? Yes or No.
God can do anything He pleases, but scripture reveals that He chooses NOT to go against His Word. There are many things God WILL NOT do. Revoking salvation is one of them. For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.

Yep, look into the passage, but DON'T read into it. Read out of it. Don't rewrite it. Let it be!
When reading ask some question you would not normally ask. Try it. It could be helpful.
What is truly helpful is going to God in prayer and asking Him to teach you as you use the tools He has provided like commentaries. And always let scripture interpret scripture rather than trying to extract a doctrine out of a single passage.

1. Who is he specifically addressing? (Don't say "unsaved" people. I trust that you will give the Son his rights to truth in His own Statements, even if you don't agree with Him.)
2. Why?
3. Can he blot out sins and would He?
4. How are people "worthy" of him?
These questions are irrelevent unless you use scripture to answer them rather than trying to self-interpret the passage.

quote:Steaver asked,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are sinless (Or clean)?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Taz says,

Yep!
I'm not, that is why I need the blood of the Lamb each day.

God Bless!
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Taz asked...

1. Why would God refer to an unbeliever as a servant in a parable? The world is condemned already according to Jesus in John 3:17-20.

2. It is clear as it has always been, that Jesus is speaking to His students as Servants of His Father and this lesson served as a warning for them. It was Peter who initiated the conversation that Jesus responded to.
Taz posted...

Your bleif is not based on Jesus' teachings, but only on your theology. If you did accept Jesus' teachings you would be able to admit:

1. The parable of Mat 18 was given to believers about believers

2. The Master is Obviously GOD

3. The servants Obviously the Disciples

4. Foregiveness was revoked
Hi brother,

You are declaring that the man in the parable is a believer because he is called a servant. So let's break this down from the top.

vs 23. " Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened unto a certain king, which would take account of his servants ".

Bob as well declares that the "kingdom of heaven" is speaking of believers. So here we have a king(God the Father) taking account of His servants(the saved).

vs 24. " And when he had begun to reckon, one was brought unto him, which owed him ten thousand talents ".

One of God's servants(saved, believer) was brought unto him, which owed him ten thousand talents(represents the servant/believers debt of sin he could not pay).

vs 25. " But forasmuch as he had not to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife, and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made ".

The servant(believer) was ordered to pay for his sins.

vs 26. " The servant therefore fell down, and worshipped him, saying, Lord, have patience with me, and I will pay thee all ".

The servant(the saved man) begged for patience to repay a debt he could not pay.

vs 27. " Then the lord of that servant was moved with compassion, and loosed him, and forgave him the debt ".

The God of that servant(believer) had mercy and forgave him all his sin debt. This now made the servant(believer, saved man, child of God) a believer, saved man, child of God. :confused:

Why is the servant starting out in the parable getting saved again? Can people become born-again over and over? Please explain.

God Bless!
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Christ's parable is "accurate" in that it shows the servant "owes" and it shows the King declaring the servant "truly forgiven".

In the Parable the point is made that the servant should CHOOSE to respond in kind - showing forgiveness JUST AS he has REALLY been forgiven.

This point is beyond obfuscating. It is clear to all. I have shown bible scholars of other denominations admitting to these obvious points as even the link on page one admits to it!!

It is too late to go back and try to "recast" the points ALREADY firmly established!

The King is God. The servant are those who owe their service to God. the servant that OWES the great debt is EVERY lost human - every lost child of God.

These points are too obvious to be diverted!

They must simply be accepted.

The entire parable is based on the idea of free will - of being able to CHOOSE of being motivated by "gratitude" of showing forgiveness "in kind" JUST as one has BEEN truly forgiven.

NEVER does the parable allow the reader to suppose that the king is a Liar when He says "I FORGAVE YOU".

The point is obvious.

In Christ,

Bob
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes Bob, you have said many times. Now does being called a servant mean that person is saved? You overlooked my reason for the post to Taz, I guess.

God Bless!
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
I stated repeatedly that the servant is in the same position as the lost child of God -

Bob said -
The servant are those who owe their service to God. the servant that OWES the great debt is EVERY lost human - every lost child of God.
I point out that the "forgiven" servant is the saved child of God -

News flash - there is no such thing as an unforgiven saint.

So when Christ says "Other sheep I have that are not of this fold" he points to the lost sheep that the shepherd seeks.

In the story forgiveness is what is offerred in the "Gospel of the Kingdom" that Christ preached.

There is NO other source of forgiveness from God!

One Gospel - not two.

In Christ,

Bob
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
...
These points are too obvious to be diverted!

They must simply be accepted.

The entire parable is based on the idea of free will - of being able to CHOOSE of being motivated by "gratitude" of showing forgiveness "in kind" JUST as one has BEEN truly forgiven.

NEVER does the parable allow the reader to suppose that the king is a Liar when He says "I FORGAVE YOU".

The point is obvious.
 
Top