Ha ha ha
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Ha ha ha
Then you gots allota political hacks walking around... and ready to kneecap ya! It’s enough to make a judge cryShe is a liar like the rest of them. I only wonder how much Soros is paying her. She cannot remember when or where it happened but she can remember who. Sorry don't buy it. Further, there is not enough evidence to support issuing a warrant of any kind much less and indictment. The Dems say he has not right to be assumed innocent until proven guilty. With the lack of any evidence at all anyone who believes her is a political hack.
That's not a man who should be on the Supreme Court
They look pretty pleased before & during, I’d say. Not appropriate behavior, but it’s who they are.I haven't heard any Democrats saying anything like that. Do you have a video?
I did hear Trump say what you claim in his recent press conference, where he called Democratic concerns about Kavanaugh to be a "big fat con job" and that they go off behind closed doors and "laugh like hell."
That's the Trump obsession that he tries to push onto his supporters.
I didn't let anything slip. I realized that I personally don't need to know whether or not Ford's allegations are true. That post was the place where I actually fully formed my opinion and came to a conclusion.Whoa, there it is. Just like the Dems, you made up your mind without any further investigation even though you presented yourself here as being fair and just wanting to know all the facts first. You let it slip brother.
Why is it not appropriate for people to greet each other warmly and have conversations? I'm quite sure you will see Republicans doing the same thing before and after the hearing if you go back and look at the video.They look pretty pleased before & during, I’d say. Not appropriate behavior, but it’s who they are.
Because this is a background investigation, not a criminal investigation.One might wonder why these three self declared victims get a special FBI investigation instead of going back to the local police like any other victim has to do.
but you pointed me back to his belligerent tone, his 'massive left wing conspiracy' statement alleging his troubles were because of people disappointed in the outcome of the election as well as somehow involving the Clintons. I realized that he was not going to be able to make unbiased judgments if he sat on the Supreme Court.
I realized that he was not going to be able to make unbiased judgments if he sat on the Supreme Court.
His attack and evasion regarding a question about whether or not he might have had memory lapses while drinking heavily makes me think he was lying,
I also have a high school yearbook with lots of coded references to drug usage and drinking (1982),
Because this is a background investigation, not a criminal investigation.
Yes. But we are well past the statute of limitations.Enough already with this nonsense. The man has been accused of CRIMES.
I don't know about the "loonies", but sane, reasonable, thoughtful, honest, and intelligent people also want the incident investigated.CRIMES are what the loonies want investigated.
Fundamentally, what is being investigated is whether or not a person nominated to serve on the Supreme Court is being honest about his past. If he is lying under oath, he should not serve and is in peril of prosecution, as are all of the persons who are testifying.CRIMES are what the FBI is looking into.
Obviously, that is a matter of opinion.I don't think he was belligerent. I would be quite perturbed if ten partisan lefties determined to portray me as a rapist for political purposes slandered me one after another and caused half the country's left wing nut jobs to harass my wife and children. "Belligerent"? I think not. Righteous anger is what I seen.
No, I took seriously what you have previously written and I started considering his testimony aside from the actual allegations against him. I simply do not find many of his answers credible.He has an impeccable lengthy record which ALL of his peers, both democrat and republican, agree. You are buying into what those few nuts in the committee are saying. More slander. Don't let them deceive you brother.
Are you certain of that? Blacking out my feel subjectively similar to "falling asleep."I was a foolish drunkard in my youth. I can relate to his experience with drunkenness. I never blacked out drunk. I did fall asleep, but I never had an experience when I did not remember what i had done.
I know a classmate who does not remember her junior year of high school, except for a few fleeting memories here and there. She has a severe alcohol and drug problem. She ended up coming to faith and working through her addictions, but the memories never came back. Most of her knowledge of that year comes from what others have told her and the high school yearbook, since she was a cheerleader. In every photo, she is glassy-eyed.In fact, I call bs on people who claim they were too drunk to remember what they had done while drunk. It is an excuse, a lie, trying to blame the alcohol rather than taking responsibility for their actions.
It is relevant because of what is alleged. It is evidence that things are not quite the way he claims.Can you believe this?! Forget about his 35 year record of pristine service as a clerk and judge. Let's see what goofy things he wrote in his year book when he was sixteen. Seriously, that is sad.
How many times have the Clintons been investigated?This will be the seventh time he has been investigated.
Indeed.If anyone has the time, this is a pretty good read inspired by these hearings from a respected author & professor:
Epitaph for a Dying Culture
I simply do not find many of his answers credible.
Six Hour Warning
Thie thread will be closed sometime after 4 PM Pacific.