• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

MEDIA BLACKOUT: Obama Forged IDs & Eligibility "Heard in Conference" ...TODAY

carpro

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
http://redflagnews.com/headlines/ju...es-to-hold-conference-on-eligibility-of-obama

MEDIA BLACKOUT: Obama Forged IDs & Eligibility "Heard in Conference" Before the Full Supreme Court... T O D A Y !

Chief Justice John Roberts Schedules A Case Regarding Obamas Forged IDs to be Heard in Conference Before the Full Supreme Court. Date: FEBRUARY 19, 2013.

The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.
 
J

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Even if true, there will be no serious action taken to rectify the matter; the liberals have their heads in the sand too deep to see truth, or care, and the R's don't have the guts/desire to rock the boat based on truth alone.
IOW, as a nation we have been shafted.
 
carpro

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
just-want-peace said:
Even if true, there will be no serious action taken to rectify the matter;
Click to expand...

True. It's a potato too hot too handle. SCOTUS will find a reason to scuttle the case, even if it is rock solid.

The real news is that SCOTUS is even talking about it...and the media isn't.
 
carpro

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Connected with this case, Supreme court clerks are being publicly accused of withholding evidence and briefs from the justices, and basically deciding on their own which cases should be heard.

If even half of this stuff turns out to be true, it will rock the foundation of a nation.
 
R

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
carpro said:
http://redflagnews.com/headlines/ju...es-to-hold-conference-on-eligibility-of-obama

MEDIA BLACKOUT: Obama Forged IDs & Eligibility "Heard in Conference" Before the Full Supreme Court... T O D A Y !

Chief Justice John Roberts Schedules A Case Regarding Obamas Forged IDs to be Heard in Conference Before the Full Supreme Court. Date: FEBRUARY 19, 2013.

The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.
Click to expand...

You troll :laugh:
 
Jedi Knight

Jedi Knight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
carpro said:
Connected with this case, Supreme court clerks are being publicly accused of withholding evidence and briefs from the justices, and basically deciding on their own which cases should be heard.

If even half of this stuff turns out to be true, it will rock the foundation of a nation.
Click to expand...

As deceitful and dishonest as the President has been...nothing would surprise me.
 
carpro

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2013/0...-legal-documents-from-supreme-court-justices/

Press Release: Employees Of The Supreme Court Of The United States Caught With-Holding Legal Documents From Supreme Court Justices!

Dear Mr.(Congressman) Goodlatte,

On 12.11. 2013 Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.

On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual justices, library of Congress and National Archives.

Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5 justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of the original box in which 5 copies were sent back, as well as the photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as evidence.

Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted to the clerks’ office a supplemental briefwith information crucial to the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James Baldin. She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.

The clerks’ office never docketed the Supplemental Brief (Exhibit 2 Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top