Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
... been there and seen that.No, we had open communion
since I was not the pastor - I took it no further
I dont know if the pastor ever followed up.
And the child - actually, he was a brat anyways.
Benjamin Keach (prominent Particular Baptist of the 1600s):
"God hath in our days wrought by his Spirit, savingly on several little Children, some three or four years old, others about six or seven"
p. 16, “A Counter-Antidote…Wherein the Baptism of Believers Is Evinced to Be God’s Ordinance” by Benjamin Keach (London, 1694)
It seems that dad was there - but this happened a good 20 years ago - so all details are a bit fuzzy - but I will never forget how mom came up front to......That the Father was not present to lead, speaks volumes: -
It would be interesting to see if Benjamin Keach was really prepared to accept what he claimed. If a 4-year old (or 8-year old) really shows evidence of "salvation", then the church has no reason to withold baptism, membership ... and all that comes with membership. Are they prepared to allow the 8-year old to vote on church matters or hold any office that any other unmarried man might hold? If not, then on what BIBLICAL basis?I actually find that hard to believe. Just mouthing the words does not mean you understand what you are saying.
But even then the exception does not make the rule.
Yes, he declared: "little Children who do believe in Christ, have an indubitable right to Baptism".It would be interesting to see if Benjamin Keach was really prepared to accept what he claimed. If a 4-year old...shows evidence of "salvation", then the church has no reason to withold baptism
Reproof to y'all from no less than Charles Spurgeon:
https://www.spurgeongems.org/vols7-9/chs381.pdf
“We do not contend for the baptism of adults; we contend for the baptism of believers. Show us a child however young, who believes in Christ, and we gladly accept him”
I do not doubt that he would "baptize" children, and I know of several contemporary churches that baptize pre-teens who make a confession of faith. My question is this: in most churches, being baptized and attending the church is the criteria for "membership" and all "members" are entitled to vote on the budget, approve the new pastor and participate in other matters of "church business" ... so do you grant a baptized "child" the same rights as any other church member? Does the 8-year old ask questions on the new budget or vote on approving a missionary to be supported by the church?Yes, he declared: "little Children who do believe in Christ, have an indubitable right to Baptism".
Hmm...what do you think of the voting of Fundamentalists' young children as messengers being one of the tactics used in the Takeover of the Convention in the 1980s?We have a Junior membership list - must be 18 to vote (male or female)
Kinda echoes Jesus' words.Reproof to y'all from no less than Charles Spurgeon:
https://www.spurgeongems.org/vols7-9/chs381.pdf
“We do not contend for the baptism of adults; we contend for the baptism of believers. Show us a child however young, who believes in Christ, and we gladly accept him”
I totally disagree with that action. Should be 18 to vote.Hmm...what do you think of the voting of Fundamentalists' young children as messengers being one of the tactics used in the Takeover of the Convention in the 1980s?
The parent is responsible for the child’s behavior and their own. If they were just looking for a snack, the chapter is clear that that is not snack time. I was taught that when I was little.I was serving communion one day. A lady took her cup and bread - then her child - about age 4 - wanted to take some. I raised the plate so he could not get it. After I went back up front - mom came up and got some for her son. - I was flabbergasted.
Thoughts?