Been a Baptist long?
Acts 14:23
If the congregation has a say in the appointment of elders, it has a say in the acceptance of members.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Met with the deacons and became a member
- Thread starter evangelist6589
- Start date
If the congregation has a say in the appointment of elders, it has a say in the acceptance of members.
Doesn't matter what you call it. It's still a vote.
No it isn't. It is a veiled attempt at getting the members to agree to a foregone conclusion regarding acceptance for membership. A vote is a straight head count with a yes or no/ majority rules outcome. In other words, "Slight of Hand."
salzer mtn
Well-Known Member
It would seem by some of these post it doesn't matter what anyone decides to do they always say God is directing me to do this or God told me to do that. I do not believe God will direct someone to join a church or pastor a church that you are in disagreement with on doctrine. There is just to much difference in sovereign grace and free will that they will not walk together. How can two walk together accept they agree. Evan I don't think you rightly understand Gods Free grace to sinners, you may understand the doctrine of election and predestination but a sovereign grace preacher preaches Christ the person is sinners salvation. The church you joined will preach to you each Sunday giving you illustration on how good a Christian should be and the pastor will usually use himself as the pattern. So everyone will go out of the door at the end of the service feeling super good about themselves thinking God can't do without them.
thisnumbersdisconnected
New Member
21 years. Never saw this done in any of the four churches of which I've been a member.
No. Not even. Can't be remotely implied from the Acts verse. Church isn't a club. Voting on accepting a member makes it a club.
Nope. We're not voting on anything. We're committing to them as brothers and sisters in Christ.
Greektim
Well-Known Member
I've never taken the context to refer to congregations but to Paul and co. They were the ones appointing elders.
Oh I am aware and disagree with them in several areas including altar calls, free will etc. however I found a solution.
1. I have my books and Podcasts from Reformed to educate me.
2. ESSENTIALS UNITY, secondary things liberty, and in all things charity!
They affirm the essentials of the faith good enough!
What are your thoughts on the comments of John Gill and John Calvin on that passage?
No it doesn't. And, yes, the ordination of elders in Acts 14:23 was a vote signified by an outstretched hand.
You can call a dog's tail a leg all you want. It's still a tail.
Last edited by a moderator:
OK..... do you feel doctrine is a secondary issue?
and isnt there any REFORMED Churches in Denver.....like OPC, PCA, Reformed Baptist etc.
Last edited by a moderator:
Did I say that? No I simply said that SECONDARY issues do not warrant division. That means do not divide over a view on eschatology, music, bible translations, etc.. There are exceptions of coarse... Yes there are Reformed churches but as I have said many times I am locked where I am and have decided to make the best of where I am.
Why you forget this is beyond me. But then again maybe you are getting back at me for me talking of Rev Brother Paul Washer.
I simply asked you a few questions.....its you that is both paranoid & defensive.
I missed this. I see what you're saying. Yeah, who's gonna object on Sunday morning in front of everybod? (Who except someone like me, that is.) Membership should be voted on in a business meeting, and it was in a church I attended.
Then ate you involved to the point of interviewing the guy or gal? also what do you look for in a person & what wouldnt you accept?
thisnumbersdisconnected
New Member
We disagree.
For elders. No way it can be made to fit acceptance of one's fitness as a mere member.
No kidding. I also doubt that members had a formal application to join these early churches, or were even referred to as members. A profession of faith and baptism is probably all one needed to do to become a "member".
Duh.
You asked for a biblical foundation. Athority rests in the body, not in the presbytery. Elders do not rule without consent of the body, and none join to a body without that consent.
Last edited by a moderator:
Who's talking about applications?
Your bylaws don't state the conditions of membership, or describe what it means to be a member in good standing?
thisnumbersdisconnected
New Member
Exactly. That is the current church model, as well. Faith and Baptism. Anything else is something man made up.