Michael Flynn Willing to Testify in Exchange for Immunity

[InTheLight]

WASHINGTON – Mike Flynn, President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, has told the Federal Bureau of Investigation and congressional officials investigating the Trump campaign’s potential ties to Russia that he is willing to be interviewed in exchange for a grant of immunity from prosecution, according to officials with knowledge of the matter.

Flynn offers to testify in Trump-Russia probe in exchange for immunity

Hmmm... Usually people that ask for immunity are guilty of something and they've got tons of dirt on others. Should be interesting.

Sent from my Moto Droid Turbo.

 

[carpro]

"He has made the offer to the FBI and the House and Senate intelligence committees though his lawyer but has so far found no takers, the officials said."

What he has to offer is apparently not enough to advance a case for prosecution against anyone. HMMM...

 

[InTheLight]

Mysterio speaks again.

Isn't it also possible that he has no takers because:

1. The investigators have sufficient evidence that they don't need his testimony.

2. They've got him nailed to the wall and don't want to let him of the hook.

Sent from my Moto Droid Turbo.

 

[carpro]

Mysterio speaks again.

Isn't it also possible that he has no takers because:

1. The investigators have sufficient evidence that they don't need his testimony.

2. They've got him nailed to the wall and don't want to let him of the hook.

Sent from my Moto Droid Turbo.

That didn't stop the FBI from granting immunity to every single guilty witness that could possibly testify against Hillary...who then promptly took the 5th.

But you're not being fair. I only posited one theory. You posited two. Your Mysterio powers double mine.

I also remember you saying Trump didn't have a chance to win the primary, let alone the election. You're going to ruin your reputation if you don't stop predicting outcomes. Leave it all to me. I enjoy it. Sometimes I even get it right.

 

[Brent W]

What he has to offer is apparently not enough to advance a case for prosecution against anyone. HMMM...

This is what happens when you play party politics. Your bias always seems to get in the way somehow

Michael Flynn's comments about immunity last year are coming back to bite him

"When you are given immunity, that means you have probably committed a crime," Flynn said during an interview with MSNBC commentator Chuck Todd.

 

[carpro]

This is what happens when you play party politics. Your bias always seems to get in the way somehow

As does yours.

 

[Brent W]

As does yours.

You can keep repeating that i have a bias over and over again but I don't think you understand what that means. Here you go, as a refresher:

prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair.

I have no preference between left or right, Trump or Clinton. If Trump was more inline with my political views I would be happy to support him but he isn't. I do my best not to put myself in a position where I dislike someone solely based on their political affiliation.

Flynn's clear bias against the Democratic party and Hilary Clinton has lead him to a foot in mouth moment. Your clear bias will not allow you to hold your Republican party to the same standards that you want to hold the Democratic party to. This is why, instead of confronting the very real issue that Trump and his administration has, you either deflect to another subject or point out where the other side has done equally bad, as if two rights = a wrong. Unfortunately this is the standard for so called debate in America these days.

 

[carpro]

Flynn's clear bias against the Democratic party and Hilary Clinton has lead him to a foot in mouth moment..

And you have zero proof that his previous statements have anything to do with not having any takers for his immunity request. Your bias must have temporarily blinded you to assume it did. At least, I hope it was temporary.

BTW. I'm not a republican. Your bias gotcha again.

 

[Brent W]

And you have zero proof that his previous statements have anything to do with not having any takers for his immunity request. Your bias must have temporarily blinded you to assume it did. At least, I hope it was temporary.

BTW. I'm not a republican. Your bias gotcha again.

Whether anyone wants to hear him or not is up to the investigation. If they end up not wanting his testimony then that definitely looks good for Trump and your political party. It does not look good at all for him to contradict himself in such a way as this though and makes people wonder what someone like him was doing in a position like he was.

 

[carpro]

Whether anyone wants to hear him or not is up to the investigation. If they end up not wanting his testimony then that definitely looks good for Trump and your political party. It does not look good at all for him to contradict himself in such a way as this though and makes people wonder what someone like him was doing in a position like he was.

Still doesn't tell us why no takers. Speculation is allowed. And I seriously doubt the committees, the DOJ or the FBI care about his previous comment. Looks kinda like a strawman on your part. that's what bias does to you.

 

[Brent W]

Still doesn't tell us why no takers. Speculation is allowed. And I seriously doubt the committees, the DOJ or the FBI care about his previous comment. Looks kinda like a strawman on your part. that's what bias does to you.

I never said they cared about his comment. It just looks bad overall to the general public and to anyone that trusted him at such a high ranking position in the administration.

Again, you don't understand, refuse to accept I'm not or just wish to play games with calling me biased. Enjoy the rest of your night and I wish you and your party best of luck during this investigation.