Mid Acts Dispensationalists

[evangelist6589]

I would at least recommend Erickson's Book, Basic Guide to Eschatology, A: Making Sense of the Millennium.

He is a Pre-mill Dispy (I think), but seems to fairly discuss and evaluate the other views. This book looks at 4 different views, I think.

Thats a good book and I have read it. I disagree with his tribulation views, but regardless a great book.

 

[AresMan]

As Hank Hanegraaf says often (yes I disagree wit his views in this area) we can argue and argue over this issue, but we do not need to divide over it. Eschatology is a big field of which there are thousands of books and web sites. I myself have several books, with 2 more coming in the mail. I was thinking about getting a good Walvoord book or Pentecost, but its okay as my mind may explode due to overload.

Modern mid-Acts dispensationalism makes Walvoord and Pentecost look like Covenant Theologians. Mid-Acts dispensationalism goes way beyond mainstream classical, revised, or progressive dispensationalism.

When reading writings from the early church fathers to see support for mid-Acts dispensationalism, I found nothing even remotely suggesting it (let alone any form of dispensationalism). The only writings close enough were those of the "Christian" gnostics who would agree with mid-Acts dispensationalists that Paul and Peter taught separate, conflicting gospels concerning Jesus Christ.

 

[Yeshua1]

Sorry, I'm out of touch, obviously.

What is the mid-Acts view?

isn't it Hyper Dispy, that teaches and holds that basically the Church started with Apostle paul, as he was THE Apostle to gentiles, and see nothing in NT before his ministry was wriiten to us today, as that all applied to either isreal, or to transistion saints!