1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

middle ground

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by menageriekeeper, Aug 25, 2007.

  1. Lazarus

    Lazarus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ro 9:18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.
     
    #21 Lazarus, Aug 26, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 26, 2007
  2. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    Doesn't God really elect those who will come? Those that won't come aren't elected. Doesn't God know from the beginning of creation (or before) who will and who won't come to Him? Those He forsees will come to Him, He sends His Spirit to draw them.

    Sometimes I think neither side adds up. :laugh:

    I think I'll just thank God that He called me and I responded, regardless if I can explain it or not. :)
     
  3. npetreley

    npetreley New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    2
    Exactly. In the free-will "fairness" scenario, God is obligated to "offer" salvation to everyone. But if God is under such obligation, the so-called "gift" is no longer a gift, and grace is no longer grace. As you quoted later, He will have mercy on whom He has mercy. That's all there is to it.
     
  4. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have an actual life. Unfortunately it has recently involved a herniated disk in my back that has me flat on my back and unable to do much. Plus my renewed dedication to worthwhile acccomplishment at my current stage of life and ministry has caused me to cut back on the amount of time I spend here.

    So where is the middle ground between God unconditionally chooses individuals to salvation and God doesn't unconditionally choose individuals to salvation?

    That's incoherent. To "elect" is to "choose." (Look it up.) It is not both unconditional and conditional. This is one reason why I don't spend much time in here recently. We have people who don't even know the meaning of words.

    This is pure Calvinism.
     
    #24 Pastor Larry, Aug 26, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 26, 2007
  5. npetreley

    npetreley New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    2
    No, that's not what the Bible says.

    All the Father gives Me will come to Me. It doesn't say, "may come to me if they so decide", after which I'll call them the elect/chosen. We WILL come. And we come because we have been chosen and given to Him.
     
  6. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    Hi NP,
    Maybe the Father only gives to Jesus those He forsaw (is that a word? :laugh: )would say yes?
     
  7. Lazarus

    Lazarus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    These are who God has called,

    1Co 1:26 For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:
    27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;
    28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:


    If God called me because He knew I would except, would'nt I then be able to brag about it?

    29 That no flesh should glory in his presence.


    God doesn't say anything about knowing who will except. God calls according to His will.
     
    #27 Lazarus, Aug 26, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 26, 2007
  8. russell55

    russell55 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Messages:
    2,424
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think it's unconditional/conditional election.

    It comes down to the question of how God chooses (elects) those whom he will bring to salvation. Does he choose based on something within them (like his forseeing that they will come to faith), or not?

    But the five points of Arminianism don't preclude a belief in eternal security. Here's a comparision chart, and you'll see that
    and the original Remonstrants (those who developed the five points of Arminianism) left the question of whether believers are capable of falling from grace open.
    So believing in eternal security doesn't mean someone is not Arminian.
     
  9. npetreley

    npetreley New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    2
    If the bold part meant "whom He foreknew would say yes", it would have to be a different Greek word than proginosko. The Greek word there means "knew beforehand intimately". Some free willers claim, "same diff - if He knew us intimately, that also means He knew what we'd choose".

    However, this presents problems in the context. "whom He foreknew" is as opposed to "whom He did NOT foreknow". The opposite is depicted by Jesus saying, "I never knew you". In fact, that word "knew" is ginosko - the same word in "foreknew".

    But if you change it to mean "knew beforehand would say yes", then that would be as opposed to "I never knew what you would say". Obviously, it cannot be true that Jesus never knew what we'd choose.

    So it does violence to the text to try to make "foreknow" mean that.
     
  10. russell55

    russell55 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Messages:
    2,424
    Likes Received:
    0
    Everyone, on both sides agrees that God foresees who will come to him. The question is: Does God elect (or choose) them because he foresees they will come? Is their foreseen choice to come the determining factor in God's choice of them? Or is God's choice of them the determining factor in their being willing to come?

    Or to put it in a slightly different way: Did God foresee them coming because he chose to bring them to salvation, or did he choose to bring them to salvation because he foresees them coming?
     
  11. menageriekeeper

    menageriekeeper Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ya'll don't go to fast, I have supper to fix!

    I'm thinking anything that both sides agree on is middle ground!

    I highlighted in different colors for clarity.

    Red: It's a gift because it is being offered free of charge (for lack of a better expression). It can't be a gift until it is both offered and recieved. It doesn't matter if one deserves it or not, only that one has not worked for it.

    Blue: Really now, there are all sorts of reasons why one might turn down a gift they know is valuable. It might not be a wise thing to do, or even a logical thing to do, but people are stubborn and have all sorts of reasons for not doing that which they know is right and will gain them (fill in the blank).

    Purple: Umm, do we have an example in scripture of someone who was not already a believer standing in the prescence of God? We know Lucifer did and didn't repent. But let's think about humans. EVERY knee won't bow for quite a while. However this is a wild hare and gets us no closer to the info I'm looking for.

    Green: This goes back to the purple comments. EVERY knee will eventually bow. NOT every knee will accept willingly and this is where I'm having a snag. God can and will force everyone to submit to His will in the end. What makes the difference between those who accept the fact of His Godhead on judgement day and those who accept it while they live on earth?

    Lazurus' post is as far as I can get until I feed the family. I'll be back in a bit.
     
  12. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ya'll are making my brain hurt! :laugh:

    Good point MK!

    Looking forward to the responses.
     
  13. Lazarus

    Lazarus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    If I walk into a room filled with people and offer $100.00 to anyone who excepts, I guarantee there will be a stampede. At least in my circle of friends. :thumbs:

    Now to assume that God will call anyone who he foreknew would except, would mean everyone would except. Why? because He would need to regenerate everyone in order for everyone to understand what they are accepting. To assume that anyone who knew the choice, Heaven or Hell would except Hell is not being realistic. That's the value of the gift I'm talking about.

    1Co 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

    Nobody, called or not understands what is being offered until God touches that heart. Unless somehow a person would be willing to go to HELL then God choosing because of foreknowledge will not work.
     
  14. menageriekeeper

    menageriekeeper Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Cute, but it since I don't happen think Shania Twain is all that, being forced to endure spending time with someone who only looks like her, doesn't appeal to me. Find a better way to explain why God wants to force us to accept Him, when He didn't bother to force Adam to obey.

    2pe 3:9The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

    Please, let's not play dueling scriptures. I play all too well, as do others on this board. For every scripture you post that supports your view, there is a equal scripture that supports the other side. That's why there is an arguement! Instead, what can we do to figure out how these scriptures compliment each other since it is not possible that they contradict each other?

    This seems to be the heart of the argument.

    Would you? David was called "a man after God's own heart", do you find that he bragged about his own acceptance of God's grace?

    Here's another question I have:

    If it took action by man to separate us from God, why do you think it wouldn't take an action by man to reunite us with God? Lest anyone get the wrong idea of what I'm thinking, let me restate it another way:

    If it took disobedience by Adam (ie he chose to disobey) for us to experience spiritual death, why would it then not take obedience on our part (chose to obey the step God has set forth) in order to experience spiritual life.

    Spritual life meaning union with God, spritual death meaning separation from God.
     
  15. Lazarus

    Lazarus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    In the end, God will force everyone to submit. But the key word here is force. When a man is saved, he is not forced to his knees. He is brought to his knees because of sin and his need to repent. God's holiness in contrast to a man's sin is profound. If anyone says they are saved and have never experienced that gut wrenching guilt which conviction brings then they should re-examine their relationship with God.
     
  16. Lazarus

    Lazarus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    2pe 3:9The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all (who were called) should come to repentance.

    If God is unwilling that any should perish, but because many do perish, doesn't that diminish God's power. A holy and sovereign God will not have His will come to naught. So, the all can only be those who He called and not everyone in the world.
     
  17. menageriekeeper

    menageriekeeper Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    You have a different circle of friends than I do. My friends would a) wonder if they were being offered charity, b) decline because they have plenty, or c) think the person offering needed a doctor's visit! :laugh:

    Russel, thanks for the links, I'm looking at them now.
     
  18. Lazarus

    Lazarus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    In that case just keep adding 0s. Sooner or later you will reach that magic number.
     
  19. menageriekeeper

    menageriekeeper Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Look, look, look! Middle ground!!!!! We found some.

    :mad: You are NOT allowed to add words to the scripture, in this discussion, unless you can quote the context from which you derived them. In this case you have no context and the scripture does NOT contain the words "(all who were called)"

    In this case you have no context as Peter is explaining why the Lord hasn't reappeared yet. Find some context and try again.
     
  20. Lazarus

    Lazarus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    The added words were for clarity since God's Will and Power were being called into question.
     
Loading...