Mike Lindell Plans Cyber Symposium

[Roy]

Mr. Lindell claims to have packet capture evidence from each state's 2020 election, which is irrefutable, and he plans to reveal it at the planned cyber symposium which is to be announced in July.
I admire his work and enthusiasm. His business(My Pillow) has suffered greatly because of his dedication to proving that the 2020 presidential election was stolen.

Alex Jones Show Podcast

If you click on the above link and go to the second hour podcast, you can hear him talk at length about what it all means. He thinks it will result in Trump being returned to the White House. I wish I could have that kind of optimism.

 

[canadyjd]

Even if everything he says is true, the only way Trump goes back to the White House is by winning in 2024.

This election was certified at the state and federal levels. Constitutionality, Joe Biden is the duly elected president and that will not change by anything Lindell reveals..

peace to you

 

[Roy]

Even if everything he says is true, the only way Trump goes back to the White House is by winning in 2024.

This election was certified at the state and federal levels. Constitutionality, Joe Be den is the duly elected president and that will not change by anything Lindell reveals..

peace to you

Ain't it sad? Proof of a stolen election is everywhere. Challenges to claims of legitimacy are met with scoffs, rolled eyes, conspiracy theory accusations, but no proof.

 

[canadyjd]

Ain't it sad? Proof of a stolen election is everywhere. Challenges to claims of legitimacy are met with scoffs, rolled eyes, conspiracy theory accusations, but no proof.

The constitutional process for certification was followed, not only in dem controlled states but also Repub controlled states and in the US Congress.

Sad or not, it’s over.

Look for 2022 and 2024 and go to work for your party and your candidates.

peace to you

 

[Roy]

The constitutional process for certification was followed, not only in dem controlled states but also Repub controlled states and in the US Congress.

Sad or not, it’s over.

Everything about the 2020 election is in doubt, including whether or not the constitutional process for certification was followed. Conservatives respect the constitutional process, liberals only seek to get what they want, constitutional or by hook or crook. How are law abiding citizens supposed to deal with a warped system which requires conservatives to follow a strict set of rules but excuses liberal election fraud?

 

[canadyjd]

Everything about the 2020 election is in doubt, including whether or not the constitutional process for certification was followed. Conservatives respect the constitutional process, liberals only seek to get what they want, constitutional or by hook or crook. How are law abiding citizens supposed to deal with a warped system which requires conservatives to follow a strict set of rules but excuses liberal election fraud?

I understand you think there was fraud in 2020.

The constitutional process of certification was followed at the state and federal levels.

There is absolutely no doubt. Joe Bi den’s victory has been constitutionally certified. It’s over for 2020, and that won’t change.

peace to you

 

[just-want-peace]

I understand you think there was fraud in 2020.

The constitutional process of certification was followed at the state and federal levels.

There is absolutely no doubt. Joe Bi den’s victory has been constitutionally certified. It’s over for 2020, and that won’t change.

peace to you

While all this may be true, still doesn't mean there was an honest above-board election prior to the process commencing!
I have recently (after the '20 elections) decided that there may have been some similar hanky-panky for Obama to get 2 terms.
Just saying -----!!??

 

[Roy]

canadyjd said: ↑
The constitutional process of certification was followed at the state and federal levels.

There is absolutely no doubt. Joe Bi den’s victory has been constitutionally certified. It’s over for 2020, and that won’t change.
___________________________________

There is nothing constitutional about certifying overt fraud.

 

[canadyjd]

canadyjd said: ↑
The constitutional process of certification was followed at the state and federal levels.

There is absolutely no doubt. Joe Bi den’s victory has been constitutionally certified. It’s over for 2020, and that won’t change.
___________________________________

There is nothing constitutional about certifying overt fraud.

The constitutional process was followed, both at the state and federal level. Challenges were allowed before certification. Republican controlled state legislatures certified the 2020 election results.

I’m not sure what you expect Lindels effort will accomplish. The results have been certified.

If the purpose is to present evidence of fraud so that it leads to changes in election law to prevent the fraud then ok, put it all out there and let the debates begin.

If the purpose is to have Bi den thrown out and Trump sworn in to finish a second term, that is pure fantasy and is 100% impossible.

peace to you

 

[Roy]

canadyjd said: If the purpose is to present evidence of fraud so that it leads to changes in election law to prevent the fraud then ok, put it all out there and let the debates begin.
________________________________________________________

At best, it could result in some jail sentences at the local and state levels, provided that the evidence is irrefutable. I hope that Mr. Lindell is able to go through with his plan. It is a criminal act for a member of congress to look the other way and certify an election which was so overtly fraudulent, like a policeman standing look-out for a rapist plying his depraved crime. Treason could be a better word for it because they take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, at least I think they do. I had to take that oath when entering the military.

 

[canadyjd]

…. It is a criminal act for a member of congress to look the other way and certify an election which was so overtly fraudulent…...[/QUOTE]


Please cite the criminal statute to support this statement.

peace to you

 

[Roy]

…. It is a criminal act for a member of congress to look the other way and certify an election which was so overtly fraudulent…...

Please cite the criminal statute to support this statement.

peace to you[/QUOTE]

I will check on it. In the mean time, maybe you can cite a statute which justifies dereliction of duty.

 

[canadyjd]

It’s called voting them out of office so f they aren’t doing their job

peace to you

 

[percho]

Everything about the 2020 election is in doubt, including whether or not the constitutional process for certification was followed. Conservatives respect the constitutional process, liberals only seek to get what they want, constitutional or by hook or crook. How are law abiding citizens supposed to deal with a warped system which requires conservatives to follow a strict set of rules but excuses liberal election fraud?

Here is a thought.

including whether or not
the constitutional process for certification was followed

It was about to be followed, when FBI plants and others, other than Trump followers, instigated the Capitol riot and then the VP used that as an excuse to skip the constitutional process,

The Truth the Whole Truth and Nothing But the Truth.