Originally posted by Craigbythesea:
As I have already posted, there are clear and logical reasons for a man to believe in "standard OSAS," but there are no clear or logical reasons for a man to believe in millennial exclusion.
This is your opinion. However, your opinion seems very irrational to me. If there is Biblical and logical reason to believe "standard OSAS", why is there not biblical and logical reason to belive that same doctrine but
also believe in the warnigns given to us in the Bible (which is what millennial exclusionists do)? Even if you are correct in your doctrine, surely Millennial Exclusion is closer to the truth than "standard OSAS"?
Also, why does how "logical" a doctrine is determine whether or not it is from the devil? I have seen you argue that "standard OSAS" causes people to live very ungodly lives. Millennial exclusion surely cannot do this (at least to the same degree). How then can it be any more Satanic?
You say there is no logical reason to belive millennial exclusion. I totally disagree - I think there are a great many logical reasons to belive it. Do you think therefore that I do not think logically? It seems quite arrogant of you to declare that there is "no logical reason" to believe in millennial exclusion when others believe there is. How do you know your logic is right and mine isn't even working?
Those who believe in millennial exclusion do so because of Satanic influences.
I think this is a very unwise, generalised statement to make. You have not even met me - how can you be sure that I believe something because of Satanic influences??
Mat 7
1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
Mat 12
36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.
