IgnoreBoth were socialist!
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
IgnoreBoth were socialist!
No, it wasn't designed for that. Are you going to engage with it or not?Sadly, that compass does not recognized the value of a Christianized society, which can be lost in one generation.
As suspected: Dennis Prager - WikipediaSince you avoided dealing with anything mentioned in the video the answer is no. You have not proven the right are fascists and I have given clear evidence that Nazi's are on the left wing of politics.
who happens to be a solid researcher!As suspected: Dennis Prager - Wikipedia
Come back to me when you have a non-biased, non-rightist source
So if a liberal source is cited, are they also guilty of doing the same thing? Wouldn't "right wing" Christians be under obligation to keep research bias to a minimum?...who brings his rightist bias to his research
No, it wasn't designed for that. Are you going to engage with it or not?
Isn't most of current liberalialism though really far left then?Yes, for leftist sources. Liberal, middle of the road centrist stuff not so much
As suspected: Dennis Prager - Wikipedia
Come back to me when you have a non-biased, non-rightist source
Prager usually does a credible job in making sure that his research is spot on! You might quibble with his understanding of what the facts mean, but not the actual facts themselves!Prager went to Leeds. He presents a conservative Jewish viewpoint. He does not appear in the video linked above, but it is D'souza who is discussing Italian leftist socialist Gentile, who was the father of fascism.
You could say the same thing about the writer of the Gospels, as many have said that they brought in "bias" in presenting jesusa s the Messiah, but do they not show to us that one can be right and still be credible and trustworthy?...who brings his rightist bias to his research
I come out mildly libertarian and mildly leftist. Probably about right.Yeah, I always score the same in those things, as I did with this one. I stand for small government with free enterprise and low taxes and regulation of ruthless businessmen. They don't know how to classify me because I think abortion is murder and same-sex stuff is unnatural and women's restrooms are for women only, not transgenders, and men's restrooms are for men only. They rank Christianity as repressive.
Instead of left right, we should say progressive conservative and put Bible-believers in the conservative group and non-Christians with the progressives. Then it is clear that state control of productipn and atheism along with personal criminality all define Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler.
For the record, the Prager video featured Dartmouth-educated Christian Dinesh D'Souza.
Depends how you define it. Over here, liberal means centrist, neither conservative nor socialist or social democrat. Blair, despite leading an ostensibly socialist party, was a liberal by our standards or at the most a social democratIsn't most of current liberalialism though really far left then?
Liberal in USA now means definite socialist it now seems!Depends how you define it. Over here, liberal means centrist, neither conservative nor socialist or social democrat. Blair, despite leading an ostensibly socialist party, was a liberal by our standards or at the most a social democrat
Mussolini started as a socialist when he was editor of Avanti but then reject3d socialism over his support of Italy's entry into WWI, became a nationalist and then a fascist who persecuted and killed socialists, like an intolerant ex-smokerPrager went to Leeds. He presents a conservative Jewish viewpoint. He does not appear in the video linked above, but it is D'souza who is discussing Italian leftist socialist Gentile, who was the father of fascism.
Are you suggesting Prager is infallible like the Gospels?You could say the same thing about the writer of the Gospels, as many have said that they brought in "bias" in presenting jesusa s the Messiah, but do they not show to us that one can be right and still be credible and trustworthy?
Then you're wasting two definitions/terms on one stance. What do you call a centrist, then, other than a centrist?Liberal in USA now means definite socialist it now seems!
No, rather that jsuat because he is "right wing:, does not mean that we just assume that his research is bad!Are you suggesting Prager is infallible like the Gospels?