Abortion Should Be Legal In Cases Of Rape, Incest, Mother's Health
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/27/mitt-romney-abortion_n_1834888.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/27/mitt-romney-abortion_n_1834888.html
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Abortion Should Be Legal In Cases Of Rape, Incest, Mother's Health
That is a good case for switching to Obama-Biden if I ever saw one. That will teach Romney he should have been 100% life. That is a ridiculous conclusion. 99 percent is better than zero.So Judith -- who would you recommend we vote for?
That is a good case for switching to Obama-Biden if I ever saw one. That will teach Romney he should have been 100% life.
My post was to point out the ridiculous conclusion. I completely agree about your 2016 statement. November 7 is the time to start working for a conservative nominee in 2016, not during the primary season of 2016. By then it is too late. We have made this mistake for the last several election cycles. From the tone of the comments, I think most believe down deep that Obama is going to pull this out by the smallest of margins.First, I've never seen where Romney claimed to be 100% anti-abortion. I've seen many reports where democrats claimed he was 100% anti-abortion, and the response from his campaign has always included the exclusions for rape and life of the mother. The democrats push the 100% thing to get the "women's rights" vote, knowing full well it has never been Romney's position.
Second, if I were to change my vote to Obama just to show Romney that he should have been 100%, then I've changed my vote to 100% support of abortions for any reason. So I've gone from "let's stop 99% of abortions" to "let's support 100% of abortions", just because we want 1% more?
I'm with Salty on this one. But my next step is: who are we presenting (and voting) for president for 2016?
Is anyone surprised by this? He has said this several times recently.
Romney is not pro abortion. Let's try a little honesty here.
Even if Romney were pro abortion, which he is not, how does that justify a vote for Obama? Romney has said he is pro life. If he wins and it turns out to be an election ploy, he will be held accountable.
So Judith -- who would you recommend we vote for?
So we vote for no one, and thereby allow others to choose our president for us?I would suggest that the belivers stand on the prinicples of Christ which would be no abortion. That means we cannot stand with anyone who is pro abortion. Evil never fixes evil. I do not believe that any honest believer can say that the Lord is leading them to vote pro abortion. So there is no one to vote for in this election.
Speaking of losing credibility, didn't you just quote someone that said evil never fixes evil? How does voting for Obama eliminate abortion 100%?This is where the so-called "Pro Life" crowd loses all credibility. By not caring about a mother's health, they condemn women with ectopic pregnancies to die needlessly, even though the zygote will perish regardless.
This is where the so-called "Pro Life" crowd loses all credibility. By not caring about a mother's health, they condemn women with ectopic pregnancies to die needlessly, even though the zygote will perish regardless.
How does voting for Obama eliminate abortion 100%?