<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by jeronimo:
The key words here are "one time in history." The main reason I am and many others are against CCM is that it is part of the world. . . . We Christians are supposed to be separated from the world, so we should not listen to CCM.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Er . . . the last time I checked, the world didn't listen to CCM. Most of the criticism I have heard from my non-Christian friends is either that the music is too propagandistic (i.e. it's blatantly Christian, and often evangelistic, in its subject matter), or it's inferior.
If the world listened to CCM, it would be as easy to pick up a Supertones album at the local record store as a Tool album. But the truth is that most CCM is marketed by Christians, for Christians, and at Christians. It's not just separated, it's ghettoized.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
People who do so are denying God's Word. They don't obey the Bible when saying "Be not conformed to this world..." When hymns were being considered bad music, it was part of the world. Today it is not, so it isn't bad not to listen to it.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
So whether or not something is "worldly" has to do with how old it is?
Does this mean that if I should go back to school, I could live the life of a bohemian and a libertine because there aren't any more bohemians, and therefore they're not part of the world any more? Or that I could grow my hair long, wear beads and tie-died shirts, tune in, turn on and drop out because the hippie culture is no longer part of the world?
The thing I don't get is this: no anti-CCM advocates ever have any trouble expressing their views in English, despite the fact that:
<UL TYPE=SQUARE><LI>English was invented by pagans.
<LI>The world speaks English. Christians are called out of the world, so we should not use the world's language.
<LI>English has been used to produce works of ungodly philosophy and vile pornography. How can such a filthy language possibly be used of God? We most certainly should never translate the Bible into English; an English Bible is a contradiction, just like a pornographic Bible or a drug-use Bible.
[/list]
The key words here are "one time in history." The main reason I am and many others are against CCM is that it is part of the world. . . . We Christians are supposed to be separated from the world, so we should not listen to CCM.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Er . . . the last time I checked, the world didn't listen to CCM. Most of the criticism I have heard from my non-Christian friends is either that the music is too propagandistic (i.e. it's blatantly Christian, and often evangelistic, in its subject matter), or it's inferior.
If the world listened to CCM, it would be as easy to pick up a Supertones album at the local record store as a Tool album. But the truth is that most CCM is marketed by Christians, for Christians, and at Christians. It's not just separated, it's ghettoized.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>
People who do so are denying God's Word. They don't obey the Bible when saying "Be not conformed to this world..." When hymns were being considered bad music, it was part of the world. Today it is not, so it isn't bad not to listen to it.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
So whether or not something is "worldly" has to do with how old it is?
Does this mean that if I should go back to school, I could live the life of a bohemian and a libertine because there aren't any more bohemians, and therefore they're not part of the world any more? Or that I could grow my hair long, wear beads and tie-died shirts, tune in, turn on and drop out because the hippie culture is no longer part of the world?
The thing I don't get is this: no anti-CCM advocates ever have any trouble expressing their views in English, despite the fact that:
<UL TYPE=SQUARE><LI>English was invented by pagans.
<LI>The world speaks English. Christians are called out of the world, so we should not use the world's language.
<LI>English has been used to produce works of ungodly philosophy and vile pornography. How can such a filthy language possibly be used of God? We most certainly should never translate the Bible into English; an English Bible is a contradiction, just like a pornographic Bible or a drug-use Bible.
[/list]