I will ask you to show me where I expressed "glee?"
Just a couple of pages back in this very thread:
Luckily for America, Cain's campaign will be over shortly. :applause:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I will ask you to show me where I expressed "glee?"
Luckily for America, Cain's campaign will be over shortly. :applause:
Just a couple of pages back in this very thread:
Don't you find it a bit odd that given the number of accusations against him and all the news conferences held by accusers that don't want to give any details...
That there is still no proof?
Just accusations.
If any of these accusations were true shouldn't there be some sort of proof?
I think his 999 plan is a disaster, that is why I think he will be out of the race.
Why is it so difficult to see that the issue I have with Cain is this policy, not his personal life.
Don't fool yourself, if they had a video of him in the very act of adultery with this woman, you would find a way to justify it.
An apologists is one that seeks to justify someone else's actions.
Noun: apologist
1. A person who argues to defend or justify some policy or institution
[WordWeb.info]
If you think that the republicans, such as Cain hasn't attempted to pawn this off on the democrats and the "liberal" media, after trying to pawn this off on Rick Perry, you are naive.
I said I hope the truth comes out. Do you care about the truth or just what allows you to bash others.
If Cain was innocent, which I doubt based on the number of complaints against him, he should be exonerated. However, since it is fairly obvious that he is guilty, he should drop out of the race. My complaint against Cain has always been his 999 plan.
OK, I stand corrected.
Because of the subject of this thread and because your statement of "glee" was immediately preceded by this statement of yours:
This all boils down to Curtis. Every time he enters a thread confusion follows.
If he could understand the English language most of this would never happen.
I was responding about what mandym said, I never tried to deny it. Then he slithers in and here we are.
Regardless of the confusion, Cain is finished. I am glad because of his ridiculous 999 plan. Now, if he did these things he has been accused of by these women, he should be held accountable. If he is innocent, he should file a law suit and charge them with defamation of character.
If what you say about your intent is true, then it will be evident in future posts.
As far as Cain goes, I would rather him be brought down on issues.
Once even an accusation is leveled against someone concerning anything of a sexual nature, innocent or guilty, they are never looked at the same again.
As far as Cain goes, I would rather him be brought down on issues.
This is the argument good people are hammered with each time a Democrat's moral character comes to light. Time to hammer back.BTW, the major issue Mohler focuses upon, is that the Cain campaign is saying that a private moral issue is not important enough to talk about during a campaign.
This is the argument good people are hammered with each time a Democrat's moral character comes to light. Time to hammer back.
Thanks, Bro. Curtis
I listened to Glen Beck's radio guest today----Ann Coulter----seems she likes Mitt as a candidate
Any thoughts????
No. Clinton's, or any Dem's, dalliances are excused as irrelevant to his qualifications to govern. What's good for the goose . . . (no pun intended.)Aaron------------------you DO mean REPUBLICAN---------don't you???
:laugh::laugh::laugh: