• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Monergism vs Synergism

Reformer

New Member
Thinkingstuff said:
...........So salvation without works is an intrinsic imposibility.........
...........Salvation entirely considered is completed by Grace...........


Please tell me you didn't mean these two statements. If you did, you do not understand the milk of the Word, or even the Gospel in its simplest form.
 

MB

Well-Known Member
Rippon said:
I have gone to the Scriptures and they certainly support the doctrines of grace.You deny the doctrines of grace.At least you are very clear bout that which you deny.



Then you deny biblical election.




What words have I supposedly added?



Agreed.Stop it.




You keep on bringing up that nonsensical claim.Romans 9 does not bear that out.



Only the elect are saved -- no one else.Only those whose names appear in the Lamb's Book of Life -- written before the world began.





Spoken like a tue Semi-Pelagian.BTW,you have no idea what Calvinism is --Just like Ben.And you haven't a clue what hyper-Calvinism is.You need to read more.Read the Word of God in context.Read Church History.Read more so that you will not type foolish things.



Too bad.When you ask the Lord for guidance He may grant you to see that which is very evident to Calvinists as lovers of the Word of God.
If you really loved the word of God you wouldn't distort it the way you do. Poor rippon did you take you medication this morning?
MB
 

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
MB said:
If you really loved the word of God you wouldn't distort it the way you do. Poor rippon did you take you(sic) medication this morning?
MB

What a well-reasoned response.Thanks for your edifying remarks.
 

jcjordan

New Member
MB said:
If you really loved the word of God you wouldn't distort it the way you do. Poor rippon did you take you medication this morning?
MB
Wow, interesting. So, for people to love God and His Word, they need a pill? I've never heard this sort of Arminianism before.
 

Thinkingstuff

Active Member
Reformer said:
Please tell me you didn't mean these two statements. If you did, you do not understand the milk of the Word, or even the Gospel in its simplest form.

Did you read the entire text? Did you understand what I said. Did you just highlight those two areas out of context and comment on them? Should I break it down and explain it more simply? Before we go further we should define what we mean. Then we understand each other in context. Am I to believe that you end salvation with just justification?

BTW how is that any different than saying that a person who has never demonstrated works in their live was probably never saved in the first place. I see salvation as everything in the Christian experience and you seem to just see justification which limits it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Allan

Active Member
Reformer said:
I will pray for your family, hope all is well.:praying:

Reformer
All is going much better.

My wifes uncle was admitted into the hospital and flown to a different one in the same state due to severe cardiac problems and other issues with a very good chance he will die.

As of last report, they took him off the ventilator (sp?) and he was sitting up and doing some short walks.

Though his physical will still take a while to heal (and even then it will never be the same) his spiritual is well and as of shortly before the episode transpired - saved. (praise God! ) He had some really bad blood between his sons and him and he wanted to make amends but never got the opportunity to say he was sorry. Before his salvation it was the only thing he wanted to settle. When his sons were in the hospital room with him and he was coming around enough to think and talk straight, the first thing he said to both his boys is that if he was going to die he wanted to makes sure they were right with God (saved). Now his boys want to take both him and their mother back home the Carolinas with them and keep them close by to take care of them. Something they never cared about before nor even contemplated (according to them).

God is great and greatly to praised, Amen?
 

Allan

Active Member
Allan} Here again said:
God saves us first and then we believe. Yet Jesus states "believe and be saved". The apostles state that we are justified, sanctified, indwelt by the Holy Spirit, righteous and IN Christ, by faith - not before we believe. All of these are what make up the regeneration. Without them one is not regenate no matter how you want to parse it.[\quote]
Then you responded:
Reformer said:
You have got me to thinking, I will ask if you have equated "Irresistible Grace" into the equation, with out it I can see your point, while with it included it looks to me like your theory of "mans participation" falls flat.
Yes, even with 'irresistable grace'. The Reformers did not believe nor did they hold a person was forced to believe but in their view God regenerated man first so that the man of his own volition or will may freely receive the salvation that God desires to impart. You see the axe still falls on the fact that unless man of his own volition believes (whether incorporating irrestable grace or not) no man will ever be saved. Thus man still has a part to play in his salvation, it is still his choice to respond positively in order to be saved. So as you see, my 'theory' does not fall apart even under when the microscope of your view of 'irresistable grace' but maintains the fact that man does indeed participate in his salvation because withouth the man himself choosing to believe that man will not be saved.


Side bar: - What is interesting in scripture is that those things that make one regenerate (justified, sanctified, indwelt by the Holy Spirit, righteous and IN Christ) are never stated to have been imparted or happened except 'by faith'. Thus until one excersizes faith one can not be regenerate or made new (old things are no longer but now all things are made new). Thus no man can be born again unless that man has placed faith in Christ because all are inparted by faith.

This side bar however can be elaborated on in another thread which I have already created a little while back on regarding regeneration, called : Ordos Salutis 2; The Regeneration... :) sounds like a sci-fi movie huh :laugh: I created in order to talk specifically about regeneration from it's orginal thread "Ordos Salutis". I have made two such threads but never really get anyone to participate. I wish to explore the 'how' question which leads to the 'when'. You are welcome to come and look as well as set forth what you understand or that the reformers have stated regarding the questions I have set forth in the thread and OP. It is something I beleive that is crucial to properly understanding the Ordos Salutis. But don't get any who really wish examine it. But come if you want or not - either way may God richly bless you brother.
 

Allan

Active Member
Just correcting my previous posting:

Allan said:
Here again, you have man making a choice that without he decision to choose positively WILL NOT be saved. You STILL have man participating in his salvation so it is not 100% of God.


And here we see a false teaching revealed as is in a few Cals theological understanding.

[That being that] God saves us first and then we believe. Yet Jesus states "believe and be saved". The apostles state that we are justified, sanctified, indwelt by the Holy Spirit, righteous and IN Christ, by faith - not before we believe. All of these are what make up the regeneration. Without them one is not regenate no matter how you want to parse it.
Then you responded:

Reformer said:
You have got me to thinking, I will ask if you have equated "Irresistible Grace" into the equation, with out it I can see your point, while with it included it looks to me like your theory of "mans participation" falls flat.

Yes, even with 'irresistable grace'. The Reformers did not believe nor did they hold a person was forced to believe but in their view God regenerated man first so that the man of his own volition or will may freely receive the salvation that God desires to impart. You see the axe still falls on the fact that unless man of his own volition believes (whether incorporating irrestable grace or not) no man will ever be saved. Thus man still has a part to play in his salvation, it is still his choice to respond positively in order to be saved. So as you see, my 'theory' does not fall apart even under when the microscope of your view of 'irresistable grace' but maintains the fact that man does indeed participate in his salvation because withouth the man himself choosing to believe that man will not be saved.


Side bar: - What is interesting in scripture is that those things that make one regenerate (justified, sanctified, indwelt by the Holy Spirit, righteous and IN Christ) are never stated to have been imparted or happened except 'by faith'. Thus until one excersizes faith one can not be regenerate or made new (old things are no longer but now all things are made new). Thus no man can be born again unless that man has placed faith in Christ because all are inparted by faith.

This side bar however can be elaborated on in another thread which I have already created a little while back on regarding regeneration, called : Ordos Salutis 2; The Regeneration... sounds kinda like a sci-fi movie huh :laugh: I started the thread in order to talk specifically about regeneration apart from it's orginal thread "Ordos Salutis" where the topic orginally began. I have made two such threads but never really get anyone to participate. I wish to explore the 'how' question which leads to the 'when'. You are welcome to come and look as well as set forth what you understand or that the reformers have stated regarding the questions I have set forth in the thread and OP. It is something I beleive that is crucial to properly understanding the Ordos Salutis. But don't get any who really wish examine it. But come if you want or not - either way may God richly bless you brother.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Goldie

New Member
Why do people always insist on putting christians into two "camps" - calvinist or arminian? What about neither? I find it extremely weird, as they say you have to be one or the other. Well, sorry to confuse the issue, but I'm neither, as both are wrong

What I simply believe in is salvation by grace through faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ.

I believe in the eternal security of the believer. I believe that Jesus Christ died for all men, and I believe what the Bible says, "That whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."

It's really so simple, makes one wonder why men go all out to complicate it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thinkingstuff

Active Member
Goldie said:
Why do people always insist on putting christians into two "camps" - calvinist or arminian? What about neither? I find it extremely weird, as they say you have to be one or the other. Well, sorry to confuse the issue, but I'm neither, as both are wrong.

What I simply believe in is salvation by grace through faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ.

I believe in the eternal security of the believer. I believe that Jesus Christ died for all men, and I believe what the Bible says, "That whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."

It's really so simple, makes one wonder why men go all out to complicate it?

I had a friend (a pastor and missionary) who said that he was a Calminiast.
 

Me4Him

New Member
Reformer said:
This is a topic that I believe is a debate over the nature of the Gospel itself. I believe that Synergism is an attack on Gods grace. I guess we should define the two terms first.

Monergism: The belief that God is is the all-determining reality in salvation, which therefore excludes free human participation.

Synergism: The belief in divine - human cooperation in salvation. Or, any belief in human responsibility and ability to freely accepted or reject the grace of salvation

That said I cannot find how Synergism avoids works in salvation. I fully understand that synergist have prevenient grace and will say because God grants us grace first it is not works, but I see this as only delaying the works problem. It would come down to OUR decision, admittedly after some Grace but still our decision. I will also say if I were to agree (and I won't) that we do have the ability to make the decision, then I would have to ask why do some accept and others reject, are some spiritually better than others? Of course not so what made the difference?

I will also say that some may say different amounts of prevenient grace might be granted, but if this true is it not just a different type of Divine Election and reprobation. I saw on one thread where one person said something to the effect of the Bible teaches both, that is a new one to me, I really can't figure out how anyone could come to that conclusion.

I will also note that, as far as I know the only Monergistic theology is Reformed (Calvinistic) Theology. That would also mean that most false religions are some type of Synergism. Right? Man + God = salvation, is the bottom line as far as I can tell. I am truly trying to understand how any Christian could see Synergism as true.


Reformer

Mt 23:37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

Mt 13:15 For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, (saved) and I should heal them.

"Monergism" says it's God/Jesus fault for Israel not being "Converted".

"Synergism", says it's Israel fault for not being "Converted".

"What do you say??
 

MB

Well-Known Member
Goldie said:
Why do people always insist on putting christians into two "camps" - calvinist or arminian? What about neither? I find it extremely weird, as they say you have to be one or the other. Well, sorry to confuse the issue, but I'm neither, as both are wrong

What I simply believe in is salvation by grace through faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ.

I believe in the eternal security of the believer. I believe that Jesus Christ died for all men, and I believe what the Bible says, "That whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."

It's really so simple, makes one wonder why men go all out to complicate it?
I wonder the same thing. It seems that they don't believe it possible to be a Christian with out being either a Calvinist or Arminian.
MB
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
Me4Him said:
Mt 23:37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

Mt 13:15 For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, (saved) and I should heal them.

"Monergism" says it's God/Jesus fault for Israel not being "Converted".

"Synergism", says it's Israel fault for not being "Converted".

"What do you say??
What do I say? Welcome back to the BB :)

I've missed the graph's and charts :D
 

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
MB said:
I wonder the same thing. It seems that they don't believe it possible to be a Christian with out being either a Calvinist or Arminian.
MB

Well there aren't too many semi-Pelagian Christians.There are quite a few Amyraldians running around.But a lot of believers are in the two camps of Calvinism and Arminianism.There are really no more options.
 

AresMan

Active Member
Site Supporter
Allan said:
Yes, even with 'irresistable grace'. The Reformers did not believe nor did they hold a person was forced to believe but in their view God regenerated man first so that the man of his own volition or will may freely receive the salvation that God desires to impart. You see the axe still falls on the fact that unless man of his own volition believes (whether incorporating irrestable grace or not) no man will ever be saved. Thus man still has a part to play in his salvation, it is still his choice to respond positively in order to be saved. So as you see, my 'theory' does not fall apart even under when the microscope of your view of 'irresistable grace' but maintains the fact that man does indeed participate in his salvation because withouth the man himself choosing to believe that man will not be saved.
The question is not about whether man "participates" or not (depending upon how one defines the term). The question is whether salvation is monergistic or synergistic.

If by man's "participation" you mean that his "contribution" is in some way independent or adjoined to God's work wherein God's work is not truly effectual, then I would disagree.

If by man's "participation" you mean this his "contribution" is a part of, or a result of, God's effectual work in his life, then I would agree.

The question is not whether man has to exercise faith to be saved or whether faith comes from man's will. The question is whether man's faith is in some way independent or that it must complement an ineffectual work of God. The question is whether man's faith unto salvation comes by proxy of his fallen nature or that it is characteristic of regeneration.
 

Me4Him

New Member
AresMan said:
The question is not about whether man "participates" or not (depending upon how one defines the term). The question is whether salvation is monergistic or synergistic.

If by man's "participation" you mean that his "contribution" is in some way independent or adjoined to God's work wherein God's work is not truly effectual, then I would disagree.

If by man's "participation" you mean this his "contribution" is a part of, or a result of, God's effectual work in his life, then I would agree.

The question is not whether man has to exercise faith to be saved or whether faith comes from man's will. The question is whether man's faith is in some way independent or that it must complement an ineffectual work of God. The question is whether man's faith unto salvation comes by proxy of his fallen nature or that it is characteristic of regeneration.

Faith and salvation (grace) are separate, People have faith in all types of different religions without being saved.

Calvin's doctrine said that was impossible without being first "regenerated", obviously, from what we see in the world, that's not true.

"CHOOSING" what one "Believes" is a "Choice" given to everyone, and it's this choosing to believe God/Jesus/Scripture/Spirit's call that is the reason God choses to save us,

so "FAITH" is necessary before the "Salvation".

If God is not willing for any to perish, and no one comes to the father "EXCEPT" God calls them, then God is "Obligated" to call all, or be "less than truthful", which is impossible for God.

The Gospel being preached to the whole world, "For a "witness", before the end comes will leave none justified they never had the opportunity to "hear/believe/call on him for salvation.

Ro 10:14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?

Act 2:37, they asked Peter, "WHAT SHALL WE DO", if they had been "predestine" the correct answer would have been there's "NOTHING" you can do.

Ac 2:38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

God knew by "Foreknowledge" who would accept/reject him, but the "Offer" is still made, just as Jesus made the offer to Israel, and they refused.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
I will post this from a thread I attempted to start which no one seems to be interested in. I do want to make my views on the Biblical Doctrines of Grace known.

Folks might be taken a little aback by Monergism vs Synergism so I thought I could put it a little differently.

“Holy God: I am eternally grateful for your sovereign grace through which You chose me unto salvation through the finished work of Jesus Christ.

I now understand that:
a. You chose me through no merit of my own.
b. Though I was spiritually dead in trespass and sin You made me spiritually alive,
c. You granted unto me salvation, and
d. You made me accepted in the beloved.

Because this was done solely by the work of the Holy Spirit I cannot boast but can only say as did the Psalmist my heart shall rejoice in thy salvation." [Psalm 13:5]
 
Top