Them Egyptian soldiers at the bottom of the Red Sea ?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It's an allegory for the need for complete holiness in our lives; we must put to death all that is sinfulYou deny the literal plain truth of the text. You are hopeless. You tell me, what did God mean by "This is what the Lord Almighty says: ‘I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. [3] 3 Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’" ?
LOL. Sinful camels, sheep, and donkeys.It's an allegory for the need for complete holiness in our lives; we must put to death all that is sinful
I already have. And it's your interpretation that has God down committing genocide; mine doesn't.You are accusing God of Genocide. His word plainly tells is what He did.
Again, explain I Sam 15. I am sure you won't because you can't.
Origen, is that you?It's an allegory for the need for complete holiness in our lives; we must put to death all that is sinful
That is utter nonsense. Explain how Saul failing to put the animals to death angered God?It's an allegory for the need for complete holiness in our lives; we must put to death all that is sinful
And thus also anagogicalOrigen, is that you?
You are conforming God to be in your image. Very dangerous ground to be on.I already have. And it's your interpretation that has God down committing genocide; mine doesn't.
Again, you're thinking too literally with a modernist mindset. Try and read it how it was meant to be readThat is utter nonsense. Explain how Saul failing to put the animals to death angered God?
And you're re-writing Him as a mass murderer. Surely that's more dangerousYou are conforming God to be in your image. Very dangerous ground to be on.
Those two statements are contradictory. To believe the second you would have to believe that God is no better than Hitler, Stalin or Milosevic
Foolish argument. You want earthly labels based on earthly laws, to apply to God. That is most arrogant & presumptious. God determines the day every soul takes first & last breath. What you may choose to do with your time here will determine your relationship with Him. He gives us all that we need to accept or deny Him. Gracious. Do not presume to judge His goodness by your earthly standards. Foolish.How can you love still less worship a being who commits genocide? Why is this even a matter for discussion?! SMH
I am reading it how it was meant to be read. You are denying the plain truths of the passage.Again, you're thinking too literally with a modernist mindset. Try and read it how it was meant to be read
Whoa there hoss, you are rewriting scripture.And you're re-writing Him as a mass murderer. Surely that's more dangerous
The scripture says what it says. You have NO understanding of it. I believe you calling me blasphemous is an issue for the mods to handle.Your 'plain truth' has Him as committing genocide, which is blasphemous. Therefore there is no way that can be correct
I'm not calling you blasphemous, rather your interpretation.The scripture says what it says. You have NO understanding of it. I believe you calling me blasphemous is an issue for the mods to handle.