The remission for our sins was and is purchased by the blood shedding for our sins by the MessiahNo, Scripture repeatedly instructs us to judge "fruit", that spiritual life begats spiritual fruit, that we are judged by our works whether good or bad. Scripture is against you here.
The text for doctrine is "what is written" in God's Word.
The text of Spiritual life is the fruit of the Spirit (the things God produces).
You seem to be making up phrases that sound Christian but are not.
"The blood stained Gospel"??? The Gospel is not stained with blood. It may sound pious but it is not.
We are saved in Christ, but we cannot test if we are in Chriat by saying we are in Christ. We are saved to do good works prepared beforehand that we should do them.
Actually, particular Baptists are also Reformed Baptist, and as such, were and are strongly CalvinisticNo, "particular Baptist" is not another name for Calvinist. The majority of Baptists historically in the States were Arminianism (adopted in part from the Methodists, which was for a long time the largest Protestant denomination in the US).
There was a time when no Baptist (thise who practice believers baptism, not a particular denomination) were Calvinists.
For most of our history Calvinistic Baptists were a minority.
Not sure that any of that matters. There are a lot of Mormons, but that dies not mean they are correct.
Yes, at one point, a majority of Baptists in America adhered to Calvinist theology. While Calvinism has always been one strand within Baptist theology, it was particularly dominant in the early days of American Baptist churches, especially among "Particular Baptists". However, over time, particularly in the 20th century, there was a shift away from Calvinism within certain Baptist groups, especially the Southern Baptist Convention.No, "particular Baptist" is not another name for Calvinist. The majority of Baptists historically in the States were Arminianism (adopted in part from the Methodists, which was for a long time the largest Protestant denomination in the US).
There was a time when no Baptist (thise who practice believers baptism, not a particular denomination) were Calvinists.
For most of our history Calvinistic Baptists were a minority.
Not sure that any of that matters. There are a lot of Mormons, but that dies not mean they are correct.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
- Early Baptist History:
From the 17th century onwards, both Calvinist and Arminian Baptists existed in the American colonies.
- Particular Baptists:
The early Baptist churches, particularly in the Middle Colonies, were heavily influenced by Calvinism. They were often referred to as Particular Baptists, emphasizing the belief in a definite atonement (that Christ died for the elect).
- The Great Awakening:
The Great Awakening in the 18th century further strengthened Calvinism among Baptists, leading to the rise of "Separate Baptists" who were strongly Calvinistic.
- Shift away from Calvinism:
While Calvinism was dominant, it wasn't the only perspective. Southern Baptist historian Thomas Nettles notes that even within Calvinistic Baptists, there were different emphases and interpretations. In the late 18th and 19th centuries, a movement away from strict Calvinism began to emerge, particularly within the Southern Baptist Convention.
- Present Day:
Today, while Calvinism remains a significant theological perspective within some Baptist churches, there is a wide range of views. Many Baptists identify as Arminian, holding that God's grace is available to all who believe.