Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Amen! And God bless Baptist4life. And God bless Salamander, and the rest of the regular gang (in no particular order) rbell, Jerome, C4K, mcdirector, AntennaFarmer, robycop, marcia, Askjo, EdSutton, Ed Edwards, Dr. Bob, gb93433, Deacon, Pastor Larry, TomVols, Jim1999, sag38, TCGreek, Rippon, JohnofJapan, annsi, because of grace, stilllearning, jonathan.borland, HankD, tinytim, Logos1560, Amy.G, thomas15, Trotter, Keith M, GoldDragon (I'm sure I've left some out, sorry). (Ziggy, I know you're out there)Baptist4life said:God bless, mexdeaf! :applause:
My thanks to you, TCGreek. I especially enjoy your insights into the Greek language. Everyone here adds something special. I like to hear the ladies perspective. Deacon is especially great in matters of the Psalms. And what would be this debate forum without those with different opinions? Frankly, I'd like to see more posts from some of these folks. I always like hearing from those outside the US, too. I respect Rippon's comparisons; and JohnofJapan on translation methodology. And then there's EdSutton's humor!TCGreek said:Thanks, Franklin.
rbell said:OK, folks, move along...Kum-ba-ya sing-a-long is over...
![]()
tinytim said:Yeah, thanks franklin!. .. I can't wait to meet many of you also...
Gee.. I go off to read my new TNIV Bible I got today thanks to TCGreek, and Zondervan.. and I come back and everyone is getting along in the VERSIONS forum...
TC, was there something in that TNIV that zoomed me into the twilight zone?
mcdirector said:OK, I stopped by Zondervan's on the way home from school and got one of the 8 TNIVs they had. It was one of the 2 study Bibles.
They had dozens of many others btw including the ESV.
I did not get a chance to start reading it though. *sobbing in my hankie*
tinytim said:I love you, you love me, we're a happy family with a great big hug and a kiss from ..... uh... nope, ain't goin there!:tongue3: :laugh:
franklinmonroe said:Amen! And God bless Baptist4life. And God bless ... the rest of the regular gang (in no particular order) ... EdSutton...
Hey! No fair!!franklinmonroe said:I always like hearing from those outside the US, too. I respect Rippon's comparisons; and JohnofJapan on translation methodology. And then there's EdSutton's humor!
EdMoe: "I say, Jasper, what comes after seventy-five?"
Larry: "Seventy-six!"
Moe: "That's the Spirit!"
Of course there is, Ed. I didn't mean that there wasn't.EdSutton said:... I think that at least sometimes, there is a bit of substance to some of my posts, anyway...
Oh, I know what you meant.franklinmonroe said:Of course there is, Ed. I didn't mean that there wasn't.
mcdirector said:OK, I stopped by Zondervan's on the way home from school and got one of the 8 TNIVs they had. It was one of the 2 study Bibles.
They had dozens of many others btw including the ESV.
I did not get a chance to start reading it though. *sobbing in my hankie*
Yes you did.franklinmonroe said:Of course there is, Ed. I didn't mean that there wasn't.
Well, you forget one difference: Written comment VS oral comment.annsni said:Jesus was as much Joseph's child as I am my father's child. He's not my father by blood but by adoption. So I can't call him "father"? To EVERYONE who knew the family of Joseph, Jesus was his son.
You are confused between written comment and oral comment. Luke 2:48 is Mary's ORAL answer to Jesus.Mexdeaf said:Luke 2:48- And when they saw him, they were amazed: and his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing.
Mary even called Joseph Jesus' father- was she wrong??
Askjo said:Well, you forget one difference: Written comment VS oral comment.
All of the gospels were passed down by oral tradition and recorded in writing many years later. The second part of that verse is called direct discourse.Askjo said:You are confused between written comment and oral comment. Luke 2:48 is Mary's ORAL answer to Jesus.
By your implication (that Mary's statement does not need to be accurate because it is "oral") we would be left with only two choices: that either Mary was mistaken, or she was lying. It impossible to believe that Mary herself could be confused about Joseph's role, so she wasn't factually ignorant; and it is doubtful she would lie since she knew that Jesus would not be deceived (it is ineffectual to misrepresent the truth to someone who is knowledgeable of the facts). While the Bible does record some 'true lies' (I think of Samson), this is NOT one of them. Clearly, Mary is neither in error nor bearing false witness here.Askjo said:You are confused between written comment and oral comment. Luke 2:48 is Mary's ORAL answer to Jesus.