• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

My take on Andy Stanley and Emergent pastors

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
OK, since I have no clue of what Emergent means, please let me know the proper defenition. If I'm wrong I will apologize.

The Emergent group/cohort is a leadership segment of a Christian theological/ecclesiological sub-culture which seeks to rediscover and recast the Gospel message in a highly contextualized manner to more authentically communicate Christian theological claims and ethical norms to a post-Christian culture. They, generally speaking, embrace radical post-structuralist hermeneutics (ala Fish, Rorty, Foucault, and Derrida, etc) and cast a post-liberal vision for theological re-formation that is specifically targetted at non-believers. This post-liberal theological vision has, in the end, primarily objected to the theological positions of conservative evangelicalism and replied by recasting late 19th Century Liberalism akin to the Modernist controversies of that era stretching to the first quarter of the twentieth century. The group has embraced theological teachings which radically derivate from conservative evangelical scholarship and has ended up being post-positivist, universalist/inclusivist, feminist, and biblical errantist in its outworkings. The unofficial, but ironically group identified leaders, include Brian McLaren, Doug Pagitt, Tony Jones, and maybe a few others. IMHO, this group is increasingly isolated from the evangelical conversations they sought to shape.

SolaSaint said:
Again I think Andy Stanley is a wonderful Christian man and preacher. As I said in my post I agree with most all he says. So don't think I'm bashing Stanley so much as I'm worried that he is wrongly painting conservative Christians as haters. Here is his comment from his last sermon:

""Christians, he said, are viewed as being “judgmental, homophobic, moralists” who think they are the only ones going to heaven and who “secretly relish the fact that everyone else is going to hell.”"

This is the way he is painting Christians to his listeners. Are you pleased with this?

I think he's 100% correct. Notice his wording "Christians...are viewed as..." We have the data for this. The lost and dying world believes all this stuff (and more) about us. Go pick up (or check out) UnChristian by Dave Kinnanmon and Gabe Lyons and Next Christians by Gabe Lyons. They talk all about these views.

Basically (to sum up UnChristian, the authors took polling and interview data they did with outsiders (non-Christians) 18-34 (I think this age range is correct) and asked them how they viewed Christianity. The data, the raw data, is amazing and reinforces all these conclusions.

I think it is both honest and necessary to have this conversation. Heck, look around this forum and you see a lot of posts to back this up. The whole conversation about the nature of nouthetic counseling is my first salvo. We, Christians, aren't known by the marks which the early church was known by...our love for each other. Also, Christians in America are highly anti-intellectual and perceived to be hateful. Listen if some of this is incorrect so be it, but I think we all need to have the conversation.

When I hear the Republican Party being touted by most evangelicals as the way to get stuff done or the "Christian" political party that is a HUGE part of the problem. Andy is trying to address this as honestly as possible. In our context a huge part of our ministry is 20somethings who are very disenfranchised with Christianity. We have to work very hard to undo the damage done by well meaning but biblicall incorrect teachings. For a lot of millennials how Christians are saying things is just as important as what they're saying.

So, I still challenge your statements. I think (as I have read you) you have sought to label Andy Stanley and then criticize his ministry and message here unduly. You said it yourself he didn't actually say that Christian are homophobic, well he never did and never said they were. So maybe its time to be a little more careful with our rebukes of leaders/preachers. :)
 

SolaSaint

Well-Known Member
I explained that he didn't call Christians these things very well, so please don't try to put words in my mouth. I see my version of Emergent is very close to what you have posted, thank you.

I understand where you come from here, but I still feel Andy is building a strawman here for unchurched people to knock down and conquer. I'm not trying to say his ministry is wrong, just this approach.

I have a question. Can you really say any Christian you know is a homophobic? How many Christians do you know who secretly wish unchurched people burn in hell. You don't think this is building a strawman? I don't know any Christian who is homophobic and I've never heard anyone relish anyone burning in hell. If these staements were true I would be on the bandwagon with you and Andy.
 

mandym

New Member
""Whether you agree with Rick Warren or not one thing is for sure. He is not Emergent. And there is a big difference between the Emerging and Emergent movements. The emergent movement is the far left wing radical side of things. ""

Well I don't agree much with Rick Warren, I have researched him very much and I see a lot of what he was saying 10 years ago, now the Emergents are saying. I think Emergent is too wide to be nailed down. Surely Warren is Seeker Sensative and the Emergents are not. But Warren is like Stanley in his disdain for the conservative church as he also demonizes it.

How do polititians get converts to change to their point of view? Sometimes they demonize their opponent. Well Stanley appears to making an opponent out of traditional churches with his dmonization. IMO

You need to be careful not to confuse or conflate "Emergent" with "Emerging" these are two very distinct movement with some similarities.
 

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I understand where you come from here, but I still feel Andy is building a strawman here for unchurched people to knock down and conquer. I'm not trying to say his ministry is wrong, just this approach.

Well I completely disagree. Listen we're basically at the "this is my position" "this is your position" and neither of us is going to move. He's not setting up a strawman, instead I'd say he's confronting a non-believers' strawman.

SolaSaint said:
I have a question. Can you really say any Christian you know is a homophobic? How many Christians do you know who secretly wish unchurched people burn in hell. You don't think this is building a strawman? I don't know any Christian who is homophobic and I've never heard anyone relish anyone burning in hell. If these staements were true I would be on the bandwagon with you and Andy.

I've met plenty of Christians that I'd say were pretty homophobic. One of the most passionate preachers against homosexuality I've ever encountered, who spewed vitriol of levels I can't stand to remember, ended up getting caught with two other men in a sexual situation. Clearly this isn't everyone, but it is a lot. I've met plenty of believers who will say deeply homophobic things when they believe you're on their side or are trying to flesh out your position. Likewise I've met my share of believers (including some around here) who do appreciate (I wouldn't say relish) the idea of judgment for those who are away from God. They see eternal condemnation as justice. I've seen and heard a lot from Christians in the pews and Christians in the puplit. Honestly, I completely understand and see the point of the books I mentioned above. I think our place in this world is that bad and I'm thankful guys like Stanley are willing to stand up and say "this is what you think of us" this is actually "what we're supposed to be" as an apologetic and teaching.
 

SolaSaint

Well-Known Member
Well I guess I don't get out much. I have never been around such people. I have heard preaching against homosexuality but never towards homosexuals. Preaching that unrepentant sin deserves justice isn't hateful IMO, unless it is done with malice towards someone.

As you say we are at different ends of the argument here and I feel Stanley is using a fring few to make Christianity out to be horrible these days.
 

SolaSaint

Well-Known Member
You need to be careful not to confuse or conflate "Emergent" with "Emerging" these are two very distinct movement with some similarities.

You have lost me now. To me that is like saying there is a difference between a Christian and a Christ follower. :smilewinkgrin:

I know Warren promotes guys like McLaren and Kimble and Stanley and I truly think these are all Emergent. Now I think Emergent is a very wide net that catches many varieties of fish. All of the ones I have listed make the same statements about demonizing the church. I have read them all.
 

mandym

New Member
You have lost me now. To me that is like saying there is a difference between a Christian and a Christ follower. :smilewinkgrin:

No you have conflated things. The difference is a lot like the left and the right.

I know Warren promotes guys like McLaren and Kimble and Stanley and I truly think these are all Emergent. Now I think Emergent is a very wide net that catches many varieties of fish. All of the ones I have listed make the same statements about demonizing the church. I have read them all.

I doubt Warren promotes heretics like McLaren and Kimble.
 

humblethinker

Active Member
Besides, it is clear several in here don't understand the difference between these guys and the Emergent folks. I've been in conversation with the Emergent folks for about 15 years now, there is a HUGE difference between the groups. Stanley and Warren are not, absolutely not Emergent.

:thumbsup:
Thank you preachinjesus... this is just getting rediculous.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
basically it is a post modern church that tends to end up being liberal/Left wing Evangelical in theology!
 

SaggyWoman

Active Member
Sometimes we waste a lot of energy complaining about others that we could be spending the same energy on winning, ie loving ie preaching to ie sharing to with for et al the lost.
 

SolaSaint

Well-Known Member
Sometimes we waste a lot of energy complaining about others that we could be spending the same energy on winning, ie loving ie preaching to ie sharing to with for et al the lost.

I hear you, but I don't see exposing things that are contrary to scriptures a s a waste of time expecially if it helps steer God's people towards thr truth.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I hear you, but I don't see exposing things that are contrary to scriptures a s a waste of time expecially if it helps steer God's people towards thr truth.

Did the Apostle Paul see defending the faith as vital, or did he just knuckle under to current times?
 

SaggyWoman

Active Member
I hear you, but I don't see exposing things that are contrary to scriptures a s a waste of time expecially if it helps steer God's people towards thr truth.

While I respect that, I often hear a lot of air about this that and the third when fighting the minutia causes more issues than teaching the truth and then having people compare the truth to what they are experiencing. What better way to know a fraud than to know the reality.
 
Top