What do you think of name calling and sarcasm? Is it ever 'Christian?'
Keep in mind that Jesus did both these things. He called people brood of vipers, he called Herod a fox (Luke 13:32), and even though he said addressing someone as a fool puts you in danger of hell fire, he himself did that (Matthew 23:17). Paul did also (I Corinthians 15:36).
As for sarcasm, in the best example not all translations read it just that way, but the KJV reads Matthew 26:45, as He returns for the third time to the 3 disciples in the garden to find them sleeping, he says, "Sleep on now-- take your rest!" Did He really want them to do that? or was it like 2 friends who disagree on a building project and one finally says, "Oh do it your own stupid way!"
Does the fact that Jesus, and Paul, addressed people as fools show that that is not really a damnable sin? Or is it not so only for 'inspired' speakers or writers (and who makes the determination?). Or is Paul, at least of the 2, indeed damned? While I don't think so, of course, is it then a mistake to understand scripture as a "literalist?"
Keep in mind that Jesus did both these things. He called people brood of vipers, he called Herod a fox (Luke 13:32), and even though he said addressing someone as a fool puts you in danger of hell fire, he himself did that (Matthew 23:17). Paul did also (I Corinthians 15:36).
As for sarcasm, in the best example not all translations read it just that way, but the KJV reads Matthew 26:45, as He returns for the third time to the 3 disciples in the garden to find them sleeping, he says, "Sleep on now-- take your rest!" Did He really want them to do that? or was it like 2 friends who disagree on a building project and one finally says, "Oh do it your own stupid way!"
Does the fact that Jesus, and Paul, addressed people as fools show that that is not really a damnable sin? Or is it not so only for 'inspired' speakers or writers (and who makes the determination?). Or is Paul, at least of the 2, indeed damned? While I don't think so, of course, is it then a mistake to understand scripture as a "literalist?"