I'm still waiting for all your facts Martin. If ya got em flaunt em. Lay em on us brother.
Working on the next point...might take awhile gotta work longer hours so I can afford the gas to work longer hours.
Btw, would you please define "run away government" for me Martin? I'd like to compare it with what the founders said. If you don't mind.
But poncho, Clinton signed the regieme change papers with the U.N., concerning Iraq, 11/1/1998. This while a half million Iraqis died due to sanctions. ( I found that on you tube, BTW. You are correct, Albright was fine with all the dead Iraqis.)
http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm
Little something something from around 1996...
[SIZE=+1]
Forging A New U.S.-Israeli Relationship[/SIZE]
In recent years, Israel invited active U.S. intervention in Israel’s domestic and foreign policy for two reasons: to overcome domestic opposition to "land for peace" concessions the Israeli public could not digest, and to lure Arabs — through money, forgiveness of past sins, and access to U.S. weapons — to negotiate. This strategy, which required funneling American money to repressive and aggressive regimes, was risky, expensive, and very costly for both the U.S. and Israel, and placed the United States in roles is should neither have nor want.
Israel can make a clean break from the past and establish a new vision for the U.S.-Israeli partnership based on self-reliance, maturity and mutuality — not one focused narrowly on territorial disputes. Israel’s new strategy — based on a
shared philosophy of peace through strength — reflects continuity with Western values by stressing that Israel is
self-reliant, does not need U.S. troops in any capacity to defend it, including on the Golan Heights, and can manage its own affairs. Such self-reliance will grant Israel greater freedom of action and remove a significant lever of pressure used against it in the past.
To reinforce this point, the Prime Minister can use his forthcoming visit to announce that Israel is now
mature enough to cut itself free immediately from at least U.S. economic aid and loan guarantees at least, which prevent economic reform. [Military aid is separated for the moment until adequate arrangements can be made to ensure that Israel will not encounter supply problems in the means to defend itself]. As outlined in another Institute report, Israel can become self-reliant only by, in a bold stroke rather than in increments,
liberalizing its economy, cutting taxes, relegislating a free-processing zone, and selling-off public lands and enterprises — moves which will electrify and find support from a broad bipartisan spectrum of key pro-Israeli Congressional leaders, including Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich.
Israel can under these conditions better cooperate with the U.S. to counter real threats to the region and the West’s security. Mr. Netanyahu can highlight his desire to cooperate more closely with the United States on anti-missile defense in order to remove the threat of blackmail which even a weak and distant army can pose to either state. Not only would such cooperation on missile defense counter a tangible physical threat to Israel’s survival, but it would
broaden Israel’s base of support among many in the United States Congress who may know little about Israel, but care very much about missile defense. Such broad support could be helpful in the effort to move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.
To anticipate U.S. reactions and plan ways to manage and constrain those reactions, Prime Minister Netanyahu can formulate the policies and stress themes he favors in language familiar to the Americans by tapping into themes of American administrations during the Cold War which apply well to Israel. If Israel wants to test certain propositions that require a benign American reaction, then the best time to do so is before November, 1996.
SOURCE...
Keep in mind that the type of
"foreign aid" they are speaking of is un-constitutional. Being a limited government guy I'm sure you can appreciate this Martin.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/FONT]