• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

#NEVERTRUMP/#THIRD-PARTY-SUICIDE-MISSION Recruitment

stevewm1963

Member
Site Supporter
pretty much. I have not offically left the GOP but my husband and I are looking for alternatives. Neither one of us wants to be associated with Trump in any way shape or from. I figure right after the convention and it is offical we will be done. To paraphrase Reagan we are not leaving the GOP the GOP left us. Besides Trump has made it clear he neither wants nor desires my conservative vote and I will respect him on that one issue.
I'm done as well after the convention! There is no candidate worthy of my vote!
 

Luke2427

Active Member
In light of the fact that PP receives about 80% of their revenues from abortions, I would say that they exist to do abortions.
It is still non sequitur to demand that just because he said they do "wonderful things" that he thus supports abortion.

He could have spoken in ignorance. Or, you could be right. Upwards of 20% of their activities are not abortions and he could have been talking about that.

What we know, again, is that he has vowed to try to defund them if they continue to perform abortions and that he has hired a pro-life champion as his domestic policy advisor.
 

Luke2427

Active Member
Except it shows how out of touch he is with the pro-life movement, that he claims to be a strong proponent off. I don't know a single person that is pro-life that would say anything good about Planned Parenthood. It also shows he is not willing to take the time to get to know the issues, he just throws things out there to see how they are received. He made 3 different positions on abortion in 3 days after that debate all of which showed that he was not in the pro-life camp, but it is his first one he said that I think is the closest to the truth of his position which can be none other than pro-abortion. To defend Planned Parenthood and to spread their lies is to be pro-abortion.

I think you are probably right. He probably is out of touch with the pro-life community. That STILL doesn't necessitate that he is for abortion.
 

stevewm1963

Member
Site Supporter
Correct me if I'm wrong but as Christians are we not suppose to refrain from participating in anything ungodly? This is about the most ungodly election I can recall since I've been old enough to vote! Or can we just be part time Christians?(sarcasm)
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Correct me if I'm wrong but as Christians are we not suppose to refrain from participating in anything ungodly? This is about the most ungodly election I can recall since I've been old enough to vote! Or can we just be part time Christians?(sarcasm)

It is amazing the lengths that some Christians will go to rationalize their support of a man that embodies every one of the seven deadly sins. He's a serial adulterer that builds casinos. What a godly example he is!
 

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Atta-boy!
free-happy-smileys-345.gif
I’m sure your commitment to vote for the third party, even though no viable alternative exist yet
alone-in-desert.gif
, will be greatly appreciated by the GOP establishment who prefer party suicide as long as they keep their jobs.

It is unsurprising that your reaction to my post is a churlish, degrading, emoticon filled replied that doesn't interact but only rebukes.

Are all Trump supporters entirely incapable of engagement?

Here's the deal: voting in a federal constitutional republic was about winning. It is about voting for those individuals who best represent your ideals. The viability of a candidate, in our system, only extends to how they represent the ideals of the ones voting for them. I am neither Republican nor Democrat. Both parties are awash in corruption and this election will be an additional proof of that.

respect-060.gif
Even if means under Hillary’s progressive agenda.
respect-061.gif

Clinton and Trump are two sides of the same coin. Look at their policy proposals. They are almost identical (other than some rhetoric about a wall which will never happen.) Voting for either is voting for the other. I simply refuse to be part of such evil.

Thank you for your meaningful contribution to help determine the upcoming election results and being against any real GOP party change!

How is capitulating your moral authority ever going to bring change?
 

blessedwife318

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is unsurprising that your reaction to my post is a churlish, degrading, emoticon filled replied that doesn't interact but only rebukes.

Are all Trump supporters entirely incapable of engagement?
I'm still waiting for a real engagement. I had a Trumpbot on Facebook post on MY wall how hateful I was for being #NEVERTRUMP and then he blocked me for "attacking" him. I'm not even sure what the whole point was.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Can anyone remind me when we ever had a "godly election"?

1789? Only white men were allowed.

Just facing reality.


HankD
 
Last edited:

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is amazing the lengths that some Christians will go to rationalize their support of a man that embodies every one of the seven deadly sins. He's a serial adulterer that builds casinos. What a godly example he is!
ITL - how many and what kind of "deadly" sins must a candidate refrain from to be judged as a "godly example" worthy of our vote?. Who has ever qualified?

Jimmy Carter who bore witness that he was a born again Christian also publicly confessed that he had committed deadly sins in his heart?

I understand your thoughts and empathize with you however.

When I was in the military (USAF) JFK was our president who I loved but was shattered when his secret sins were revealed.

FWIW I am no fan of Donald Trump

HankD
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I used the phrase "godly example" in reference to a candidate.
Who used the term "godly election"? Anyone?
Anyone?
(Bueller?)

Sorry ITL, in this post I was not referring to you... It was stevewm1963
"Correct me if I'm wrong but as Christians are we not suppose to refrain from participating in anything ungodly? This is about the most ungodly election I can recall since I've been old enough to vote! Or can we just be part time Christians?(sarcasm)"

HankD
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sorry ITL, in this post I was not referring to you... It was stevewm1963
"Correct me if I'm wrong but as Christians are we not suppose to refrain from participating in anything ungodly? This is about the most ungodly election I can recall since I've been old enough to vote! Or can we just be part time Christians?(sarcasm)"

HankD

Ah yes....I see that now. Thanks for the info.
 

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Can anyone remind me when we ever had a "godly election"?

1789? Only white men were allowed.

I think this is a legitimate point. We have imperfect elections because we have imperfect people. Expecting a clearly unsaved person to act holy is the height of idiocy as well. We aren't electing a "pastor in chief" and we shouldn't expect anyone looking to higher office to be so. Frankly, I don't think anyone in a national office (Legislative and Executive branches) is free from corruption.

However, this isn't my issue with Mr Trump. He is, imho, a terrible candidate who is, as I've mentioned, no different than his future Democratic opponent. Between the two, I choose neither. This decision isn't based on his attempts at portraying a Christian witness or some moral standard he couldn't possibly achieve, but rather that he is a man who is more corrupt than any in recent memory, one with such bad ideas they actually make you want to run screaming back to English rule, and someone with such misogynistic, sexist language that I want nothing to do with this man leading our nation.

I just believe there is a candidate in the third party group that better represents my ideals and understanding of governance. That's where I'll be placing my vote in November.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think this is a legitimate point. We have imperfect elections because we have imperfect people. Expecting a clearly unsaved person to act holy is the height of idiocy as well. We aren't electing a "pastor in chief" and we shouldn't expect anyone looking to higher office to be so. Frankly, I don't think anyone in a national office (Legislative and Executive branches) is free from corruption.

However, this isn't my issue with Mr Trump. He is, imho, a terrible candidate who is, as I've mentioned, no different than his future Democratic opponent. Between the two, I choose neither. This decision isn't based on his attempts at portraying a Christian witness or some moral standard he couldn't possibly achieve, but rather that he is a man who is more corrupt than any in recent memory, one with such bad ideas they actually make you want to run screaming back to English rule, and someone with such misogynistic, sexist language that I want nothing to do with this man leading our nation.

I just believe there is a candidate in the third party group that better represents my ideals and understanding of governance. That's where I'll be placing my vote in November.
PIJ, if by some miracle God presents a candidate and magnifies him or her in the eyes of the people then I would definitely stand behind him/her.

However it seems we have a man who in the final analysis would be better than Marxist Billary (though there is a measure of doubt).

We are in a dilemma.

Votes for a write-in are unpredictable concerning the final outcome and in all probability would not result in the write-in's election.

Just facing reality.

HankD
 

Benjamin

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm still waiting for a real engagement.

Sorry, been real busy and have barely looked into the thread not having a enough time to engage properly, but I have been reading you some and maybe I'll get a couple days to work on straightening you out on a few issues.
Zlaugh2.gif
 

blessedwife318

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sorry, been real busy and have barely looked into the thread not having a enough time to engage properly, but I have been reading you some and maybe I'll get a couple days to work on straightening you out on a few issues.
Zlaugh2.gif
Well I'll give you a hint if you really want to engage properly, you are not off to a great start.
 

stevewm1963

Member
Site Supporter
Sorry ITL, in this post I was not referring to you... It was stevewm1963
"Correct me if I'm wrong but as Christians are we not suppose to refrain from participating in anything ungodly? This is about the most ungodly election I can recall since I've been old enough to vote! Or can we just be part time Christians?(sarcasm)"

HankD
Perhaps then we should stay away from elections if our leaders are not suppose to be Christian or strive to be and focus on the more important issue of leading those unsaved to Christ! How can we be Christ like if we attempt to place evil men/women in a position to cause further damage? We are after all disciples of Christ aren't we? I supported a Christian to lead our nation and now he is out of the race! I will not be voting!
 
Top