New Chauvin Trial?

[Reformed1689]

I accepted the legitimacy of Trump's election in 2016. I rejected the Russian conspiracy theory of the left. I now accept the legitimacy of Biden's election in 2020 and I reject the conspiracy theory of the right.

God is accomplishing exactly what He wants.

You are talking about two totally different things. It wasn't Russian Conspiracy it was flat out fabrication. Big difference.

And yes, there are some on the right that are talking about concerted efforts to throw the election with ballot machines and such. That is not what MANY on the right complain about. We are crying foul about the intentional breaking of laws in the name of the pandemic to reach a certain outcome.

 

[AustinC]

You are talking about two totally different things. It wasn't Russian Conspiracy it was flat out fabrication. Big difference.

And yes, there are some on the right that are talking about concerted efforts to throw the election with ballot machines and such. That is not what MANY on the right complain about. We are crying foul about the intentional breaking of laws in the name of the pandemic to reach a certain outcome.

The right is whining for no good reason. Donald Trump needs to go home and spend his life playing golf.

 

[Aaron]

I accepted the legitimacy of Trump's election in 2016. I rejected the Russian conspiracy theory of the left. I now accept the legitimacy of Biden's election in 2020 and I reject the conspiracy theory of the right.

Bull.

 

[Aaron]

God is accomplishing exactly what He wants.

As He did when Absolom usurped the throne, and as he did through Satan with Job.

You are attempting to hallow like things.

 

[Reformed1689]

The right is whining for no good reason. Donald Trump needs to go home and spend his life playing golf.

Then you are being willfully ignorant. Perhaps you should go home.

 

[canadyjd]

.....
Chauvin had an opportunity to argue his case. The jury ruled against him. People on this board need to get over it. This foolish conspiracy theory makes people here look like racists.

Chauvin still has an opportunity to argue his case through the appeals process. Surely you are not denying he has that legal right, are you?

No conspiracy theory at all. A juror that convicted him lied to the judge about his knowledge of the case and his willingness to be unbiased.

Given this one fact (not even considering the city agreeing to $27 million settlement during jury selection, no sequestration, Aunti Maxine stirring the crowd, etc....) the conviction must be overturned and a new trial ordered.

peace to you

 

[AustinC]

Chauvin still has an opportunity to argue his case through the appeals process. Surely you are not denying he has that legal right, are you?

No conspiracy theory at all. A juror that convicted him lied to the judge about his knowledge of the case and his willingness to be unbiased.

Given this one fact (not even considering the city agreeing to $27 million settlement during jury selection, no sequestration, Aunti Maxine stirring the crowd, etc....) the conviction must be overturned and a new trial ordered.

peace to you

Sure there is a process to appeal.
There is an alleged juror issue, which the judge will look at. This is all standard procedure. It doesn't mean the case needs to be retried.
What is curious to me is why people desperately want Derek Chauvin to be innocent. It comes across as racist.

 

[canadyjd]

Sure there is a process to appeal.
There is an alleged juror issue, which the judge will look at. This is all standard procedure. It doesn't mean the case needs to be retried.
What is curious to me is why people desperately want Derek Chauvin to be innocent. It comes across as racist.

Most people have told you they want a fair trial, not a specific outcome. This info about the juror is stunning and clearly shows biased. I can’t imagine a new trial will be denied.

I was part of the group that thought Chauvin was guilty and argued that position on this board. After hearing the evidence, I changed my mind.

The prosecution argued Mr.Floyd died from a heart attack due to low blood oxygen levels that was caused by the police restraint (knee on the neck).

The autopsy revealed normal blood oxygen levels (98%), therefore, the prosecutions theory of cause of death is proven false.

I have no support for Chauvin. His actions were disgusting. But according to the evidence, he did not cause Mr.Floyd’s death.

peace to you

 

[Yeshua1]

Sure there is a process to appeal.
There is an alleged juror issue, which the judge will look at. This is all standard procedure. It doesn't mean the case needs to be retried.
What is curious to me is why people desperately want Derek Chauvin to be innocent. It comes across as racist.

Not to be retried to be proven innocent, but to have a fair trial!

 

[Yeshua1]

Most people have told you they want a fair trial, not a specific outcome. This info about the juror is stunning and clearly shows biased. I can’t imagine a new trial will be denied.

I was part of the group that thought Chauvin was guilty and argued that position on this board. After hearing the evidence, I changed my mind.

The prosecution argued Mr.Floyd died from a heart attack due to low blood oxygen levels that was caused by the police restraint (knee on the neck).

The autopsy revealed normal blood oxygen levels (98%), therefore, the prosecutions theory of cause of death is proven false.

I have no support for Chauvin. His actions were disgusting. But according to the evidence, he did not cause Mr.Floyd’s death.

peace to you

There was no way that he would be getting a fair trial under those conditions!

 

[Reformed1689]

Sure there is a process to appeal.
There is an alleged juror issue, which the judge will look at. This is all standard procedure. It doesn't mean the case needs to be retried.
What is curious to me is why people desperately want Derek Chauvin to be innocent. It comes across as racist.

Quit throwing around the word racist, YOU are part of the problem when you do that!

 

[Aaron]

It comes across as racist.

So?