New Law Bans Demonstrations at Funerals

He is a coward if he greedily strikes a person that is morning the loss of a family member with a fist or with evil words.

A coward. A coward that has more in common with the Muslim terrorists that murder during a funeral than he or she has in common with a Christian.

Do we let cowards reign or freedom?

I vote for freedom to tell a coward to his or her face: "You are a yellow bellied coward."

 

That’s simply inconsistent.

You are welcome to keep defending it. It is irrelevant to this discussion, and is self-attesting. It doesn’t need our defense. It needs our proclamation.

And for years, the Constitution has been ruled to permit such things as this. So clearly, the constitution is not on your side, according to those to whom the Constitution is entrusted.

yes, but all communication requires interpretation. That is a basic axiom of communication.

Nope, We have the power to vote. We elect people to represent us in government.

The rulings of the land are a separate issue. I preach against abortion, not Roe. I don’t preach about Kelo because it has nothing to do with Scripture. But that really isn’t the point. In our constitutional republic, the courts are the arbiters of what is constitutional. They have, pretty consistently, ruled that certain speech can be prohibited.

That’s great. It’s not enough to determine whether or not one is a Christian, since Satan would confess that Jesus Christ came in the flesh.

You don’t get to decide the “proper application.” The constitution does not afford you that authority.

That’s just bad judgment on your part.

And this law doesn’t seem to infringe on those rights. He can still say it.

 

Disagree.

The word of God doesn't need anything however, we are called to defend it especially when it is under attack. It is relevant to this discussion as you asked me what two documents I defend, it is one of the two the constitution being the other.

For years Roe V Wade has been in play. It doesn't mean that the constitution is not on our side it just means their are justices that have perverted the Constitution.

Yes we do and the process by which we elect representatives is broken and the justices of the supreme court for decades have been spinning the constitution on end.

You don't preach against the ruling that brought us the deaths of 40 million children? Remarkable.

The principles of property have everything to do with scripture and certainly have much to do with liberty.

"The liberty of the press, trial by jury, the Habeas Corpus writ, even Magna Charta itself, although justly deemed the palladia of freedom, are all inferior considerations, when compared with a general distribution of real property among every class of people. The power of entailing estates is more dangerous to liberty and republican government than all the constitutions that can be written on paper, or even than a standing army. Let the people have property and they will have power." - Noah Webster​

"The American clergy had for one hundred years prior to the American Revolution preached on the subject of property--its Biblical basis and responsibility." - (Source: Noah Webster Founding Father of American Scholarship and Education)​

Today American clergy say property has nothing to do with scripture. Complete madness.

The property statement can only be surpassed in outlandishness by this one. You are suggesting that Satan has the spirit of God?

"Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:" - 1 John 4:2​

I have no more authority then that which is granted as a citizen. I have a grievance and I am exercising my right to express it while I still can.

Ah so now you're defending your Calvinist brother eh?

He sure can. Only his right of where he can say it and when, has been abridged by a law drafted by congress.

The last word is yours. I'm done with this thread.

 

Closed per previous warning. LE