The point was missed.
The topic was about my own opposition to the NIV, based upon the fact that some translators have willfully changed the meaning of key verses which have made either God or Jesus less than what They are. This isn't about what's Greek or not Greek. Read the last chapter in Revelation. Mankind is NOT AUTHORIZED to add to, or delete from, the Bible. It is that simple. And it isn't just the NIV. Here's a sample of other versions, specifically John 3:16:
(Analitical-Literal Translation) "For God so loved the world that He gave His only-begotten [or, unique] Son, so that every [one] believing [or, trusting] in Him shall not perish, _but_ shall be having eternal life! (Similar to KJV, but with obvious, side-tracking additions)
(American Standard Version) For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth on him should not perish, but have eternal life. (similar to the KJV)
(Bibie in Basic English) For God had such love for the world that he gave his only Son, so that whoever has faith in him may not come to destruction but have eternal life. (perish and destruction have different meanings)
(Contemporary English Version) God loved the people of this world so much that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who has faith in him will have eternal life and never really die. (Never really die? Doesn't say if he maybe really has eternal life, but that's something else)
(Darby) For God so loved the world, that he gave his only-begotten Son, that whosoever believes on him may not perish, but have life eternal. (Last two words flip-flopped that leaves the average reader guessing.)
(Douay-Rheims Bible) For God so loved the world, as to give his only begotten Son: that whosoever believeth in him may not perish, but may have life everlasting. (One could assume that 'may' means 'maybe'...it's like God saying "you follow me, and maybe I'll give you life. It falls short!)
(English Majority Text Version) For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. (Similar to KJV)
(Geneva Bible) For God so loued the worlde, that hee hath giuen his onely begotten Sonne, that whosoeuer beleeueth in him, should not perish, but haue euerlasting life. (Similar to KJV)
(International Standard Version) "For this is how God loved the world: He gave his unique Son so that everyone who believes in him might not perish but have eternal life. (If Joe believed in Him, he 'might not' perish? How about 'might not' live?)
(The Message) "This is how much God loved the world: He gave his Son, his one and only Son. And this is why: so that no one need be destroyed; by believing in him, anyone can have a whole and lasting life. (God gave mankind an average of 70 years to have a 'whole and lasting life'. The end of this verse says NOTHING about ETERNAL life!)
(Revised Standard Version) For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. (Similar to KJV)
As far as the New King James Version, just what in God's name is a Satanic/occultic/pagan symbol doing on the cover? Gracing the front with false virtue?
As for Pastor Larry, an increase in knowledge being beneficial to the world does not mean an increase in common sense. Common sense says to avoid tampering with God's word, as well as avoiding inflating what man can do. This is what you wrote concerning NASA:
"Now, NASA has sent probes to the outer reaches of our solar system. They send people to the upper atmosphere on a regular basis. They have reusable space shuttles. So my point stands. Increase in knowledge has brought much to this world".
One would infer that humanity is so vastly superior to anything from that statement. Well, guess what...and this is just NASA...
Bad wiring caused a fire on Apollo 1, killing three.
The shuttle Challenger exploded because of a simple O-ring failure, killing seven.
The shuttle Columbia burned up on re-entry because foam damaged a wing, killing seven.
The Solar Max and Mars Explorer satellites turned out to be duds.
The Hubble Space Telescope needed glasses to see...literaly!
Kind of in league with the guy who said that God Himself couldn't sink the Titanic, isn't it?