• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

No Mass Shootings in Australia in 20 Years: How Did They Do It?

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The FBI said they said they hadn't [yet] found "CONCRETE" evidence of specific homosexual partners or that Omar Mateen used homosexual dating apps. They didn't deny, nor cast doubt, that he was a long-time regular of the gay bar. And, I wouldn't expect modern the FBI to make much effort to follow this line of evidence. There is a cloud of witnesses that show that beyond a reasonable doubt that Mateen was a homosexual.

It was either gay-on-gay revenge (as explained by a man claiming to have been one of Mateen's homosexual partners, or maybe just because one rejection too many) or it was terrorism but with Mateen choosing his target not out of homophobia, but out of familiarity with the soft target. Evangelicals are supporting an unlikely narrative of homophobia and they are throwing moral values under the bus, to score anti-Islam points.

With all due respect, I do not understand what you are saying. I think that you have a typo with "modern" as I miss that meaning. Furthermore, the Democrats who are saying that the murderer was homosexual do not have any evidence to prove it. The murderer was constantly posting and calling that this was a Ramadan jihad, which gets extra points from Allah, and the murdered were those who are sentenced to death under Shariah law. I am thinking that the murderer was a Salafi Muslim. Islam uses capital punishment for the slightest pretenses. The Muslim threat is real and widespread in this country and we have the Muslim Brotherhood in all levels of government and the Muslim Brotherhood is giving money to Hamas and Hezbollah. Part of zakat goes to jihad. Huma Abedin is a Muslim Sister, I believe.

The leftist-Islamic alliance is showing growing pains. The red leftists and the green Islamists, green being the symbol for universal rule by the demonic Islam.
 

Smyth

Active Member
the Democrats who are saying that the murderer was homosexual do not have any evidence to prove it. The murderer was constantly posting and calling that this was a Ramadan jihad, which gets extra points from Allah, and the murdered were those who are sentenced to death under Shariah law.

How can you know so much about what he was posting while at the same time claiming there's no evidence he's a homosexual (the evidence is overwhelming)?
 
Last edited:

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How can you know so much about what he was posting while at the same time claiming there's no evidence he's a homosexual (the evidence is overwhelming)?

His jihadist actions on Facebook, etc., were reported in the news. I posted above a list of other jihadist attacks during this year's Ramadan--Ramadan is always a time of terror attacks. The Obama/Clinton FBI do not support your thesis.
 

Smyth

Active Member
His jihadist actions on Facebook, etc., were reported in the news. I posted above a list of other jihadist attacks during this year's Ramadan--Ramadan is always a time of terror attacks. The Obama/Clinton FBI do not support your thesis.

1) A gay-on-gay revenge scenario does not preclude Omar Mateen presenting his attack as an act of terrorism, as if there was something noble about it.

2) Even as an act of terrorism, he would have picked the club based on his familiarity with it, as a long-time patron.

3) It's weak to defend your position by the authority of Obama/Clinton FBI, which anyway has only really said they don't have concrete proof of gay lovers.

4) Evangelicals are shameless for agreeing with Democrats that this was an act of "homophobia".

5) Evangelicals are shameless for using "homophobia" as a weapon to attack Islam.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
1) A gay-on-gay revenge scenario does not preclude Omar Mateen presenting his attack as an act of terrorism, as if there was something noble about it.

2) Even as an act of terrorism, he would have picked the club based on his familiarity with it, as a long-time patron.

3) It's weak to defend your position by the authority of Obama/Clinton FBI, which anyway has only really said they don't have concrete proof of gay lovers.

4) Evangelicals are shameless for agreeing with Democrats that this was an act of "homophobia".

5) Evangelicals are shameless for using "homophobia" as a weapon to attack Islam.

1) Allah rewards those who make attacks during Ramadan and Islam calls for capital punishment for s0d0my.

2) I myself have no proof that he cased the club beforehand. I am not sure that the federal government has closed the investigation.

3) The Obama/Clinton FBI said that the people claiming to have been same-sex participants with the Muslim terrorists were lying.

4) I do not know what Evangelicals are thinking or saying in this instance. S0d0mites are the ones saying that it was revulsion and they are 100% Democrat. The Obama/Clinton FBI suggests that it was a terror attack--bad news for Democrats who are lax on national security and pro-Islam just as s0d0mites are anti-Christian.

5) To say that Islam does not put s0d0mites to death on a regular basis is to ignore current events and Islamic scripture. Some 350 people worldwide were murdered by Islam during 2016 Ramadan.
The split is within the red-green alliance, that is between political leftists and Islam and the political leftists have abandoned s0d0mites to Islam in this instance. S0d0mites are trying to cover up by saying that the left has not abandoned them in this instance and by saying that Islam loves them.
 
Top