I was thinking too narrowly....
I am writing it down in my little book that Crabtownboy wants to take away by God-given right to own a weapon to defend my family and my property.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I was thinking too narrowly....
The FBI said they said they hadn't [yet] found "CONCRETE" evidence of specific homosexual partners or that Omar Mateen used homosexual dating apps. They didn't deny, nor cast doubt, that he was a long-time regular of the gay bar. And, I wouldn't expect modern the FBI to make much effort to follow this line of evidence. There is a cloud of witnesses that show that beyond a reasonable doubt that Mateen was a homosexual.
It was either gay-on-gay revenge (as explained by a man claiming to have been one of Mateen's homosexual partners, or maybe just because one rejection too many) or it was terrorism but with Mateen choosing his target not out of homophobia, but out of familiarity with the soft target. Evangelicals are supporting an unlikely narrative of homophobia and they are throwing moral values under the bus, to score anti-Islam points.
Well, now Matt Damon is saying he wants a ban on guns in America, too....
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/5/matt-damon-jason-bourne-star-calls-for-us-to-ban-g/
the Democrats who are saying that the murderer was homosexual do not have any evidence to prove it. The murderer was constantly posting and calling that this was a Ramadan jihad, which gets extra points from Allah, and the murdered were those who are sentenced to death under Shariah law.
How can you know so much about what he was posting while at the same time claiming there's no evidence he's a homosexual (the evidence is overwhelming)?
His jihadist actions on Facebook, etc., were reported in the news. I posted above a list of other jihadist attacks during this year's Ramadan--Ramadan is always a time of terror attacks. The Obama/Clinton FBI do not support your thesis.
1) A gay-on-gay revenge scenario does not preclude Omar Mateen presenting his attack as an act of terrorism, as if there was something noble about it.
2) Even as an act of terrorism, he would have picked the club based on his familiarity with it, as a long-time patron.
3) It's weak to defend your position by the authority of Obama/Clinton FBI, which anyway has only really said they don't have concrete proof of gay lovers.
4) Evangelicals are shameless for agreeing with Democrats that this was an act of "homophobia".
5) Evangelicals are shameless for using "homophobia" as a weapon to attack Islam.