• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Non-cals have the same problem

Status
Not open for further replies.

Herald

New Member
I do not know how many realize it, must most posters lose interest or attention of novel sized posts well before the end.

SN, I know I do. Even if it's a poster I agree with theologically, I avoid reading their long posts. If you can't say it in one or two paragraphs it's best left unsaid IMHO.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
My motto is, "Disagreement without malice."

Well, how gracious of you :laugh:

Mine comes from my Italian mother..... "You go to your church & I will go to mine!"

side-note: you would not ever want to argue that point with anyone on that side of the family:smilewinkgrin:
 

Winman

Active Member
Hi Winman, I am sorry but this is yet another case where you and I differ as to what scripture teaches.

In my view a person can profess faith, like the second soil of Matthew 13, but that faith can be rootless, and therefore God will not credit it as righteousness.

People can say Lord and Lord and do work of ministry, yet on that day Christ will say I never knew you, indicating God did not credit their hypocritical faith as righteousness.

If you take a look at John 6:37, the idea is not to come to a profession of faith, because all that are given arrive in Christ, thus they will not be cast out. So to be given means to be put in Christ, by God, not for you or me to profess faith in Christ.

Saving faith is faith God credits as righteousness, our faith cannot be righteous of itself, because our works of righteousness are as filthy rags. It is God who turns the pig's ear of our faith, into the silk purse of righteousness.

Paul taught we must examine ourselves to see if we are of the faith? If by professing faith, no matter how flawed, brought salvation, then salvation would depend upon the man that wills, rather than on God who has mercy, Romans 16:9.

The folks of Matthew 7:21-23 had "called" on the name of the Lord, saying "Lord, Lord" yet were not saved. Therefore it is God who decides whether your call is actually a "call" in His sovereign judgment.

If we look not at Romans 10:11 (typo) but at Joel 2:32, Acts 2:21, Romans 10:13 and 1 Corinthians 1:2 we find the phrase and the promise. Your stumbling stone is thinking salvation is automatic for anyone who professes faith, as if God was bound by His promise to save anyone who professes faith. No, he knows who believes and He only keeps His covenant of love with those who believe from the heart and forsake the treasures (things or relationships) of this world. He credits our faith or not. That way it does not depend on the man that wills. Yes I know that means classic Arminianism is wrong. Scripture is scripture. Romans 4:4-5;24.

If your view is correct, then no man can KNOW he is saved, yet the scriptures clearly teach man can know for a certainty he is saved.

1 Jhn 5:13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.

If your view was correct (it isn't) then no man could know for a certainty he is saved, the best he could do is hope he is saved.

That is not what scriptures teach, the scriptures teach that any man who has believed on Jesus can absolutely KNOW he is saved.

Again, the reason those in Matthew 7 are not saved is shown, these persons were trusting that they were saved because they claimed Jesus as their "Lord" and boasted of their obedience and good works. This is nothing but Lordship Salvation plain and simple. The Pharisee was guilty of the same thing, he sincerely believed in God, he was no atheist, but he depended or trusted on his own righteousness and good works.

The publican demonstrated true saving faith, he did not boast of any goodness or good works, but confessed he was a sinner and cast himself completely on God's mercy, depending only on God and his goodness to be saved. And Jesus said this man went down to his house justified.

When God makes a promise, he keeps it, anyone who believes on Jesus and trusts him alone to save them from their sins is absolutely and certainly saved.
 

Inspector Javert

Active Member
So you're saying that God does not love those He has foreordained to death?
:laugh:He does not...not in any meaningful way shape or form. Given Calvinism God absolutely does not "love" those foreordained to death. Intelligent and consistent Calvinists such as Pink and Hoeksema (and others) already know this. It's obvious. Only a purely DELUSIONAL form of Calvinism would insist that he does.
That's not what the Confession says.
The moment "The Confession" is meaningful............we'll all forego our status as Baptists and become Catholics.
Nor is it what the Bible teaches.
The Bible clearly teaches that God DOES love those who perish......which is one of the myriad of areas wherein Calvinist Theology fails miserably. Consistent Calvinism (which few are guilty of on B.B.) doesn't demonstrate anything even vaguely akin to a "loving" God (to the damned) at all.

Whatever definition of "love" you submit which God possesses for the damned....I'm pretty sure that I have no interest in experiencing it. :laugh:
Do YOU wish to be the fortunate recipient of the "LOVE" God has for the damned? :laugh:

I thank God daily that my wife has successfully un-shackled herself from Calvinism, because if she "loved" me in the same way that God "loves" the damned in the Calvinist schema....then, no thanks, I'll pass on that kind of love any day.
What a joke.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

saturneptune

New Member
God is my refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. The Holy Spirit in me testifies I am a child of the Living God. The inner workings of the Lord that got me here are up to Him. I am charged with telling others about the glorious Gospel to the best of my ability.
 

Winman

Active Member
InsJ said:
Whatever definition of "love" you submit which God possesses for the damned....I'm pretty sure that I have no interest in experiencing it.
Do YOU wish to be the fortunate recipient of the "LOVE" God has for the damned?

Reminds me of Cool Hand Luke when the warden beat Luke over the head with a club and Luke fell into the ditch. All the other inmates gaped at the warden in total awe of his cruelty.

The warden saw their looks and said, "You don't understand, I'm just tryin' to help ya, I'm just tryin' to help ya get your minds right".

Luke stands up rubbing his head and says, "I wish you didn't care so much about me boss." :laugh:
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If your view is correct, then no man can KNOW he is saved, yet the scriptures clearly teach man can know for a certainty he is saved.
Paul taught we are to examine ourselves to see if we are of the faith. You think he got it wrong, we know because we professed? Not how scripture reads.

Again we know we are saved by our changed life, we see the fruit of the Spirit.

Your argument carries the seeds of its own defeat, if some professed the name of Jesus and were not saved, then salvation is not automatic by professing, but rather depends on God crediting that faith as righteousness. If He does not, no salvation.

God keeps His promise, we just disagree on what is promised, automatic salvation as determined by man believing the right things in the right way, or by God having mercy upon whom He has mercy. You view makes salvation depend on the man that will....
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Winman

Active Member
Paul taught we are examine ourselves to see if we are of the faith. You think he got it wrong, we know because we professed? Not how scripture reads.

Again we know we are saved by our changed life, we see the fruit of the Spirit.

Your argument carries the seeds of its own defeat, if some professed the name of Jesus and were not saved, then salvation is not automatic by professing, but rather depends on God crediting that faith as righteousness. If He does not, no salvation.

God keeps His promise, we just disagree on what is promised, automatic salvation as determined by man believing the right things in the right way, or by God having mercy upon whom He has mercy. You view makes salvation depend on the man that will....

Simply professing you believe in God is not the same as trusting Jesus for salvation. Those in Matthew 7 were not atheists, they believed Jesus was Lord, but they trusted in their works to save them, it is shown in the text, they boasted of their works.

Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

The reason they are not saved is shown, they trusted that they called Jesus "Lord, Lord", they trusted they had prophesied in his name, cast out devils in his name, and done many wonderful WORKS in his name. This is nothing but Lordship salvation.

The Pharisee was exactly the same;

Luk 18:11 The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican.
12 I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess.

The Pharisee was no atheist, he truly believed in God, but he trusted in his own righteous works to save him. He boasted he was not a sinner as other men are, and he boasted of his religious works.

The publican made no such claims, he simply confessed he was a sinner and cast himself completely on God's mercy.

Luk 18:13 And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.
14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.

There is a difference in simply believing there is a God and trusting Jesus to save you. The devils believe and tremble. They cannot trust Jesus because there is no promise to them.

To be saved you must believe Jesus's specific promise to save you if you trust him, and him alone to save you. Anyone who does this can know for an absolute certainty they are saved.

1 Jhn 5:13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Hi Winman, I see you simply repeated your argument for automatic salvation if you believe in the right way all the right things. Thus you make salvation depend on the man that wills.

But you agree that God determines whether the profession meets his standard for giving mercy. And if it does not, no salvation, i.e. Matthew 7.

Thus you agree that if God credits your faith as righteousness, He saves you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
:laugh:He does not...not in any meaningful way shape or form. Given Calvinism God absolutely does not "love" those foreordained to death. Intelligent and consistent Calvinists such as Pink and Hoeksema (and others) already know this. It's obvious. Only a purely DELUSIONAL form of Calvinism would insist that he does.

The moment "The Confession" is meaningful............we'll all forego our status as Baptists and become Catholics.

The Bible clearly teaches that God DOES love those who perish......which is one of the myriad of areas wherein Calvinist Theology fails miserably. Consistent Calvinism (which few are guilty of on B.B.) doesn't demonstrate anything even vaguely akin to a "loving" God (to the damned) at all.

Whatever definition of "love" you submit which God possesses for the damned....I'm pretty sure that I have no interest in experiencing it. :laugh:
Do YOU wish to be the fortunate recipient of the "LOVE" God has for the damned? :laugh:

I thank God daily that my wife has successfully un-shackled herself from Calvinism, because if she "loved" me in the same way that God "loves" the damned in the Calvinist schema....then, no thanks, I'll pass on that kind of love any day.
What a joke.

So you feel that giving irresponsible sinful people a choice in the matter of their eternal salvation is the responsible & prudent thing to do?

& then why are you making analogies about your wifes worldly feelings to Gods Divine Ways....sorry but the two are incompatible. Whether you are conscious of this or not, you are comparing human characteristics to God characteristics. Do you truly believe they are the same?
 

RIPP0NWV

New Member
Inspector Javert said:
:laugh:He does not...not in any meaningful way shape or form. Given Calvinism God absolutely does not "love" those foreordained to death. Intelligent and consistent Calvinists such as Pink and Hoeksema (and others) already know this. It's obvious. Only a purely DELUSIONAL form of Calvinism would insist that he does.

What a joke.

Maybe the joke is on you. How is believing that God is sovereign DELUSIONAL?? How much time have you put into studying this doctrine?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mexdeaf

New Member
:laugh:He does not...not in any meaningful way shape or form. Given Calvinism God absolutely does not "love" those foreordained to death. Intelligent and consistent Calvinists such as Pink and Hoeksema (and others) already know this. It's obvious. Only a purely DELUSIONAL form of Calvinism would insist that he does.


Whatever definition of "love" you submit which God possesses for the damned....I'm pretty sure that I have no interest in experiencing it. :laugh:
Do YOU wish to be the fortunate recipient of the "LOVE" God has for the damned?

It seems from my reading that Reformed theologians are not all agreed on the matter.

Calvin himself said:

16. For God so loved the world. Christ opens up the first cause, and, as it were, the source of our salvation, and he does so, that no doubt may remain; for our minds cannot find calm repose, until we arrive at the unmerited love of God. As the whole matter of our salvation must not be sought any where else than in Christ, so we must see whence Christ came to us, and why he was offered to be our Savior. Both points are distinctly stated to us: namely, that faith in Christ brings life to all, and that Christ brought life, because the Heavenly Father loves the human race, and wishes that they should not perish. And this order ought to be carefully observed; for such is the wicked ambition which belongs to our nature, that when the question relates to the origin of our salvation, we quickly form diabolical imaginations about our own merits. Accordingly, we imagine that God is reconciled to us, because he has reckoned us worthy that he should look upon us. But Scripture everywhere extols his pure and unmingled mercy, which sets aside all merits. (John Calvin, Calvin's Commentaries Jn 3:16)

I guess it really comes down to how one defines "love". Some would say that God does show His love by his daily mercies to the lost.
 

Winman

Active Member
Hi Winman, I see were you simply repeated your argument for automatic salvation is you believe in the right way all the right things. Thus you make salvation depend on the man that wills.

But you agree that God determines whether the profession meets his standard for giving mercy. And if it does not, no salvation.

Thus you agree that if God credits your faith as righteousness, He saves you.

I certainly agree that it is God who decides who is saved, that is shown in the scripture I quoted. Those who trusted in their works were not saved, those who trusted in Jesus alone to save them were.

This is exactly what Paul says in Romans 10:

Rom 10:1 Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.
2 For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.
3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

Paul's fellow countrymen believed in God, they were not atheists, Paul said they had a zeal of God, "but not according to knowledge".

The trouble was that they were trying to earn salvation by keeping the law, they were trusting in their own righteousness instead of trusting completely on Jesus and the work he did to save them.

Rom 9:30 What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith.
31 But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.
32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;

Here Paul explains why the Gentiles are saved, because they simply trusted on Jesus to save them by faith. The Jews were not saved because they tried to merit salvation by their works.

And yes, what I am describing is often called "easy believism", that if you sincerely trust Jesus to save you he will. You are saved right then and there, you do not have to "persevere" to the end to be saved.

1 Jhn 3:2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

If your view is correct (it isn't) then no man could say with a certainty that NOW he is a son of God, but that is exactly what John taught.

You are correct though, we are told to examine ourselves to see whether we are in the faith, that is, we should make sure we are trusting on Jesus alone to save us, and not depending on our works, church membership, being born into a Christian family, or any other reason to be saved.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Inspector Javert

Active Member
I stirred up a bee-hive with my last post, so I'll take this one statement and one poster at a time:
So you feel that giving irresponsible sinful people a choice in the matter of their eternal salvation is the responsible & prudent thing to do?
No. I think it was quite the opposite....who said anything about it being "responsible" or "prudent"?
Quite frankly E.W.F. when it comes to God and his love of mankind....I think he was absolutely RECKLESS, FOOLISH, IMPRUDENT and BLIND....and he threw caution to the wind and gave EVERYTHING....his dignity, his life, his blood, to hang beaten and naked and tortured because he was a "love-sick" fool. That was HIS decision, not mine. I was the OBJECT of his "love-sick" tom-foolery and I was never worth, and (In my opinion) never will be. But, HE seems to think I am. That is his problem not mine, I am merely the fortunate recipient of his poor decision-making.

If God had a wise father E.W.F.....he would have told him to be "responsible" and "prudent" and that the object of his affections (namely you and me) weren't worth it, and that he should find a more respectable BRIDE or, at least, a bride who wouldn't fool around on him and fornicate with idols.

God wasn't "prudent" in the least. He was a love-sick fool who made a sacrifice of himself on this Earth in order to redeem a worthless sin-sick whore who didn't care a fig about him and make her his BRIDE. He did so, because he (pay attention to this word):
LOVED her!
& then why are you making analogies about your wifes worldly feelings to Gods Divine Ways....
For the same reason anyone makes analogies, it's to illustrate a point. Not to prove it.
sorry but the two are incompatible.
They are absolutely NOT "incompatible". All analogies are imperfect, of course, but God made something of a habit of analogizing his love for mankind in reference to a man and his bride.........so, I am pretty sure I am not going off the deep end to follow the practice.
Whether you are conscious of this or not, you are comparing human characteristics to God characteristics
.
I am very conscious of it. And ........wait for it...........I am doing it quite intentionally. I am doing it on purpose.
More accurately, I am comparing human characteristics TO Divine characteristics (not the other way around) as you put it. We were created in God's image............There happens to be a WHOLE LOT about God and his tendencies, desires emotions and drives which we share in common with him.
Do you truly believe they are the same?
No, but they are quite similar (see doctrine of Imago Dei).......and if ANY analogy on planet Earth is more Biblically warranted....it's an analogy between a Bridegroom and his Bride.

That's why I used the analogy. In fact, there's an entire BOOK dedicated solely to that VERY analogy just recently mentioned: The Song of Solomon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

saturneptune

New Member
If God had a wise father E.W.F.....he would have told him to be "responsible" and "prudent" and that the object of his affections (namely you and me) weren't worth it, and that he should find a more respectable BRIDE or, at least, a bride who wouldn't fool around on him and fornicate with idols.

God wasn't "prudent" in the least. He was a love-sick fool who made a sacrifice of himself on this Earth in order to redeem a worthless sin-sick whore who didn't care a fig about him and make her his BRIDE. He did so, because he (pay attention to this word):
LOVED her!

God is not a love sick fool. He is Creator, Savior, and makes the rules. I will ask what another poster did, how much time have you spent studying the sovereignty of God?
 

Dr. Bob

Administrator
Administrator
That low representation of God sickens me. Who would post it?

"God is RECKLESS, FOOLISH, IMPRUDENT and BLIND . . was a "love-sick" fool. That was HIS decision, not mine. I was the OBJECT of his "love-sick" tom-foolery"

No place for any such vile post on a Christian forum. That is so sad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top