I believe it was NT Wright that said in a book that Heaven will not be some space in the universe but will be the here and now and earth. So when we die we will wake up on the earth, but in paradise. What do you think of this?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I think NT is wright .I believe it was NT Wright that said in a book that Heaven will not be some space in the universe but will be the here and now and earth. So when we die we will wake up on the earth, but in paradise. What do you think of this?
Wright teaches (as do I) that heaven and earth will be unified in the end. The image of New Jerusalem descending from the heavens in Revelation is a picture of this completed unification.I believe it was NT Wright that said in a book that Heaven will not be some space in the universe but will be the here and now and earth. So when we die we will wake up on the earth, but in paradise. What do you think of this?
I haven't read Wright on this topic, but I do rely upon the Scriptures.
The Revelation clearly states that THIS heaven and THIS earth pass away in a fiery demise.
There is a NEW heaven and a NEW earth, given for all eternity. Everything is new - EVEN the lake of fire, for both death and hell are cast into that eternal place.
The new heaven and earth have yet to be disclosed, but are being prepared, just as Christ stated.
There is no attraction to this earth, nor to the current heavens for me. I long for a new place. A place that the enemies of God have never set their foot upon, have never seen with their perverted eyes, have never breathed of the purity and have not been moistened by the stream.
No, if that thinking comes from Wright, then that thinking is wrong, and specifically not found supported in Scriptures. It is not only wrong, but heretically wrong. For it denies the very bold and clear statements of Scriptures.
I haven't read Wright on this topic, but I do rely upon the Scriptures.
The Revelation clearly states that THIS heaven and THIS earth pass away in a fiery demise.
Funny that the OP question was what do you think, rather than what does scripture say.
is that different from what NT Wright teaches on Heaven?At death we enter into the present 3rd heaven to be with the Lord. After the return of Christ and the Great White Seat judgment this earth and heaven will pass away and a new heaven and earth will be created wherein is no sin or the consequences of sin as you have rightly said. And, yes, on that new earth the new Jerusalem will "come down" out of the new heavens and sit upon a new earth without oceans.
BTW, Evan, there is a bit of disagreement regarding NT Wright. While many (including myself) don't find everything he holds to be true (Wright being Anglican and I being Baptist makes that a bit obvious ), some almost lean towards espousing nothing he holds as holding benefit to the Church. Others reject some doctrines (most notably, his view of Justification) while recognizing his contributions in other areas. Piper, for example, wrote a book countering Wright's view of justification while praising both his scholarship and contributions to the Church (The Future of Justification). It is also interesting that some (including Piper) who argue that Wright's position is confusing and perhaps incomplete as a doctrine also stop short of declaring what he has actually concluded as false.I believe it was NT Wright that said in a book that Heaven will not be some space in the universe but will be the here and now and earth. So when we die we will wake up on the earth, but in paradise. What do you think of this?
Such is not consistent with the limited Scriptures given and not consistent with that scene presently in which believers abide.The heaven in that verse is referring to the upper atmosphere of the earth not the abode of God.
Funny that the OP question was what do you think, rather than what does scripture say. In context the heaven in view is the third heaven, the abode of God, a spiritual rather than physical realm. Anywhere God resides, within us or beyond creation is "heaven - the kingdom of God."
Scripture speaks of heaven (and heavens) three ways, heaven, the first heaven refers to the earth's atmosphere, where birds fly and clouds swirl. The second heaven refers to space where the moon, sun and stars hang out, and the third heaven, paradise refers to the abode of God. Right now, God the Father, God the Son, Angels, and the spirits of the saved are in heaven, even through the saved who are physically alive are also on earth.
Our job is not to worry about the New Heaven of end times, our job is to help save as many as we can right now, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.
Such is not consistent with the limited Scriptures given and not consistent with that scene presently in which believers abide.
The immediacy of the passing away of the heaven and earth is followed by the great throne judgement of God. There is only ONE place that the believers are ushered into after that time, that is the New heaven and earth, and the Scriptures are very specific about not only the conditions of that place by the Father and Son's presence in that place.
Nope, the current abode of God has been polluted by the enemy and accuser of the believers. The pictures given in the early passages of the Revelation of that place is one far removed from that scene given of the final estate.
"Behold, I make all things new" FOLLOWS the display of the new heaven and earth. Not given to be seen until then. God is in the "all things new" and that is clearly stated in the Scriptures.
The heaven and earth of Genesis 1:1-2 is NOT merely this world and the atmosphere of this world. It is also apparent by observation that the universe is not at peace any more than the earth is currently at rest. It is mere conjecture to consider that the very dwelling place of God was not impacted by Satanic influence.Your view is not consistent with what we know about God and this world is corrupted. Further, the word heaven is a regular word used to describe the atmosphere of the earth throughout scripture. It is this world the earth, the heavens and the seas that need renewing not the abode of God. That has never been corrupted.
The heaven and earth of Genesis 1:1-2 is NOT merely this world and the atmosphere of this world. It is also apparent by observation that the universe is not at peace any more than the earth is currently at rest. It is mere conjecture to consider that the very dwelling place of God was not impacted by Satanic influence.
is that different from what NT Wright teaches on Heaven?
BTW, Evan, there is a bit of disagreement regarding NT Wright. While many (including myself) don't find everything he holds to be true (Wright being Anglican and I being Baptist makes that a bit obvious ), some almost lean towards espousing nothing he holds as holding benefit to the Church. Others reject some doctrines (most notably, his view of Justification) while recognizing his contributions in other areas. Piper, for example, wrote a book countering Wright's view of justification while praising both his scholarship and contributions to the Church (The Future of Justification). It is also interesting that some (including Piper) who argue that Wright's position is confusing and perhaps incomplete as a doctrine also stop short of declaring what he has actually concluded as false.
I'd recommend picking up "Surprised by Hope" and reading it slowly alongside scripture. You may be surprised Biggrin.
This pretty much sums up my opinion:
http://kuyperian.com/reformed-people-read-n-t-wright/
C.ool, What did you think of it?Thanks but I was not talking about his view on Justification, but his view on heaven. I do have the book you mentioned.
He has it. He hasn't stated whether he's read it yet. He got it at my behest. I always told him that if he was unhappy with it, I'd buy it from him.C.ool, What did you think of it?