Number 666 explained

[David Lamb]

313, cac in english gematria, is code for drinking the blood of a sacrificed child. The etymology of cake means placenta which has veins that can look like a tree like the meaning of the tree of life. Hidden manna is consuming the light filled blood of a sacrificed child in a hidden way, not drinking it with your mouth or getting it through an IV.

The bible verse that says "as a dog returns to its vomit" refers to how people (e.g. dogs of psalm 68:23) would drink blood then vomit it because they couldn't stomach it then drink the vomited blood so they could get high. This is why Amelek are called "blood lickers."

None of that explains how you made six hundred, three score and six into 313.

 

[Dave G]

The number 666 is explained:

" And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 and that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number [is] Six hundred threescore [and] six." ( Revelation 13:16-18 ).

The number of a man, called "the beast", or Anti-Christ.
Should we as believers go beyond this?

No, my friends....it only leads to unnecessary speculation ( and worse ) and it certainly doesn't lead to mutual edification.

 

[David Lamb]

The number 666 is explained:

" And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 and that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number [is] Six hundred threescore [and] six." ( Revelation 13:16-18 ).

The number of a man, called "the beast", or Anti-Christ.
Should we as believers go beyond this?

No, my friends....it only leads to unnecessary speculation ( and worse ) and it certainly doesn't lead to mutual edification.

I am not sure whether you were replying to my post (Post 21), but if you were, I didn't meant that 666 is not explained. but that 666 is not the same as 313, as another poster had claimed.