"O" that that birth certificate!!!

[blackbird]

Suppose----just suppose

O finishes out his term and one of the Republicans wins the November election---be it Gingricht, Santorum, Romney---or whoever

And 6 months down the road someone uncovers damning evidence that will prove once and for all that O was NOT a US citizen

And that the evidence is taken to Congress---Congress takes a "Look/See" and concurs that yes indeed---he is not a citizen

What exactly could be done at that point?? Would they send him to Levensworth???

What would the law say proving O to be a fraud??

 

[matt wade]

Are we really going to do this one again?

 

[PamelaK]

Suppose----just suppose

O finishes out his term and one of the Republicans wins the November election---be it Gingricht, Santorum, Romney---or whoever

And 6 months down the road someone uncovers damning evidence that will prove once and for all that O was NOT a US citizen

And that the evidence is taken to Congress---Congress takes a "Look/See" and concurs that yes indeed---he is not a citizen

What exactly could be done at that point?? Would they send him to Levensworth???

What would the law say proving O to be a fraud??

Would every document he had signed be null and void? (I wasn't here for the first time around on this)

 

[preachinjesus]

Oy vey...get over it guys. The birther controversy is over and done with and is a terrible position for anyone to wrangle over.

You can't speculate over hypotheticals...especially ones so extreme and unrealistic. It's like asking: what if President Obama is found out to be an alien from outer space, will that undo his laws? Just foolishness.

 

[SolaSaint]

Even if this all played out, whoever was the sitting Prez would pardom him. It's the way it's done. Remember Nixon.

 

[carpro]

Would every document he had signed be null and void?

I believe every bill, act, or executive order he signed should have to be suspended and brought before a legally elected president for his signature.

 

[InTheLight]

What exactly could be done at that point??

Joseph! Mr. Farah! Wake up sir! You've been dreaming again.

 

[Mexdeaf]

Joseph! Mr. Farah! Wake up sir! You've been dreaming again.

LOL!!:thumbs::thumbsup:

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Even if this all played out, whoever was the sitting Prez would pardom him. It's the way it's done. Remember Nixon.

I would agree. Remember, despite the howling of the democrats that Bush was a criminal, Obama has not opened up any criminal investigation on him.

 

[menageriekeeper]

Nothing would be done because no one will uncover evidence that Obama knew he wassn't really a citizen. The coverup (not that I really believe there is one) would have been perpetrated by his mother/grandparents for their own purposes in gaining and keeping custody of him as a child. Obama will be seen as innocent of the whole affair.

Much ado about nothing folks. Even in the '60s good records were hard to come by. And who would have ever foreseen a mixed race "black" man as running for President in a mere 40 years? It wasn't even to be considered.

 

[carpro]

I would agree. Remember, despite the howling of the democrats that Bush was a criminal, Obama has not opened up any criminal investigation on him.

I get your point, but I believe in this instance, they just didn't have a case.

 

[saturneptune]

Suppose----just suppose

If a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his butt.

 

[FR7 Baptist]

I believe every bill, act, or executive order he signed should have to be suspended and brought before a legally elected president for his signature.

If this insane fantasy came true, it would have no bearing on the validity of Mr. Obama's actions as President. There is a procedure to challenge the validity of electoral votes, and that is when the Houses of Congress assemble and the votes are counted.

 

[righteousdude2]

Well Matt...

Are we really going to do this one again?

....like you tell me, you don't have to participate in this if you don't want. No one is holding a gun to your head to even get involved in this subject, so, now that you shared your opinion, find another place to roost and crow.

 

[matt wade]

....like you tell me, you don't have to participate in this if you don't want. No one is holding a gun to your head to even get involved in this subject, so, now that you shared your opinion, find another place to roost and crow.

You're a funny dude, Dude. I must have ruffled your feathers a couple of days ago and now you've been lying in wait for an opportunity to take a shot at me. It wasn't a very successful shot, but a shot none the less.

What you don't seem to understand, Prodigal Dude, is that there is a difference between me asking whether we are going to debate a subject again and you crying and whining that people dare engage you in debate. <PA deleted - LE>

 

[carpro]

If this insane fantasy came true, it would have no bearing on the validity of Mr. Obama's actions as President. There is a procedure to challenge the validity of electoral votes, and that is when the Houses of Congress assemble and the votes are counted.

You're guessing. No one really kows what would happen, but it obviously would have nothing to do with electoral votes.

 

[righteousdude2]

This is a debate forum....

You're a funny dude, Dude. I must have ruffled your feathers a couple of days ago and now you've been lying in wait for an opportunity to take a shot at me. It wasn't a very successful shot, but a shot none the less.

What you don't seem to understand, Prodigal Dude, is that there is a difference between me asking whether we are going to debate a subject again and you crying and whining that people dare engage you in debate. <PA deleted - LE>

....not a slander forum. Your continued attempts to put me down only point to your lack of Christian civility. In fact, I shouldn't even use the word Christian before civility, because Christian would infer that you have the heart of Christ, and this comment lacks anything that resembles the heart of Christ. Maybe the heart of flesh? Maybe the heart of hate? Maybe the heart of a [foul language and personal insult deleted] ?

[questioning salvation deleted]

It could also be a simple thing like you have a personal vendetta against me (and others); again, not an example of someone who claims to be a follower of Jesus, but a follower of their own hate!

I can't help but wonder what the shepherd of the flock you are in would think of such cheap shots being taken at another beleiver?

[see above on questioning salvation]

May I suggest that you remain on track, and not try to make this great topic a running battle between you and I? In plain and simple words: Get back on topic!

 

[preachinjesus]

....not a slander forum. Your continued attempts to put me down only point to your lack of Christian civility. In fact, I shouldn't even use the word Christian before civility, because Christian would infer that you have the heart of Christ, and this comment lacks anything that resembles the heart of Christ. Maybe the heart of flesh? Maybe the heart of hate? Maybe the heart of a smart-ass?

Really? You're really going to chastise someone for being uncivil and use a curse word to get your point across? Really?

However, you definitely lack the heart of Christ and the ability to reflect Christ, when it comes to me (or others on this forum whom you've developed an ongoing repugnance for), because you have not had a genuine, born-again, relationship with Jesus?

It could also be a simple thing like you have a personal vendetta against me (and others); again, not an example of someone who claims to be a follower of Jesus, but a follower of their own hate!

I can't help but wonder what the shepherd of the flock you are in would think of such cheap shots being taken at another beleiver?

Check your heart at the door Matt, this is a Christian forum, and only Christians should be posting here! :wavey:

May I suggest that you remain on track, and not try to make this great topic a running battle between you and I? In plain and simple words: Get back on topic!

And then you question his salvation? Really? This is the mature way to respond?

 

[righteousdude2]

Blah, Blah..

Really? You're really going to chastise someone for being uncivil and use a curse word (Where is your self-righteous condemenation when others USE words far worse than this?) to get your point across? Really?



And then you question his salvation? Really? This is the mature way to respond?

...and more blah!

 

[matt wade]

May I suggest that you remain on track, and not try to make this great topic a running battle between you and I? In plain and simple words: Get back on topic!

Maybe you should review the order of posts on this thread, Dude Man. It was you, not I, that went off topic. It was you that came into this thread and started the argument with me. I know it's not fun when facts don't back up your statements, but I'm sure you're used to that.