• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Obama: Sermon on Mount Justifies Same-Sex Unions

Dragoon68

Active Member
dragonfly said:
Obama actually said, "As your President, I will use the bully pulpit to urge states to treat same-sex couples with full equality in their family and adoption laws."

This is somewhat different than dedicating the presidency to this issue.

This Catholic news site is somewhat over-dramatic.

Urging the states to provide "full equality in their family and adoption laws" can't be taken for anything other than a dedication to advancing the homosexual agenda.

What chance does an adopted child with same sex parents have to reject such a sinful union?
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So, in your world, everything does not mean everything. Now I understand. :rolleyes:

let me clear this up a bit. It is an honest mistake on your part.

Here is my original post you respoded to....

Originally Posted by steaver
And this means what? It is a non-issue. The issue is "have NOTHING to do with the unfruitful works of darkness". Do you reject this instruction from our Lord?

"Nothing" includes "Everything" .

You responded with....

Dragonfly......Are you positive that the man who owns the gas station you buy gas at is pro-life? How about the cooks or waitresses in the restaurants you frequent? You better check. After all, you said, "EVERYTHING," right?

Now if you take what I said...""Nothing" includes "Everything" ...you will see that is was a direct conclusion I made concerning the previous..."have NOTHING to do with the unfruitful works of darkness".

Now take what "Nothing" is reffering to in the scripture. It is "unfruitful works of darkness". This is why in my last post I capitalized "WORKS". I thought it would make my reference to "nothing means everything" most clear.

Now if you read my post again you would see that my "everything" is refering to all (or everything) that would aid with the actual "unfruitful WORK". Nothing more, nothing less. See some want to say that they are doing no wrong against this scripture because they are not doing the actual killing. But the scripture cannot be divided improperly that way. Thus my statement "Nothing means Everything".

This includes supporting the candidate which openly helps the unfruitful work to be done. It would not include buying food from cooks or gas from gas men. These type of people are just surviving by selling a product. They are not asking for my support or help to carry out their aggenda which in Obama's case includes murdering children in the wombs.

Its just like driving the get away car. The driver didn't do the actual robbery, but the driver did have something to do with the unfruitful work of darkness. Then maybe they drive to their cousin's house and they hide them. Now the cousin is in on the unfruitful work of darkness. It is the exact same for the voter who supports a pro-murder candidate, they are violating God's command to have NOTHING to do with the unfruitful works of darkness.

You cannot dismiss your invovlement in abortion just because you did not actually perform one. If you aided in any way through supporting those who have power to vote to keep it going then you are indeed aiding in the works of darkness and disobeying God's Word.

God Bless! :thumbs:
 

ajg1959

New Member
KenH said:
Are you questioning my salvation?
I know you didnt address your question to me, but if you had...

I in no way question anyones salvation, but I do wholeheartedly question your theology, and bliblical doctrine.

Your salvation is between you and God, but your doctrine, as you spread it, is available to all of us for "reproof", as the bible teaches.

As I said before, just because it "sounds good" doesnt make it biblically doctrinal.

AJ
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
LeBuick said:
You think his sermon on the mount comment was only repeating (summarizing) what his pastor said???

No I didn't find the sermon on the mount mentioned anywhere on the site. But I do believe it is where he got his theology from.
 
Top