• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Obama tells Medvedev he'll have 'more flexibility' after election

StefanM

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think it's just frank talk. Obama isn't going to have enough support to do anything prior to the election. In his second term, he will have more flexibility because he will not have to worry about re-election, but that doesn't mean anything sinister. It's just the way it works.
 

freeatlast

New Member
I think it's just frank talk. Obama isn't going to have enough support to do anything prior to the election. In his second term, he will have more flexibility because he will not have to worry about re-election, but that doesn't mean anything sinister. It's just the way it works.

:laugh::laugh::laugh: Yea right! It is that attitude and blindness as to why we are in this mess and it is going to get worse.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Wonder if there will be another chest beating "mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa" global trip to apologize for the shortcomings of the "previous" administration.

HankD
 

Borneol

New Member
I thought this a nice assessment of the open mic flap. The president would have done better for himself if he had made distance from the comments. It seems amateurish that he did not.

"White House Misplays Open-Mic Flap"

http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2012/03/28/white-house-misplays-open-mic-flap/

snippet:

...At this point, whatever the president’s post-November plans might be, Team Obama should have come out tough on Russia, reassuring the country that U.S. national interests were in safe hands and that the president wasn’t planning to give away the store. Instead, the White House press secretary announced “…it’s in the interest of the United States to work cooperatively with the Russians. And that’s what he’s going to do.” This makes it sound like Obama is indeed planning to make sweeping, politically unpalatable concessions to the Russians. The Romney camp must be thanking its lucky stars.
If Team Obama had instead come out with a hard line on Moscow, the Russians would most likely have understood; indeed, during his own presidential campaign, Putin came down very hard against the U.S. A similar strategy for Obama would have not have ruffled many feathers in Russia, and would have reduced the impact of the mike miscue as an issue.
That didn’t happen, and Team Obama has just made it significantly easier for the Republicans to run against Vladimir Putin and both his foreign and domestic policies. In American politics, that is the winning side of the issue. A hard hitting editorial in the Washington Post drives the point home; President Obama has tied himself to a shaky anti-American regime and the mike gaffe was an indicator of things to come.
 

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think it's just frank talk. Obama isn't going to have enough support to do anything prior to the election. In his second term, he will have more flexibility because he will not have to worry about re-election, but that doesn't mean anything sinister. It's just the way it works.

The zero knows that if enough voters put him back in office after seeing the results of his first term, then,with no re-election worries nor accountability (proven by getting re-elected) he can do pretty darn well as he pleases, and the gullible public will swallow ANY explanation with "pied-piper" eyes wide shut!!!!

4 more years of this yo-yo and the US of A will cease to be - we'll then be just one more 3rd rate, poverty stricken country, like most of those in Africa today.

Then all the ZERO worshipers will be yelling "Wha hoppen???"; but, too little, too late.:BangHead::BangHead:
 
Top