• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Obama's World: Black Mob Attacks Whites at State Fair in Wisconsin

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
:thumbsup:

Truth be told, I did see by following links from the OP link that there was an earlier demonstration against the governor at the fair. The people in that demonstration appeared to be white, but from one person I have spoken to who lives in Wisconsin (plus stuff on the internet), a lot of people really don’t like him. Of course, this is where the whole labor showdown occurred, you may recall. So I could see it being connected somehow.

It bears a resemblance to what happened in Iowa, and as far as all the information that came out, the claims of shouted racial motivations came from the Aryan Nation. Likewise, we see these claims by individuals, and the site suggesting this was the result of a black president.
As for people being told all their problems are someone else's fault, and then lashing back at them; this can go both ways, and clearly, blame has been much louder in the other direction, with "welfare" still blamed for much of the economy's troubles (and now, unions), and much moreso than anything said or inspired by Sharpton and Jackson, who have largely fallen to the sidelines.

(Wow; haven't seen Frogman in a while!)

What we have here are just a couple of red herrings to deflect attention from the racially motivated rioting of some black thugs.

Ever the racial apologist...at least for black people.

Pitiful.
 

targus

New Member
:thumbsup:

Truth be told, I did see by following links from the OP link that there was an earlier demonstration against the governor at the fair. The people in that demonstration appeared to be white, but from one person I have spoken to who lives in Wisconsin (plus stuff on the internet), a lot of people really don’t like him. Of course, this is where the whole labor showdown occurred, you may recall. So I could see it being connected somehow.

So you think that perhaps Blacks were attacking Whites as a demonstration against the Governor?

It bears a resemblance to what happened in Iowa, and as far as all the information that came out, the claims of shouted racial motivations came from the Aryan Nation. Likewise, we see these claims by individuals, and the site suggesting this was the result of a black president.

So you think that the videos of the assaults are just "claims by individuals"?
 

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It's amazing to see the blatant racial stereotypes and accusations that fly on boards like this.

Maybe amazing isn't the proper word, perhaps sad is better. The groundless accusations of the OP, and subsequent replies, are stunning. If you're going to make an accusation like this you need to show supporting data. A random story posting on a news tabliod like Drudge isn't going to get you far in attempting to attach it to the current President.
 

Eric B

Active Member
Site Supporter
What we have here are just a couple of red herrings to deflect attention from the racially motivated rioting of some black thugs.

Ever the racial apologist...at least for black people.

Pitiful.

So you think that perhaps Blacks were attacking Whites as a demonstration against the Governor?

So you think that the videos of the assaults are just "claims by individuals"?
No, that a specific racial motivation was a claim by individuals, not the rioting itself just like in Iowa some time ago, which turned out to be bogus.

Of course, it's wrong for one group to have an apologist, yet perfectly OK for the other group to have them, all right! Is one group 100% bad and the other 100% good?
 

sag38

Active Member
It seems in this country that hate crimes are limited to prosecuting only with specific groups while other groups are seemingly exempt making one wonder as to the true reason behind the establishment of these so called hate crime laws.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
Of course, it's wrong for one group to have an apologist, yet perfectly OK for the other group to have them, all right! Is one group 100% bad and the other 100% good?

Nobody has said anything like this, furthermore, your adding words to the people you disagree with will keep racial problems alive.
 

Eric B

Active Member
Site Supporter
And likewise, Jackson and Sharpton never actually say "all your problems are white people's fault" either. I heard Jackson speak in 1980 and 1984, and he never said anything like that. I used to see Sharpton on the Morton Downey show (almost a semi regular) debating similar topics, and in whichever news stories he gets involved in, and he doesn't actually say that (and I'll be checking what he says on MSNBC, if I can catch the show).
Likewise, accusing this riot of being "Obama's World", as if he led it himself!

No, it's because you think their ideology insinuates such blame, that you make these claims. So my point is, it seems to be perfectly OK for you and others to do exactly what you accuse me, and them, of doing, and that raises the question of why.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
You are right. Sharpton only painted a teenager with excrement, and blamed HER problems on white provactuers. Jackson has said if a black man votes anything but democrat, he ain't truly black.

Give it a rest. Please.
 

Eric B

Active Member
Site Supporter
That's still not the same thing as "telling people all their lives that all their problems are 'whitey's' fault"; and I should point out, that that latter racial epithet has been coming from your side an awful lot). That's not "adding words" just like you criticized? (How then about people who say anyone who does vote Democrat is not a Christian? That would fit Dems being "100% bad").

So do you really believe that this riot is because of Tawana Brawley?
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
Now it's "my" side ?

You just LOVE to call people racists, and twist their words.

Good-bye, Eric.
 

Eric B

Active Member
Site Supporter
Isn't that exactly what you're doing? (Though simply mentioning "sides" is not necessarily about race. You're not the only one who uses that sarcastic "whitey" reference, so all "your side" means is those who agree with you, and have also used the term in the same context).

It's obvious that a lot of hyperbole gets used in these heated debates. Only my terms such as "100%" are clearly rhetorical statements, where you (and others) seem to be dead serious in these outlandish generalizations.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
It seems in this country that hate crimes are limited to prosecuting only with specific groups while other groups are seemingly exempt making one wonder as to the true reason behind the establishment of these so called hate crime laws.


This sums it all up, very nicely.
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
California: Always Ahead of the Curve?

Out in this area of California (Southern), it is more of the brown-on-black thing! In fact, there are a ton of black folk that thinks brown-skinned folks are causing the welfare and medical systems to fail.

I have talked with quite a few black friends and acquaintances, and they are adamant when it comes to illegal Mexicans. The same things the white-skinned folk blamed on the black skinned folk way back when, is now being blamed on the brown-skinned folk by the black skinned folk.

Who would have ever thought that blacks would be complaining about another race overwhelming and taking advantage of the medical and welfare systems?

When I was a teen (the late 60's), it was the white folk that blamed the overwhelming of welfare and medical programs on blacks.

I guess the pendulum has finally swung the other way!

We truly live in a very interesting world and society!

Pastor Paul :type:



NOTE to Magnetic Poles: This is not a racist comment. Merely, a sociological observation of how times change. So shake your skinny little stick man finger, in someone else direction. Or, better yet, point it at you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JPPT1974

Active Member
Site Supporter
Al Sharpton is way too extreme as will not watch that guy at MSNBC! Now joining people like O'Reiley and Imus!
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It seems in this country that hate crimes are limited to prosecuting only with specific groups while other groups are seemingly exempt making one wonder as to the true reason behind the establishment of these so called hate crime laws.

Same goes for civil rights violations.

Blacks can intimidate and threaten voters, particularly white voters, at a polling place without fear of prosecution.

At least, they can while Obama is president. Later administrations may actually enforce the laws of our country without regard to race. Just as it was before Obama was elected.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bob Alkire

New Member
Al Sharpton is way too extreme as will not watch that guy at MSNBC! Now joining people like O'Reiley and Imus!
I didn't know Don Imus was still around. He has been quite a mess at times. I know he use to have John Kerry on a lot, they seemed to be pals. Needless to say I didn't care for Kerry.
 
Top