The TU-ML do not correspond but they still preach together, The Doctrine of the Friendship would be a mixture of both sides not as Arminian as NNS, I have seen circular letters that were on Election and Predestination but they also have ministers that are more of the hybird mixture, this same mixture exists in almost all of the NS--Union correspondence and to some extent in the Indian Bottoms , Sardis had some Old Brothers that were highly esteemed that held to Free Grace ,New Salem and Union still do, they hang on for various reasons but we have made a way for them to come to the other side if they wish.I see no movement for reconciliation, of the Old Regular Factions .The heart of the matter is this our side believes in regeneration before conversion, faith and repentence .Thus a man repents because he has life they advocate that all men have faith (if that be true you would have a universal salvation doctrine ,which they deny) and they repent to obtain life, we are Primitive Baptist they are freewills with eternal security attached (not all ministers on that side believe in freewill, but they all fellowship it, and if they try to correct it, they are labeled an absoluter or hardshell) So there is no way they can walk together in unity, but I would ask for you to research and see which side is closer to the doctrine of the first Regular Baptist also if you have the History of Regular Baptist look at the Union Assn. Articles of Faith where did they come from and look at the Biblical References given, look at the Confession of Faith on Bro.Bobby Scotts web page on History to his credit he did not try to smooth it over or omit that confession. You will at once see who is preaching the original RB doctrine. Elder Slone:smilewinkgrin:
raying: