Opposing Science if it agrees with Christians

[Paul of Eugene]

Originally posted by BobRyan:
To the extent that Christians (and even Christian evolutionists like Behe) allow the anti-Christian bias to prevail unchallenged and still-disguised in America we will see Christian values continue to be removed from our nation.

There is no "benefit" for Christians to simply "sleep through" this one.

In Christ,

Bob

The unfortunate linkage by some between the evidence - denying anti evolution stand and christianity serves to give Christianity a bad reputation and places an additional man-made impediment between the inquiring mind and accepting Christ. The implacable enemy of our souls rejoices when he is able to confuse some to think they they must reject the one truth in order to accept the other truth.

God is able to graciously forgive that offense but that does not mean we can commit that offense without consequences.

 

[BobRyan]

If you read the quote from me that you provided in your post you will see that I included the need for both Christians and actual Christian evolutionists (like Behe) to be alert on this one.).

Your personnal preference and effort to recast Christian evolutionists like Behe as "anti-evolutionists" is noted.

But the point remains.

The fact that you appear to value "inquiring minds" is a hopefull indicator that you may yet come out in opposition to the draconian censorship policy that this thread is addressing.

In Christ,

Bob

 

[Paul of Eugene]

(sigh) Just talk about ID in social studies class, you'll get away with that very easily.

 

[BobRyan]

So your saying that the "thought police" wont think to go there to enforce "Censorship" as along as they don't view "Social studies" as a threat to the myths and pseudoscience of Atheist Darwiniian evolutionism?

Why not deal with the "Actual" problem?

Why not "admit" that NOTHING in our constitution says "only atheism is proper for all Americans!". Nothing in the constiution demands freedom FROM science facts that favor Bible Believing Christians!

NOTHING in our constitution demands the rank draconian censorship of science that atheist darwinian evolutionists "demand".

Or is that open minded option too much of a stretch for those blindly devoted to atheist darwinian evolution? (Or perhaps Darwinian evolution is too defensive, too weakened to tolerate open discussion of the data in science classes?)

I notice that you did not bother to show how "open minds" needed to press for rank draconinan censorship. Care to comment now on why you are pushing for censorship?

(While "of course" you fully believe that Intelligent Design is "clearly seen" and in fact "Self evident" in nature - "of course")

The point remains -- "still".

(I wonder how many more immaginative ways you will find to dodge it)

In Christ,

Bob