• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Ordinances only symbolic?

Michael Wrenn

New Member
Are the ordinances only symbolic, or, as Calvin believed, with the participation of the Holy Spirit, faith is nourished and strengthened by the ordinances? Of course if one holds to that, this would make them sacraments rather than ordinances, as this would affirm the spiritual presence of Jesus at the administration of them.

But isn't that closer to the truth, rather than the merely symbolic view? Isn't Jesus spiritually present in everything we do in His name? Of course that would make sacraments innumerable, as the Quakers believed, and make all of life sacramental.
 

saturneptune

New Member
Are the ordinances only symbolic, or, as Calvin believed, with the participation of the Holy Spirit, faith is nourished and strengthened by the ordinances? Of course if one holds to that, this would make them sacraments rather than ordinances, as this would affirm the spiritual presence of Jesus at the administration of them.

But isn't that closer to the truth, rather than the merely symbolic view? Isn't Jesus spiritually present in everything we do in His name? Of course that would make sacraments innumerable, as the Quakers believed, and make all of life sacramental.
Every Christian has the Holy Spirit living in him or her. Every aspect of life is a gift from the Lord. Christ is present in a spiritual manner with us everyday. The Lord's Supper is in remembence of Him, body and blood shed. Baptism is a public profession of faith in Jesus Christ. Of course Christ is with us during the ordinances and all of our life in a spiritual manner.

The ordinances/sacraments are not magic acts or a physical manifestation of our Savior. That is so much hocus pocus. It reminds me of Simon in Acts trying to buy the power of the Holy Spirit, or some of the Indiana Jones movies, attaching magical powers to relics of Christ. To attach the power of the Living God to some cheap man made belief is beyond excuse. To think what man has done to the Lord's church in a mere 2000 years. Some denominations are based on such nonsense.
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think that whenever we obey God, our faith is strengthened. It's not just through certain acts but ALL acts of obedience.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Are the ordinances only symbolic, or, as Calvin believed, with the participation of the Holy Spirit, faith is nourished and strengthened by the ordinances? Of course if one holds to that, this would make them sacraments rather than ordinances, as this would affirm the spiritual presence of Jesus at the administration of them.

But isn't that closer to the truth, rather than the merely symbolic view? Isn't Jesus spiritually present in everything we do in His name? Of course that would make sacraments innumerable, as the Quakers believed, and make all of life sacramental. (As the Roman Catholics believe)

Apples & oranges....take Baptism

http://www.vor.org/truth/1689/1689bc28.html

The second London Confession of 1689 underscored that "immersion", or dipping of the person in water, is necessary to the due {proper}administration of the ordinance. I view its level of importance by its salvic grace & if its not there then its a ritual. &, from my prospective anyway....it's not there.

Calvin on the other hand as noted by Presby or Reformed (Dutch), tried to reformulate it from RCC (baptismal rebirth) by concocting some grafting in nonsense & old covenant sign of circumcision making it a new covenant sign of baptism. Rrriiigggghhhhttttt!:laugh:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

billwald

New Member
In several heathen countries it is Christian baptism which alienates the person from the local population. In other words, the heathen understand the Christian sacraments better than Baptists do.
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In several heathen countries it is Christian baptism which alienates the person from the local population. In other words, the heathen understand the Christian sacraments better than Baptists do.

Since baptism shows clearly where one stands even if you don't speak a word, and all Baptists I know understand this well, I don't believe your conclusion is true.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apples & oranges....take Baptism

http://www.vor.org/truth/1689/1689bc28.html

The second London Confession of 1689 underscored that "immersion", or dipping of the person in water, is necessary to the due {proper}administration of the ordinance. I view its level of importance by its salvic grace & if its not there then its a ritual. &, from my prospective anyway....it's not there.

Calvin on the other hand as noted by Presby or Reformed (Dutch), tried to reformulate it from RCC (baptismal rebirth) by concocting some grafting in nonsense & old covenant sign of circumcision making it a new covenant sign of baptism. Rrriiigggghhhhttttt!:laugh:

BIG difference between seeing that the Lord, by the presense of the Spirit, is there with you at taking of the ordiances than saying that they in and by themelves convey additional garce, supplying what was not there beforehand!
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
In several heathen countries it is Christian baptism which alienates the person from the local population. In other words, the heathen understand the Christian sacraments better than Baptists do.

Since baptism shows clearly where one stands even if you don't speak a word, and all Baptists I know understand this well, I don't believe your conclusion is true.

Actually, I agree with Bill on this one.
We do not see the full significance of baptism
 
Top