Jarthur001 said:
Its called a double entendre and means both natures.
I know this and was having a little fun with you - I know you do not believe in universalism :thumbs:
Indeed it does. God lights all men. But life must be in the man before he can see the light. What light does a dead man see?
What?!

God lights all men - Statement of God illumating the minds of all mankind
BUT life must be in man before he can see - Statement of 2 possibilities
....1. Man is physically alive and therefore God will illumitate his (and all mankinds) understanding about God in accordance with vs 9 (lighting every man)
OR
....2. Man must be spiritually alive in order for God to be able to illuminate his understanding but not to all men - thus disputing vs 9 (lighting every man).
A spiritually dead man can see what God makes him able to see James. That is both the power and perogitive of God.
If they are born of God....they then believe...for they have light.
No, born is not something prior to salvation but is the act of salvation. That is why the topic we are discussing in this post is really a philosophical argument based upon a false premise of what you understand dead to be (IMO). That is why I want to talk about what regeneration entails and how those aspects transpirie prior to faith when scripture specifically refutes this out-right by stating they are imparted 'by faith'.
Maybe you need to re-visit the passage.
Your right, I needed to clarify.
Christ lighting of the world refers only to all the unregenerate lost people on the planet. Not once, ever in the the entirety of scripture is the word 'world' used to descibe God's people or the elect. So you are correct in that I needed to clarify that statement since it did not mean ALL of mankind.
As to Romans 1....
Please read the text again and tell me if this is not knowing the facts about God.
No, this is knowing AND understanding all that God has revealed about Himself to them. They learned nothing about these things of or by themselves but the passage expressly states that God revealed these things to them - for the purpose of them believing. We know this because they chose not to and it was at that point that God gave them over to their choice AFTER He revealed Himself, Sin, and the Judgment to come. Is that not the work of the Holy Spirit in the world and that same work that He does upon the Elect or believers. Yep, I thought so to.
People can believe there is a God and never see a need for them to follow Him. They can even believe Christ died or a cross and was raised on the 3rd day. Believing this happened is not salvation. Man can understand all the facts about God and reject God.
Very true but no man on earth will ever (not ever) come to know any of this in a fashion were-by it is a truth to be denied except that God reveal it to them. Scripture states God is the one who reveals to man - there IS a God, that Christ died AND 'rose again' (something only the Holy Spirit can bring someone to understand) the 3rd day. These are not 'just' facts but facts that ONLY God reveals to man. God illuminates the truth to the unregnerate that they might KNOW the truth. This knowing always entails understanding James.
Understanding....is seeing your need to be saved from your sin. Back to John 1...verse 13 it says...Believe on his name. This name that verse 13 is talking about is not Jesus. There were tons on men called Jesus. It means Christ. When you believe Jesus was the Christ you mean you take him in all three OT offices. Prophet, Priest and King.
Understanding means then this...
As Prophet..believe he is the the way and the truth.
As Priest...I believe his blood took my sins.
As King...I live to follow and serve Him.
Understanding is seeing but understanding is not the same as believing and you are confusing the two.
One can understand all the God reveals about Himself, sin, and the Judgment to come (and they will understand since God hasn't failed in teaching yet) but that does not necessitate they will believe. Rom 1, Prov 1, 2 Thes 2, Ezk 33 all illistrate this point. God brings forth light to those IN Darkness that they might have life, not vise-versa brother.
"
Mat 4:16 The people which sat in darkness saw great light; and to them which sat in the region and shadow of death light is sprung up."
"
Luk 1:79 To give light to them that sit in darkness and [in] the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the way of peace. "
"
Jhn 12:46 I am come a light into the world, that
whosoever believeth on me should not abide in darkness. "
"
Act 26:18 To open their eyes, [and] to turn [them] from darkness to light, and [from] the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me."
"
Rom 2:19 And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, "
"
1Pe 2:9 But ye [are] a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:"
Notice here that God Called them out of darkness - the call is the gospel call and they were still in darkness when He called them out.
This is salvation and not what you see in Romans 1 where the people know about God...or could have known about God, but not have him as King they turned from him and rejected him for they did not understand their need.
Brother you are adding so much to the passage that is not even remotely there. You are dividing the meaning of understanding to be two distinctly different things then they are in fact one and the same. They KNEW - the only distinction is not understanding but whether or not they 'by faith' receiced that knowledge as truth.
Thus your premise of life before understanding is (as I see it biblically) a faulty one, if not a false one.