• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Original Sin and Romans 5

The Biblicist

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Ps 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

Obviously these wicked people are the non-elect babies that God is going to send to Hell for his glory. Eventually they would grow up to be wicked people. Nothing in this verse about elect babies.

You can't possibly be serious? David claims that he too was born in sin and he was not blaming his mother for any type of fornication, but taking responsibility for his own sin - Psa. 51.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Ps 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

Obviously these wicked people are the non-elect babies that God is going to send to Hell for his glory. Eventually they would grow up to be wicked people. Nothing in this verse about elect babies.
That indeed is so obvious that all Calvinists with the very omniscience of God can clearly declare that 100% of all non-elect infants will go to Hell. And just like God, they can tell which ones are elect and which ones are not, as demonstrated in the above post.

The truth is: Every person is born "wicked." Thus the necessity of the "new birth."
 

Don

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
My apologies; I read this line from one of your posts on page 1:
Ephesians 2:1 deals with those capable of what describes their past in verse 2-3 and that is impossible for infants.
and took it to mean that you didn't believe babies will go to hell.

I am not quite sure what your point may be. Yes infants have a sin nature and any parent can attest to that even though the infants do not recognize how they behave is the essence of sin - self-centeredness. Yes, they are not capable of discerning truth from error and so cannot make a responsible choice and if they die in that state they have no sins plural to be judged, and all who go to hell are judged "according to THEIR works" instead of Adam's.

Ps 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

1. There are not two classification of infants, the wicked versus the righteous, as all are equally born with a sinful nature and that sinful nature is manifest "as soon as they be born".

2. You don't have to speak English or any language to lie. You can lie by your actions and tone of voice. Babies are quick to figure out that crying gets attention even when they are not hurting or hungry. Before they can speak they manifest selfish, angry, deceptivness and every parent who does not live in la la land knows that by experience.

Apparently, from this post, you do believe that babies can go to hell.
 

The Biblicist

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
My apologies; I read this line from one of your posts on page 1: and took it to mean that you didn't believe babies will go to hell.



Apparently, from this post, you do believe that babies can go to hell.

I most certainly do not believe infants go to hell. So you understood me correctly the first time. All who go to hell are those who are judged "according to their works" and dying infants have no works as they have no ability to personal choose good or evil just as God told Jonah.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You can't possibly be serious? David claims that he too was born in sin and he was not blaming his mother for any type of fornication, but taking responsibility for his own sin - Psa. 51.

Yes, I was speaking a bit with tongue in cheek. But remember in the Psalms David frequently classifies people as wicked or righteous. Obviously in this verse,

Ps 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

he is speaking about wicked adults that have been wicked all their lives. It's not to be taken literally that they speak lies as newborns. It's a bit of hyperbole.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The truth is: Every person is born "wicked." Thus the necessity of the "new birth."

I would say born with a wicked nature, or a bent to do wickedness. But newborns don't "speak lies" as soon as they are born. That was figurative language and hyperbole by David in that verse to emphasize the utter wickedness of some people.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

The Biblicist

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes, I was speaking a bit with tongue in cheek. But remember in the Psalms David frequently classifies people as wicked or righteous. Obviously in this verse,

Ps 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

he is speaking about wicked adults that have been wicked all their lives. It's not to be taken literally that they speak lies as newborns. It's a bit of hyperbole.

So you just ignore "as soon as they be born" but retranslate it "as soon as they be adults"????? Why not just write your own bible?
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
So you just ignore "as soon as they be born" but retranslate it "as soon as they be adults"????? Why not just write your own bible?

You completely contradict yourself.

"I most certainly do not believe infants go to hell. So you understood me correctly the first time. All who go to hell are those who are judged "according to their works" and dying infants have no works as they have no ability to personal choose good or evil just as God told Jonah."

Are they wicked from conception or not? If they are, they are guilty and can only be saved by grace through faith, not judged on their works. That's a false salvation.

Adults = saved by grace through faith
Infants = saved by works

:confused:
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So you just ignore "as soon as they be born" but retranslate it "as soon as they be adults"????? Why not just write your own bible?

I would caution anyone to take Psalms literally or build doctrine on it. David is basically saying, "these people are so wicked they've been liars since they were born". He's not saying that newborns are all liars. Sheesh.
 

The Biblicist

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You completely contradict yourself.

"I most certainly do not believe infants go to hell. So you understood me correctly the first time. All who go to hell are those who are judged "according to their works" and dying infants have no works as they have no ability to personal choose good or evil just as God told Jonah."

Are they wicked from conception or not? If they are, they are guilty and can only be saved by grace through faith, not judged on their works. That's a false salvation.

Adults = saved by grace through faith
Infants = saved by works

:confused:

You forget, that I also believe that it is God that worketh in us both TO WILL and therefore it is not inconsistent to believe that death is appointed by God and this is an act of mercy by God who works in the infant also to "WILL" repentance and faith in the gospel. Remember, the infant John the Baptists leaped "for joy" when HE HEARD the glad tidings of the Messianic birth, WHILE STILL IN THE WOMB, so don't tell me that God cannot make the dying infant understand the gospel. Remember, God himself preached the gospel unto Abraham, so don't tell me that God can't do the same for dying infants. So absolutely no inconsistency at all - period, nada, zilch!
 

The Biblicist

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I would caution anyone to take Psalms literally or build doctrine on it. David is basically saying, "these people are so wicked they've been liars since they were born". He's not saying that newborns are all liars. Sheesh.

I would caution you not to despise a Prophet. If you remember David is a prophet of God and what He wrote was inspired scripture:

Acts 2:29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. 30 Therefore being a prophet,

You explain how David could even make that comment without either lying or by prophetic insight?
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I would caution you not to despise a Prophet.

I'm not despising him at all.

You explain how David could even make that comment without either lying or by prophetic insight?

Lighten up. It's a matter of interpretation. David is simply saying these people were so wicked it's as if they've been lying since they were born. It's a bit of hyperbole. Unless you literally believe God gave an infant the ability to speak, and to speak lies. Is that it?
 

The Biblicist

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It's a bit of hyperbole.

No the only hyperbole is your attempt to provide a serious interpretation. This is not David's first statement on this subject. He says the same thing about his own birth (Psa. 51:5). He is not the only prophet who confirms this.


Apparently, you did not thoroughly read my post on that verse. You don't have to speak Hebrew (or English) to lie. Dumb (inability to speak) people can lie. There are a multitude of ways a person can lie. They can lie by the tone of voice, they can lie by their actions. Apparently, you have had no children or been around children as infants. Most infants cannot speak a language until they are about 2 years old. Any parent can tell you they can lie long before they can speak intelligably. I have had five children and I know exactly what David is saying about the fallen nature of infants manifested almost literally as soon as they are born, and saying about himself, as no one needs to teach children to be selfish, self-centered, cruel and lie - they can do it NATURALLY all by themselve, that is a UNIVERSAL truth that David is simply expressing. If you don''t live in la la land you know this to be true.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No the only hyperbole is your attempt to provide a serious interpretation. This is not David's first statement on this subject. He says the same thing about his own birth (Psa. 51:5). He is not the only prophet who confirms this.


Apparently, you did not thoroughly read my post on that verse. You don't have to speak Hebrew (or English) to lie. Dumb (inability to speak) people can lie. There are a multitude of ways a person can lie. They can lie by the tone of voice, they can lie by their actions. Apparently, you have had no children or been around children as infants. Most infants cannot speak a language until they are about 2 years old. Any parent can tell you they can lie long before they can speak intelligably. I have had five children and I know exactly what David is saying about the fallen nature of infants manifested almost literally as soon as they are born, and saying about himself, as no one needs to teach children to be selfish, self-centered, cruel and lie - they can do it NATURALLY all by themselve, that is a UNIVERSAL truth that David is simply expressing. If you don''t live in la la land you know this to be true.

You are hilarious. I have two teenagers. I know that children can lie. I also know that infants can't lie.

I think you need to read the rest of Psalm 58 and notice all the similes David uses. For example if the wicked literally speak lies as babies from birth, do they also:

have poison like serpents, are deaf like cobras that can't be charmed (verse 4,5)
have fangs of young lions (verse 6)
are snails that melt (verse 8)

??
 

The Biblicist

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I also know that infants can't lie.

So, according to you "dumb" persons can't lie either simply because they cannot vocalize? Is that right? Your interpretation of "thou shalt not lie" is phariseeical as they too interpreted the commandments precisely in keeping with how you do.

If you had two teenagers were you simply an absent father between their birth and the time they could vocalize? Have you ever had an infant scream as though they were hurt or hungry or the diapers were wet or sullied, when in fact they simply had leaned very quickly that screaming gets your attention or they are simply angry and thowing a fit because they didn't get their way, or what they want? An infant looks so innocent and sweet, but have you ever experienced just plain meanness by an infant in anger? That is lying.

The only reason you don't see much at birth is because they are physically limited to express themselves, but as soon as they are able to use more physical expression it comes out raw. Do you live in la la land? You must! THE NEXT THING YOU ARE GOING TO TELL US IS THAT YOU TAUGHT THEM HOW TO LIE, BE SELFISH, SELF-CENTERED, ENVY, ETC. Did you? Was it simply there environmant or your example that taught them? Surely you are not that simplistic to believe that are you?

I think you need to read the rest of Psalm 58 and notice all the similes David uses. For example if the wicked literally speak lies as babies from birth, do they also:

have poison like serpents, are deaf like cobras that can't be charmed (verse 4,5)
have fangs of young lions (verse 6)
are snails that melt (verse 8)

??

You need to learn proper hermeneutics! Do you notice the word "like" in those descriptions? That is called a "simile"! Do you know what a simile is? It is a comparison of one thing to another thing. HOWEVER, HE DOES NOT USE A SIMILE IN VERSE 5 IN HIS DESCRIPTION OF LYING OR OF BIRTH!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So, according to you "dumb" persons can't lie either simply because they cannot vocalize? Is that right? Your interpretation of "thou shalt not lie" is phariseeical as they too interpreted the commandments precisely in keeping with how you do.

If you had two teenagers were you simply an absent father between their birth and the time they could vocalize? Have you ever had an infant scream as though they were hurt or hungry or the diapers were wet or sullied, when in fact they simply had leaned very quickly that screaming gets your attention?

You are attributing motivations to the infant that you cannot possibly know. Maybe the child is crying for attention, plain and simple, and not deviously thinking to himself, "I'm going to cry as if my diaper was wet, so I can get attention." Maybe the kid realizes if he cries he gets attention and it's that simple. No lying involved.


An infant looks so innocent and sweet, but have you ever experienced just plain meanness by an infant in anger? That is lying.

Anger = Lying. Okie-Dokie. So now you are saying God is a liar, because God gets angry.

Behold, the name of the Lord comes from afar,
Burning with His anger,
And His burden is heavy;
His lips are full of indignation,
And His tongue like a devouring fire. Isaiah 30:27

The only reason you don't see much at birth is because they are physically limited to express themselves, but as soon as they are able to use more physical expression it comes out raw. Do you live in la la land? You must!

No, I don't live in la-la land. However, you are now living in my Killfile Land. Good bye.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

The Biblicist

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You are attributing motivations to the infant that you cannot possibly know. Maybe the child is crying for attention, plain and simple, and not deviously thinking to himself, "I'm going to cry as if my diaper was wet, so I can get attention." Maybe the kid realizes if he cries he gets attention and it's that simple. No lying involved.

You are denying the insight of a prophet that you cannot possibly be qualified to deny! Moreover, I did not say EVERY time a child cries he is lying, but you are claiming it is impossible for them to lie at all, and any parent with common sense knows thats a complete la la land imagination at work.
 

The Biblicist

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Anger = Lying. Okie-Dokie. So now you are saying God is a liar, because God gets angry.

You need to read more carefully as I said no such thing. I simply used the example of anger or simply wanting attention as causes for crying instead of any pain, or hunger or discomfort as a normal cause for crying. The child has learned that if he throws a fit, you come running, when he is not hurt, hungry or in any physical discomfort. If you have experienced terrible two's and three's you know how obvious the fallen nature can be manifested in a child, unless you do live in la la land?
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How can anyone miss the teaching of original sin??? Critics have you read Romans 5? Those that reject original sin believe man is born neutral but still in need of a savior since he will sin. A definite flawed view of the Bible. Anyone on this board deny original sin?

Those who do that are basically gutting the Pauline teaching of the Gospel and the Cross...
 
Top